Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Ghost vs Statamic: What are the differences?
Introduction
In the world of content management systems, two popular options are Ghost and Statamic. While both are designed to help users manage and create content for their websites, they have key differences that set them apart.
Cost: Ghost is a paid platform that offers different pricing tiers based on the user's needs, ranging from personal blogs to business websites. In contrast, Statamic uses a one-time payment model, allowing users to purchase the software once and use it indefinitely without any ongoing subscription fees.
Technology Stack: Ghost is built on Node.js, which makes it fast and efficient for handling large volumes of content. On the other hand, Statamic is based on PHP and Laravel, offering a familiar environment for users who are comfortable with these technologies.
Flexibility and Customization: Statamic provides a more flexible and customizable experience for users, allowing them to create tailored solutions for their specific needs. Ghost, while user-friendly, may be more restrictive in terms of customization options due to its focus on simplicity and ease of use.
Content Structure: Ghost follows a more traditional content structure with posts, tags, and authors, making it ideal for blogs and news websites. In contrast, Statamic uses a file-based system that allows for more granular control over content, making it suitable for complex website structures like e-commerce sites.
Community and Support: Ghost has a larger community of users and developers, providing a wealth of resources and plugins to enhance the platform. Statamic, while having a smaller community, offers dedicated support and regular updates to ensure users have a smooth experience with the software.
Summary
In summary, Ghost and Statamic differ in terms of cost, technology stack, flexibility, content structure, and community support, catering to users with distinct needs and preferences in content management systems.
So many choices for CMSs these days. So then what do you choose if speed, security and customization are key? Headless for one. Consuming your own APIs for content is absolute key. It makes designing pages in the front-end a breeze. Leaving Ghost and Cockpit. If I then looked at the footprint and impact on server load, Cockpit definitely wins that battle.
Pros of Ghost
- Beautiful45
- Fast35
- Quick/simple post styling29
- Live Post Preview20
- Open source20
- Non-profit19
- Seamless writing16
- Node.js6
- Fast and Performatic5
- Javascript5
- Simplest4
- Wonderful UI3
- Handlebars3
- Full Control3
- Magic2
- Clean2
- Headless CMS1
- Self-hostable1
Pros of Statamic
- No database6
- Version control your content6
- Surprising flexibility4
- It is based on Laravel4
- Easy templating3
- Great documentation2
- Too expensive for personal blog2
- Self hosting1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Ghost
Cons of Statamic
- Not user friendly2