StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Symfony vs Vapor

Symfony vs Vapor

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Symfony
Symfony
Stacks8.5K
Followers6.2K
Votes1.1K
GitHub Stars30.7K
Forks9.7K
Vapor
Vapor
Stacks117
Followers217
Votes65

Symfony vs Vapor: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Symfony and Vapor.

  1. Deployment Process: With Symfony, the deployment process involves setting up and configuring servers, managing infrastructure, and ensuring scalability. On the other hand, Vapor is a serverless deployment platform that abstracts away the infrastructure management, allowing developers to focus solely on building their application. It handles all aspects of deployment, including scaling, load balancing, and server management.

  2. Cost: Symfony can be deployed on traditional hosting platforms, which often require payment for server resources and infrastructure management. Vapor, on the other hand, is a pay-as-you-go service with pricing based on usage, ensuring that developers only pay for the resources they actually consume. This makes Vapor a cost-effective option for smaller projects or projects with variable traffic patterns.

  3. Scalability: Symfony requires manual scaling to handle increasing traffic or load. This involves provisioning additional servers, load balancers, and configuring them to work together. Vapor, as a serverless platform, automatically scales the application based on demand. It handles the scaling process seamlessly, allowing the application to scale up or down without any manual intervention, providing a highly scalable environment.

  4. Maintenance: Symfony requires the developer to handle tasks such as server updates, security patches, and infrastructure maintenance. Vapor, being a serverless platform, takes care of all maintenance tasks. It ensures that the infrastructure is updated, secure, and patched, allowing developers to focus on the application logic rather than routine maintenance.

  5. Configuration: Symfony requires manual setup and configuration of servers, databases, and other infrastructure components. Vapor simplifies the configuration process by providing a user-friendly interface where developers can set up databases, queues, caches, and other services with just a few clicks. This reduces the time and effort involved in configuring the infrastructure.

  6. Auto-scaling: Symfony does not have built-in auto-scaling capabilities and requires manual scaling to handle sudden spikes in traffic. Vapor, as a serverless platform, automatically scales the application based on demand. It ensures that the application has enough resources to handle increased traffic without any manual intervention, providing seamless auto-scaling.

In summary, Symfony requires manual server management, deployment configuration, and scaling, while Vapor provides a serverless environment with automated scaling, simplified configuration, and reduced maintenance, making it a cost-effective and efficient option for deploying Symfony applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Symfony, Vapor

Fabian
Fabian

May 5, 2020

Needs adviceonGraphQLGraphQLC++C++SymfonySymfony

I'm about to begin working on an API, for which I plan to add GraphQL connectivity for processing data. The data processed will mainly be audio files being downloaded/uploaded with some user messaging & authentication.

I don't mind the difficulty in any service since I've used C++ (for data structures & algorithms at least) and would also say I am patient and can learn fairly quickly. My main concerns would be their performance, libraries/community, and job marketability.

Why I'm stuck between these three...

Symfony: I've programmed in PHP for back-end in a previous internship and may do so again in a few months.

Node.js: It's newer than PHP, and it's JavaScript where my front-end stack will be React and (likely) React Native.

Golang: It's newer than PHP, I've heard of its good performance, and it would be nice to learn a new (growing) language.

2.4M views2.4M
Comments
Filippo
Filippo

Aug 27, 2020

Review

In my humble opinion the best available php platform is "API Platform". I have tried a lot of backend frameworks in the last 10 years, and that is one of the best, at least in the PHP ecosystem. It's based on Symfony, it supports plenty of features like Swagger docs, Rest API, GraphQL. You can plugin React Admin to have a full admin in no time. But the best part in my opinion it's how you can easily extend the backend taking advantage of the ORM Doctrine (which is one of the most mature available across all technologies) and all the plugins of Symfony. The fact that the Doctrine entities are in automatic relation and they can be exposed as GraphQL it's a big win if you have a complex database. It is also possible to reverse engineering an existing database and create automatically all the entities, admin, restapi, graphql endpoints ... welcome to the future :)

45 views45
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Symfony
Symfony
Vapor
Vapor

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Vapor is the first true web framework for Swift. It provides a beautifully expressive foundation for your app without tying you to any single server implementation.

-
Pure Swift (No makefiles, module maps);Modular;Beautifully expressive
Statistics
GitHub Stars
30.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
9.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
8.5K
Stacks
117
Followers
6.2K
Followers
217
Votes
1.1K
Votes
65
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 177
    Open source
  • 149
    Php
  • 130
    Community
  • 129
    Dependency injection
  • 122
    Professional
Cons
  • 10
    Too many dependency
  • 8
    Lot of config files
  • 4
    YMAL
  • 3
    Feature creep
  • 1
    Bloated
Pros
  • 13
    Fast
  • 11
    Swift
  • 10
    Type-safe
  • 6
    Great for apis
  • 5
    Compiled to machine code
Cons
  • 1
    Server side swift is still in its infancy
  • 1
    Not as much support available.
Integrations
CakePHP
CakePHP
PHP
PHP
ReactPHP
ReactPHP
Swift
Swift

What are some alternatives to Symfony, Vapor?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase