Alternatives to Statamic logo

Alternatives to Statamic

WordPress, Craft, Grav, Craft CMS, and Drupal are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Statamic.
61
114
+ 1
28

What is Statamic and what are its top alternatives?

Statamic is a flat-file CMS that offers a user-friendly control panel, flexible content modeling, and powerful templating capabilities. Users can create and manage content easily without the need for a database. However, Statamic might not be suitable for more complex websites or projects that require extensive customization options.

  1. WordPress: WordPress is a popular open-source CMS that offers a wide range of plugins and themes for customization. It has a large community and extensive documentation. However, it can be resource-intensive and may require regular updates.
  2. Craft CMS: Craft CMS is a flexible and user-friendly CMS that allows for custom content modeling and templating. It offers a solid user interface and scalability options. However, it may require more technical expertise compared to Statamic.
  3. Grav: Grav is a modern flat-file CMS that focuses on speed and simplicity. It has a flexible architecture and a wide range of plugins for extended functionality. However, it may not be as robust as Statamic for larger projects.
  4. Kirby: Kirby is a file-based CMS that is easy to set up and use. It offers fine-grained control over content structure and layout. However, it may lack some of the advanced features found in Statamic.
  5. Hugo: Hugo is a static site generator that is known for its speed and simplicity. It is highly customizable and has a large ecosystem of themes and templates. However, it may not provide the same level of content editing capabilities as Statamic.
  6. Jekyll: Jekyll is another static site generator that is popular for its simplicity and ease of use. It has a strong community and a wide range of plugins for extended functionality. However, it may not offer the same level of flexibility as Statamic for content modeling.
  7. Ghost: Ghost is a modern CMS focused on creating content for the web. It offers a clean and minimalist interface for writing and publishing. However, it may not have the same level of flexibility in terms of content modeling as Statamic.
  8. October CMS: October CMS is a self-hosted CMS platform that is built on the Laravel PHP framework. It offers a user-friendly interface and extensible architecture. However, it may require more technical expertise compared to Statamic.
  9. Bolt: Bolt is a lightweight and fast CMS that is built on the Symfony PHP framework. It offers a simple and intuitive interface for content management. However, it may not have the same level of customization options as Statamic.
  10. Pico: Pico is a simple flat-file CMS that is lightweight and easy to set up. It offers a basic set of features for creating and managing content. However, it may lack some of the more advanced capabilities of Statamic.

Top Alternatives to Statamic

  • WordPress
    WordPress

    The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family. ...

  • Craft
    Craft

    Craft is a content management system (CMS) that’s laser-focused on doing one thing really, really well: managing content. ...

  • Grav
    Grav

    It is a free, open-source and self-hosted content management system (CMS) based on the PHP programming language and Symfony web application framework. It uses a flat file database for both backend and frontend. It is more widely used, and growing at a faster rate, than other leading flat-file CMS competitors. ...

  • Craft CMS
    Craft CMS

    It is a flexible, user-friendly CMS for creating custom digital experiences on the web and beyond. It is a WordPress alternative for development-oriented publishers who want deeper control and more powerful performance from their content management tools. It is built to be exceptionably scalable, and offers native features for complex content management relationships. ...

  • Drupal
    Drupal

    Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world. ...

  • Ghost
    Ghost

    Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do. ...

  • OctoberCMS
    OctoberCMS

    It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits. ...

  • Jekyll
    Jekyll

    Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories. ...

Statamic alternatives & related posts

WordPress logo

WordPress

98.3K
2.1K
A semantic personal publishing platform with a focus on aesthetics, web standards, and usability.
98.3K
2.1K
PROS OF WORDPRESS
  • 416
    Customizable
  • 367
    Easy to manage
  • 354
    Plugins & themes
  • 259
    Non-tech colleagues can update website content
  • 247
    Really powerful
  • 145
    Rapid website development
  • 78
    Best documentation
  • 51
    Codex
  • 44
    Product feature set
  • 35
    Custom/internal social network
  • 18
    Open source
  • 8
    Great for all types of websites
  • 7
    Huge install and user base
  • 5
    I like it like I like a kick in the groin
  • 5
    It's simple and easy to use by any novice
  • 5
    Perfect example of user collaboration
  • 5
    Open Source Community
  • 5
    Most websites make use of it
  • 5
    Best
  • 4
    API-based CMS
  • 4
    Community
  • 3
    Easy To use
  • 2
    <a href="https://secure.wphackedhel">Easy Beginner</a>
CONS OF WORDPRESS
  • 13
    Hard to keep up-to-date if you customize things
  • 13
    Plugins are of mixed quality
  • 10
    Not best backend UI
  • 2
    Complex Organization
  • 1
    Do not cover all the basics in the core
  • 1
    Great Security

related WordPress posts

Shared insights
on
ElementorElementorWordPressWordPress

hello guys, I need your help. I created a website, I've been using Elementor forever, but yesterday I bought a template after I made the purchase I knew I made a mistake, cause the template was in HTML, can anyone please show me how to put this HTML template in my WordPress so it will be the face of my website, thank you in advance.

See more
Dale Ross
Independent Contractor at Self Employed · | 22 upvotes · 1.7M views

I've heard that I have the ability to write well, at times. When it flows, it flows. I decided to start blogging in 2013 on Blogger. I started a company and joined BizPark with the Microsoft Azure allotment. I created a WordPress blog and did a migration at some point. A lot happened in the time after that migration but I stopped coding and changed cities during tumultuous times that taught me many lessons concerning mental health and productivity. I eventually graduated from BizSpark and outgrew the credit allotment. That killed the WordPress blog.

I blogged about writing again on the existing Blogger blog but it didn't feel right. I looked at a few options where I wouldn't have to worry about hosting cost indefinitely and Jekyll stood out with GitHub Pages. The Importer was fairly straightforward for the existing blog posts.

Todo * Set up redirects for all posts on blogger. The URI format is different so a complete redirect wouldn't work. Although, there may be something in Jekyll that could manage the redirects. I did notice the old URLs were stored in the front matter. I'm working on a command-line Ruby gem for the current plan. * I did find some of the lost WordPress posts on archive.org that I downloaded with the waybackmachinedownloader. I think I might write an importer for that. * I still have a few Disqus comment threads to map

See more
Craft logo

Craft

138
29
A CMS built to do one thing and do it well: manage content
138
29
PROS OF CRAFT
  • 8
    Quick bespoke CMS
  • 7
    Easy to use CMS
  • 6
    Clean slate approach to templating
  • 2
    Has it's own StackExcange
  • 2
    Clean templating markup (twig)
  • 2
    Great support
  • 2
    Free licence available for single user account version
CONS OF CRAFT
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Craft posts

    Grav logo

    Grav

    114
    16
    A modern open source flat-file CMS
    114
    16
    PROS OF GRAV
    • 4
      Easy to Update
    • 3
      No Databases
    • 2
      Fast Performance
    • 2
      Extensive Plugins
    • 2
      Strong Security
    • 2
      Full Control over customisation + functionality
    • 1
      Ligth storage use
    CONS OF GRAV
    • 2
      Not easily to intergrate as an eCommerce (yet)

    related Grav posts

    Craft CMS logo

    Craft CMS

    104
    5
    A flexible, user-friendly Content Management System (CMS)
    104
    5
    PROS OF CRAFT CMS
    • 1
      Headless
    • 1
      Graphql
    • 1
      Secure
    • 1
      Extensible
    • 1
      Easy to use
    CONS OF CRAFT CMS
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Craft CMS posts

      Drupal logo

      Drupal

      11.1K
      360
      Free, Open, Modular CMS written in PHP
      11.1K
      360
      PROS OF DRUPAL
      • 75
        Stable, highly functional cms
      • 60
        Great community
      • 44
        Easy cms to make websites
      • 43
        Highly customizable
      • 22
        Digital customer experience delivery platform
      • 17
        Really powerful
      • 16
        Customizable
      • 11
        Flexible
      • 10
        Good tool for prototyping
      • 9
        Enterprise proven over many years when others failed
      • 8
        Headless adds even more power/flexibility
      • 8
        Open source
      • 7
        Each version becomes more intuitive for clients to use
      • 7
        Well documented
      • 6
        Lego blocks methodology
      • 4
        Caching and performance
      • 3
        Built on Symfony
      • 3
        Powerful
      • 3
        Can build anything
      • 2
        Views
      • 2
        API-based CMS
      CONS OF DRUPAL
      • 1
        DJango
      • 1
        Steep learning curve

      related Drupal posts

      Hi, I am working as a web developer (PHP, Laravel, AngularJS, and MySQL) with more than 8 years of experience and looking for a tech stack that pays better. I have a little bit of knowledge of Core Java. For better opportunities, Should I learn Java, Spring Boot or Python. Or should I learn Drupal, WordPress or Magento? Any guidance would be really appreciated! Thanks.

      See more
      Jan Vlnas
      Senior Software Engineer at Mews · | 6 upvotes · 68.4K views

      Depends on what options and technologies you have available, and how do you deploy your website.

      There are CMSs which update existing static pages through FTP: You provide access credentials, mark editable parts of your HTML in a markup, and then edit the content through the hosted CMS. I know two systems which work like that: Cushy CMS and Surreal CMS.

      If the source of your site is versioned through Git (and hosted on GitHub), you have other options, like Netlify CMS, Spinal CMS, Siteleaf, Forestry, or CloudCannon. Some of these also need you to use static site generator (like 11ty, Jekyll, or Hugo).

      If you have some server-side scripting support available (typically PHP) you can also consider some flat-file based, server-side systems, like Kirby CMS or Lektor, which are usually simpler to retrofit into an existing template than “traditional” CMSs (WordPress, Drupal).

      Finally, you could also use a desktop-based static site generator which provides a user-friendly GUI, and then locally generates and uploads the website. For example Publii, YouDoCMS, Agit CMS.

      See more
      Ghost logo

      Ghost

      510
      219
      Just a blogging platform
      510
      219
      PROS OF GHOST
      • 45
        Beautiful
      • 35
        Fast
      • 29
        Quick/simple post styling
      • 20
        Live Post Preview
      • 20
        Open source
      • 19
        Non-profit
      • 16
        Seamless writing
      • 6
        Node.js
      • 5
        Fast and Performatic
      • 5
        Javascript
      • 4
        Simplest
      • 3
        Wonderful UI
      • 3
        Handlebars
      • 3
        Full Control
      • 2
        Magic
      • 2
        Clean
      • 1
        Headless CMS
      • 1
        Self-hostable
      CONS OF GHOST
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Ghost posts

        OctoberCMS logo

        OctoberCMS

        147
        109
        The Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity
        147
        109
        PROS OF OCTOBERCMS
        • 21
          Get back to basics
        • 17
          Highly customizable
        • 15
          Open-source, decent documentation
        • 12
          Laravel based
        • 12
          Easy to use
        • 11
          Production ready high speed backend development
        • 9
          Perfect frontend developer tool
        • 5
          Configurable backend
        • 5
          Perfect backend UI
        • 2
          Great community
        CONS OF OCTOBERCMS
        • 2
          Expensive recurring licence cost
        • 2
          Closed source

        related OctoberCMS posts

        Jekyll logo

        Jekyll

        1.9K
        230
        Blog-aware, static site generator in Ruby
        1.9K
        230
        PROS OF JEKYLL
        • 74
          Github pages integration
        • 54
          Open source
        • 37
          It's slick, customisable and hackerish
        • 24
          Easy to deploy
        • 23
          Straightforward cms for the hacker mindset
        • 7
          Gitlab pages integration
        • 5
          Best for blogging
        • 2
          Low maintenance
        • 2
          Easy to integrate localization
        • 1
          Huge plugins ecosystem
        • 1
          Authoring freedom and simplicity
        CONS OF JEKYLL
        • 4
          Build time increases exponentially as site grows
        • 2
          Lack of developments lately
        • 1
          Og doesn't work with postings dynamically

        related Jekyll posts

        Dale Ross
        Independent Contractor at Self Employed · | 22 upvotes · 1.7M views

        I've heard that I have the ability to write well, at times. When it flows, it flows. I decided to start blogging in 2013 on Blogger. I started a company and joined BizPark with the Microsoft Azure allotment. I created a WordPress blog and did a migration at some point. A lot happened in the time after that migration but I stopped coding and changed cities during tumultuous times that taught me many lessons concerning mental health and productivity. I eventually graduated from BizSpark and outgrew the credit allotment. That killed the WordPress blog.

        I blogged about writing again on the existing Blogger blog but it didn't feel right. I looked at a few options where I wouldn't have to worry about hosting cost indefinitely and Jekyll stood out with GitHub Pages. The Importer was fairly straightforward for the existing blog posts.

        Todo * Set up redirects for all posts on blogger. The URI format is different so a complete redirect wouldn't work. Although, there may be something in Jekyll that could manage the redirects. I did notice the old URLs were stored in the front matter. I'm working on a command-line Ruby gem for the current plan. * I did find some of the lost WordPress posts on archive.org that I downloaded with the waybackmachinedownloader. I think I might write an importer for that. * I still have a few Disqus comment threads to map

        See more
        Jan Vlnas
        Senior Software Engineer at Mews · | 6 upvotes · 68.4K views

        Depends on what options and technologies you have available, and how do you deploy your website.

        There are CMSs which update existing static pages through FTP: You provide access credentials, mark editable parts of your HTML in a markup, and then edit the content through the hosted CMS. I know two systems which work like that: Cushy CMS and Surreal CMS.

        If the source of your site is versioned through Git (and hosted on GitHub), you have other options, like Netlify CMS, Spinal CMS, Siteleaf, Forestry, or CloudCannon. Some of these also need you to use static site generator (like 11ty, Jekyll, or Hugo).

        If you have some server-side scripting support available (typically PHP) you can also consider some flat-file based, server-side systems, like Kirby CMS or Lektor, which are usually simpler to retrofit into an existing template than “traditional” CMSs (WordPress, Drupal).

        Finally, you could also use a desktop-based static site generator which provides a user-friendly GUI, and then locally generates and uploads the website. For example Publii, YouDoCMS, Agit CMS.

        See more