Alternatives to Twig logo

Alternatives to Twig

Blade, React, Mustache, Handlebars.js, and Liquid are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Twig.
306
155
+ 1
8

What is Twig and what are its top alternatives?

Twig is a popular templating engine for PHP that allows developers to create clean, efficient, and secure templates for their web applications. It features a syntax that is easy to read and write, with support for template inheritance, macros, and filters. However, Twig can be slow for large projects and may have a learning curve for beginners.

  1. Blade: Blade is the templating engine used in the Laravel PHP framework. It offers a simple syntax for creating templates, with features like template inheritance, control structures, and more. Pros: easy to learn, integrates well with Laravel. Cons: tied to the Laravel framework.

  2. Smarty: Smarty is a template engine for PHP that aims to separate application logic from presentation. It provides caching, internationalization support, and other features. Pros: good performance, well-established. Cons: can be complex for simple projects.

  3. Mustache: Mustache is a logic-less template engine that can be used in multiple programming languages. It focuses on simplicity and readability in its syntax. Pros: supports multiple languages, easy to learn. Cons: lacks advanced features compared to other engines.

  4. Handlebars.js: Handlebars.js is a JavaScript templating engine that simplifies the process of generating HTML. It supports data binding, helpers, and partials. Pros: works well with JavaScript, easy to use. Cons: limited in functionality compared to other engines.

  5. EJS: EJS is a simple templating language that lets you embed JavaScript code within HTML templates. It is easy to use and offers features like includes and loops. Pros: integrates well with JavaScript, good for small projects. Cons: may be too basic for complex applications.

  6. Nunjucks: Nunjucks is a templating engine for JavaScript inspired by Jinja2 (Python templating engine). It offers features like template inheritance, filters, and control structures. Pros: powerful and flexible, works well with Node.js. Cons: may have a learning curve for beginners.

  7. Pug: Formerly known as Jade, Pug is a high-performance template engine for Node.js. It uses indentation to define HTML structure and offers features like mixins and filters. Pros: clean and concise syntax, good performance. Cons: may not be as widely adopted as other engines.

  8. Vash: Vash is a template engine for Node.js inspired by Razor (ASP.NET). It aims to be simple and intuitive, with features like partials, loops, and conditional statements. Pros: lightweight and fast, good for server-side rendering. Cons: limited in advanced features compared to other engines.

  9. Liquid: Liquid is an open-source template language created by Shopify. It offers a simple syntax for creating dynamic content in web pages. Pros: easy to learn, flexible and extensible. Cons: may lack some features compared to other engines.

  10. Haml: Haml is a templating engine for Ruby that focuses on creating clean and readable markup. It uses indentation to define HTML structure and supports features like partials and filters. Pros: concise syntax, easy to maintain. Cons: may not be as popular outside of the Ruby community.

Top Alternatives to Twig

  • Blade
    Blade

    It is a pursuit of simple, efficient Web framework, so that JavaWeb development becomes even more powerful, both in performance and flexibility. ...

  • React
    React

    Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project. ...

  • Mustache
    Mustache

    Mustache is a logic-less template syntax. It can be used for HTML, config files, source code - anything. It works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a hash or object. We call it "logic-less" because there are no if statements, else clauses, or for loops. Instead there are only tags. Some tags are replaced with a value, some nothing, and others a series of values. ...

  • Handlebars.js
    Handlebars.js

    Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be. ...

  • Liquid
    Liquid

    It is an open-source template language written in Ruby. It is the backbone of Shopify themes and is used to load dynamic content on storefronts. It is safe, customer facing template language for flexible web apps. ...

  • JavaScript
    JavaScript

    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. ...

  • Git
    Git

    Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. ...

  • GitHub
    GitHub

    GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together. ...

Twig alternatives & related posts

Blade logo

Blade

46
79
0
Lightning fast and elegant mvc framework for Java8
46
79
+ 1
0
PROS OF BLADE
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF BLADE
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Blade posts

      React logo

      React

      170.4K
      140.7K
      4.1K
      A JavaScript library for building user interfaces
      170.4K
      140.7K
      + 1
      4.1K
      PROS OF REACT
      • 830
        Components
      • 672
        Virtual dom
      • 578
        Performance
      • 508
        Simplicity
      • 442
        Composable
      • 186
        Data flow
      • 166
        Declarative
      • 128
        Isn't an mvc framework
      • 120
        Reactive updates
      • 115
        Explicit app state
      • 50
        JSX
      • 29
        Learn once, write everywhere
      • 22
        Easy to Use
      • 21
        Uni-directional data flow
      • 17
        Works great with Flux Architecture
      • 11
        Great perfomance
      • 10
        Javascript
      • 9
        Built by Facebook
      • 8
        TypeScript support
      • 6
        Speed
      • 6
        Server Side Rendering
      • 5
        Feels like the 90s
      • 5
        Excellent Documentation
      • 5
        Props
      • 5
        Functional
      • 5
        Easy as Lego
      • 5
        Closer to standard JavaScript and HTML than others
      • 5
        Cross-platform
      • 5
        Easy to start
      • 5
        Hooks
      • 5
        Awesome
      • 5
        Scalable
      • 4
        Super easy
      • 4
        Allows creating single page applications
      • 4
        Server side views
      • 4
        Sdfsdfsdf
      • 4
        Start simple
      • 4
        Strong Community
      • 4
        Fancy third party tools
      • 4
        Scales super well
      • 3
        Has arrow functions
      • 3
        Beautiful and Neat Component Management
      • 3
        Just the View of MVC
      • 3
        Simple, easy to reason about and makes you productive
      • 3
        Fast evolving
      • 3
        SSR
      • 3
        Great migration pathway for older systems
      • 3
        Rich ecosystem
      • 3
        Simple
      • 3
        Has functional components
      • 3
        Every decision architecture wise makes sense
      • 3
        Very gentle learning curve
      • 2
        Split your UI into components with one true state
      • 2
        Recharts
      • 2
        Permissively-licensed
      • 2
        Fragments
      • 2
        Sharable
      • 2
        Image upload
      • 2
        HTML-like
      • 1
        React hooks
      • 1
        Datatables
      CONS OF REACT
      • 41
        Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
      • 30
        No predefined way to structure your app
      • 29
        Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
      • 13
        JSX
      • 10
        Not enterprise friendly
      • 6
        One-way binding only
      • 3
        State consistency with backend neglected
      • 3
        Bad Documentation
      • 2
        Error boundary is needed
      • 2
        Paradigms change too fast

      related React posts

      Johnny Bell

      I was building a personal project that I needed to store items in a real time database. I am more comfortable with my Frontend skills than my backend so I didn't want to spend time building out anything in Ruby or Go.

      I stumbled on Firebase by #Google, and it was really all I needed. It had realtime data, an area for storing file uploads and best of all for the amount of data I needed it was free!

      I built out my application using tools I was familiar with, React for the framework, Redux.js to manage my state across components, and styled-components for the styling.

      Now as this was a project I was just working on in my free time for fun I didn't really want to pay for hosting. I did some research and I found Netlify. I had actually seen them at #ReactRally the year before and deployed a Gatsby site to Netlify already.

      Netlify was very easy to setup and link to my GitHub account you select a repo and pretty much with very little configuration you have a live site that will deploy every time you push to master.

      With the selection of these tools I was able to build out my application, connect it to a realtime database, and deploy to a live environment all with $0 spent.

      If you're looking to build out a small app I suggest giving these tools a go as you can get your idea out into the real world for absolutely no cost.

      See more
      Zach Holman

      Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

      But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

      But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

      Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

      See more
      Mustache logo

      Mustache

      2K
      414
      50
      Logic-less templates
      2K
      414
      + 1
      50
      PROS OF MUSTACHE
      • 29
        Dead simple templating
      • 12
        Open source
      • 8
        Small
      • 1
        Support in lots of languages
      CONS OF MUSTACHE
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Mustache posts

        Handlebars.js logo

        Handlebars.js

        7.8K
        3.2K
        308
        Minimal Templating on Steroids
        7.8K
        3.2K
        + 1
        308
        PROS OF HANDLEBARS.JS
        • 106
          Simple
        • 76
          Great templating language
        • 50
          Open source
        • 36
          Logicless
        • 20
          Integrates well into any codebase
        • 10
          Easy to create helper methods for complex scenarios
        • 7
          Created by Yehuda Katz
        • 2
          Easy For Fornt End Developers,learn backend
        • 1
          Awesome
        CONS OF HANDLEBARS.JS
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Handlebars.js posts

          Asad Gilani
          Software Engineer at Lisec Automation · | 5 upvotes · 211.3K views
          Shared insights
          on
          Handlebars.jsHandlebars.js.NET.NET

          @All: I am searching for the best template engine for .NET. I started looking into several template engines, including the Dotliquid, Handlebars.js, Scriban, and Razorlight. I found handlebar a bit difficult to use when using the loops and condition because you need to register for helper first. DotLiquid and Scriban were easy to use and in Razorlight I did not find the example for loops.

          Can you please suggest which template engine is best suited for the use of conditional/list and looping and why? Or if anybody could provide me a resource or link where I can compare which is best?

          Thanks In Advance

          See more
          Liquid logo

          Liquid

          208
          122
          0
          Open-source template language written in Ruby
          208
          122
          + 1
          0
          PROS OF LIQUID
            Be the first to leave a pro
            CONS OF LIQUID
              Be the first to leave a con

              related Liquid posts

              JavaScript logo

              JavaScript

              354.2K
              269.4K
              8.1K
              Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions
              354.2K
              269.4K
              + 1
              8.1K
              PROS OF JAVASCRIPT
              • 1.7K
                Can be used on frontend/backend
              • 1.5K
                It's everywhere
              • 1.2K
                Lots of great frameworks
              • 897
                Fast
              • 745
                Light weight
              • 425
                Flexible
              • 392
                You can't get a device today that doesn't run js
              • 286
                Non-blocking i/o
              • 237
                Ubiquitousness
              • 191
                Expressive
              • 55
                Extended functionality to web pages
              • 49
                Relatively easy language
              • 46
                Executed on the client side
              • 30
                Relatively fast to the end user
              • 25
                Pure Javascript
              • 21
                Functional programming
              • 15
                Async
              • 13
                Full-stack
              • 12
                Setup is easy
              • 12
                Future Language of The Web
              • 12
                Its everywhere
              • 11
                Because I love functions
              • 11
                JavaScript is the New PHP
              • 10
                Like it or not, JS is part of the web standard
              • 9
                Expansive community
              • 9
                Everyone use it
              • 9
                Can be used in backend, frontend and DB
              • 9
                Easy
              • 8
                Most Popular Language in the World
              • 8
                Powerful
              • 8
                Can be used both as frontend and backend as well
              • 8
                For the good parts
              • 8
                No need to use PHP
              • 8
                Easy to hire developers
              • 7
                Agile, packages simple to use
              • 7
                Love-hate relationship
              • 7
                Photoshop has 3 JS runtimes built in
              • 7
                Evolution of C
              • 7
                It's fun
              • 7
                Hard not to use
              • 7
                Versitile
              • 7
                Its fun and fast
              • 7
                Nice
              • 7
                Popularized Class-Less Architecture & Lambdas
              • 7
                Supports lambdas and closures
              • 6
                It let's me use Babel & Typescript
              • 6
                Can be used on frontend/backend/Mobile/create PRO Ui
              • 6
                1.6K Can be used on frontend/backend
              • 6
                Client side JS uses the visitors CPU to save Server Res
              • 6
                Easy to make something
              • 5
                Clojurescript
              • 5
                Promise relationship
              • 5
                Stockholm Syndrome
              • 5
                Function expressions are useful for callbacks
              • 5
                Scope manipulation
              • 5
                Everywhere
              • 5
                Client processing
              • 5
                What to add
              • 4
                Because it is so simple and lightweight
              • 4
                Only Programming language on browser
              • 1
                Test
              • 1
                Hard to learn
              • 1
                Test2
              • 1
                Not the best
              • 1
                Easy to understand
              • 1
                Subskill #4
              • 1
                Easy to learn
              • 0
                Hard 彤
              CONS OF JAVASCRIPT
              • 22
                A constant moving target, too much churn
              • 20
                Horribly inconsistent
              • 15
                Javascript is the New PHP
              • 9
                No ability to monitor memory utilitization
              • 8
                Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
              • 7
                Thinks strange results are better than errors
              • 6
                Can be ugly
              • 3
                No GitHub
              • 2
                Slow
              • 0
                HORRIBLE DOCUMENTS, faulty code, repo has bugs

              related JavaScript posts

              Zach Holman

              Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

              But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

              But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

              Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

              See more
              Conor Myhrvold
              Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 11.2M views

              How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

              Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

              Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

              https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

              (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

              Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

              See more
              Git logo

              Git

              293.4K
              175.6K
              6.6K
              Fast, scalable, distributed revision control system
              293.4K
              175.6K
              + 1
              6.6K
              PROS OF GIT
              • 1.4K
                Distributed version control system
              • 1.1K
                Efficient branching and merging
              • 959
                Fast
              • 845
                Open source
              • 726
                Better than svn
              • 368
                Great command-line application
              • 306
                Simple
              • 291
                Free
              • 232
                Easy to use
              • 222
                Does not require server
              • 27
                Distributed
              • 22
                Small & Fast
              • 18
                Feature based workflow
              • 15
                Staging Area
              • 13
                Most wide-spread VSC
              • 11
                Role-based codelines
              • 11
                Disposable Experimentation
              • 7
                Frictionless Context Switching
              • 6
                Data Assurance
              • 5
                Efficient
              • 4
                Just awesome
              • 3
                Github integration
              • 3
                Easy branching and merging
              • 2
                Compatible
              • 2
                Flexible
              • 2
                Possible to lose history and commits
              • 1
                Rebase supported natively; reflog; access to plumbing
              • 1
                Light
              • 1
                Team Integration
              • 1
                Fast, scalable, distributed revision control system
              • 1
                Easy
              • 1
                Flexible, easy, Safe, and fast
              • 1
                CLI is great, but the GUI tools are awesome
              • 1
                It's what you do
              • 0
                Phinx
              CONS OF GIT
              • 16
                Hard to learn
              • 11
                Inconsistent command line interface
              • 9
                Easy to lose uncommitted work
              • 7
                Worst documentation ever possibly made
              • 5
                Awful merge handling
              • 3
                Unexistent preventive security flows
              • 3
                Rebase hell
              • 2
                When --force is disabled, cannot rebase
              • 2
                Ironically even die-hard supporters screw up badly
              • 1
                Doesn't scale for big data

              related Git posts

              Simon Reymann
              Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 30 upvotes · 9.9M views

              Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

              • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
              • Respectively Git as revision control system
              • SourceTree as Git GUI
              • Visual Studio Code as IDE
              • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
              • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
              • SonarQube as quality gate
              • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
              • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
              • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
              • Heroku for deploying in test environments
              • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
              • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
              • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
              • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
              • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

              The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

              • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
              • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
              • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
              • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
              • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
              • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
              See more
              Tymoteusz Paul
              Devops guy at X20X Development LTD · | 23 upvotes · 8.9M views

              Often enough I have to explain my way of going about setting up a CI/CD pipeline with multiple deployment platforms. Since I am a bit tired of yapping the same every single time, I've decided to write it up and share with the world this way, and send people to read it instead ;). I will explain it on "live-example" of how the Rome got built, basing that current methodology exists only of readme.md and wishes of good luck (as it usually is ;)).

              It always starts with an app, whatever it may be and reading the readmes available while Vagrant and VirtualBox is installing and updating. Following that is the first hurdle to go over - convert all the instruction/scripts into Ansible playbook(s), and only stopping when doing a clear vagrant up or vagrant reload we will have a fully working environment. As our Vagrant environment is now functional, it's time to break it! This is the moment to look for how things can be done better (too rigid/too lose versioning? Sloppy environment setup?) and replace them with the right way to do stuff, one that won't bite us in the backside. This is the point, and the best opportunity, to upcycle the existing way of doing dev environment to produce a proper, production-grade product.

              I should probably digress here for a moment and explain why. I firmly believe that the way you deploy production is the same way you should deploy develop, shy of few debugging-friendly setting. This way you avoid the discrepancy between how production work vs how development works, which almost always causes major pains in the back of the neck, and with use of proper tools should mean no more work for the developers. That's why we start with Vagrant as developer boxes should be as easy as vagrant up, but the meat of our product lies in Ansible which will do meat of the work and can be applied to almost anything: AWS, bare metal, docker, LXC, in open net, behind vpn - you name it.

              We must also give proper consideration to monitoring and logging hoovering at this point. My generic answer here is to grab Elasticsearch, Kibana, and Logstash. While for different use cases there may be better solutions, this one is well battle-tested, performs reasonably and is very easy to scale both vertically (within some limits) and horizontally. Logstash rules are easy to write and are well supported in maintenance through Ansible, which as I've mentioned earlier, are at the very core of things, and creating triggers/reports and alerts based on Elastic and Kibana is generally a breeze, including some quite complex aggregations.

              If we are happy with the state of the Ansible it's time to move on and put all those roles and playbooks to work. Namely, we need something to manage our CI/CD pipelines. For me, the choice is obvious: TeamCity. It's modern, robust and unlike most of the light-weight alternatives, it's transparent. What I mean by that is that it doesn't tell you how to do things, doesn't limit your ways to deploy, or test, or package for that matter. Instead, it provides a developer-friendly and rich playground for your pipelines. You can do most the same with Jenkins, but it has a quite dated look and feel to it, while also missing some key functionality that must be brought in via plugins (like quality REST API which comes built-in with TeamCity). It also comes with all the common-handy plugins like Slack or Apache Maven integration.

              The exact flow between CI and CD varies too greatly from one application to another to describe, so I will outline a few rules that guide me in it: 1. Make build steps as small as possible. This way when something breaks, we know exactly where, without needing to dig and root around. 2. All security credentials besides development environment must be sources from individual Vault instances. Keys to those containers should exist only on the CI/CD box and accessible by a few people (the less the better). This is pretty self-explanatory, as anything besides dev may contain sensitive data and, at times, be public-facing. Because of that appropriate security must be present. TeamCity shines in this department with excellent secrets-management. 3. Every part of the build chain shall consume and produce artifacts. If it creates nothing, it likely shouldn't be its own build. This way if any issue shows up with any environment or version, all developer has to do it is grab appropriate artifacts to reproduce the issue locally. 4. Deployment builds should be directly tied to specific Git branches/tags. This enables much easier tracking of what caused an issue, including automated identifying and tagging the author (nothing like automated regression testing!).

              Speaking of deployments, I generally try to keep it simple but also with a close eye on the wallet. Because of that, I am more than happy with AWS or another cloud provider, but also constantly peeking at the loads and do we get the value of what we are paying for. Often enough the pattern of use is not constantly erratic, but rather has a firm baseline which could be migrated away from the cloud and into bare metal boxes. That is another part where this approach strongly triumphs over the common Docker and CircleCI setup, where you are very much tied in to use cloud providers and getting out is expensive. Here to embrace bare-metal hosting all you need is a help of some container-based self-hosting software, my personal preference is with Proxmox and LXC. Following that all you must write are ansible scripts to manage hardware of Proxmox, similar way as you do for Amazon EC2 (ansible supports both greatly) and you are good to go. One does not exclude another, quite the opposite, as they can live in great synergy and cut your costs dramatically (the heavier your base load, the bigger the savings) while providing production-grade resiliency.

              See more
              GitHub logo

              GitHub

              281.5K
              245.7K
              10.3K
              Powerful collaboration, review, and code management for open source and private development projects
              281.5K
              245.7K
              + 1
              10.3K
              PROS OF GITHUB
              • 1.8K
                Open source friendly
              • 1.5K
                Easy source control
              • 1.3K
                Nice UI
              • 1.1K
                Great for team collaboration
              • 867
                Easy setup
              • 504
                Issue tracker
              • 486
                Great community
              • 483
                Remote team collaboration
              • 451
                Great way to share
              • 442
                Pull request and features planning
              • 147
                Just works
              • 132
                Integrated in many tools
              • 121
                Free Public Repos
              • 116
                Github Gists
              • 112
                Github pages
              • 83
                Easy to find repos
              • 62
                Open source
              • 60
                It's free
              • 60
                Easy to find projects
              • 56
                Network effect
              • 49
                Extensive API
              • 43
                Organizations
              • 42
                Branching
              • 34
                Developer Profiles
              • 32
                Git Powered Wikis
              • 30
                Great for collaboration
              • 24
                It's fun
              • 23
                Clean interface and good integrations
              • 22
                Community SDK involvement
              • 20
                Learn from others source code
              • 16
                Because: Git
              • 14
                It integrates directly with Azure
              • 10
                Standard in Open Source collab
              • 10
                Newsfeed
              • 8
                It integrates directly with Hipchat
              • 8
                Fast
              • 8
                Beautiful user experience
              • 7
                Easy to discover new code libraries
              • 6
                Smooth integration
              • 6
                Cloud SCM
              • 6
                Nice API
              • 6
                Graphs
              • 6
                Integrations
              • 6
                It's awesome
              • 5
                Quick Onboarding
              • 5
                Reliable
              • 5
                Remarkable uptime
              • 5
                CI Integration
              • 5
                Hands down best online Git service available
              • 4
                Uses GIT
              • 4
                Version Control
              • 4
                Simple but powerful
              • 4
                Unlimited Public Repos at no cost
              • 4
                Free HTML hosting
              • 4
                Security options
              • 4
                Loved by developers
              • 4
                Easy to use and collaborate with others
              • 3
                Ci
              • 3
                IAM
              • 3
                Nice to use
              • 3
                Easy deployment via SSH
              • 2
                Easy to use
              • 2
                Leads the copycats
              • 2
                All in one development service
              • 2
                Free private repos
              • 2
                Free HTML hostings
              • 2
                Easy and efficient maintainance of the projects
              • 2
                Beautiful
              • 2
                Easy source control and everything is backed up
              • 2
                IAM integration
              • 2
                Very Easy to Use
              • 2
                Good tools support
              • 2
                Issues tracker
              • 2
                Never dethroned
              • 2
                Self Hosted
              • 1
                Dasf
              • 1
                Profound
              CONS OF GITHUB
              • 54
                Owned by micrcosoft
              • 38
                Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
              • 15
                Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
              • 10
                API scoping could be better
              • 9
                Only 3 collaborators for private repos
              • 4
                Limited featureset for issue management
              • 3
                Does not have a graph for showing history like git lens
              • 2
                GitHub Packages does not support SNAPSHOT versions
              • 1
                No multilingual interface
              • 1
                Takes a long time to commit
              • 1
                Expensive

              related GitHub posts

              Johnny Bell

              I was building a personal project that I needed to store items in a real time database. I am more comfortable with my Frontend skills than my backend so I didn't want to spend time building out anything in Ruby or Go.

              I stumbled on Firebase by #Google, and it was really all I needed. It had realtime data, an area for storing file uploads and best of all for the amount of data I needed it was free!

              I built out my application using tools I was familiar with, React for the framework, Redux.js to manage my state across components, and styled-components for the styling.

              Now as this was a project I was just working on in my free time for fun I didn't really want to pay for hosting. I did some research and I found Netlify. I had actually seen them at #ReactRally the year before and deployed a Gatsby site to Netlify already.

              Netlify was very easy to setup and link to my GitHub account you select a repo and pretty much with very little configuration you have a live site that will deploy every time you push to master.

              With the selection of these tools I was able to build out my application, connect it to a realtime database, and deploy to a live environment all with $0 spent.

              If you're looking to build out a small app I suggest giving these tools a go as you can get your idea out into the real world for absolutely no cost.

              See more

              Context: I wanted to create an end to end IoT data pipeline simulation in Google Cloud IoT Core and other GCP services. I never touched Terraform meaningfully until working on this project, and it's one of the best explorations in my development career. The documentation and syntax is incredibly human-readable and friendly. I'm used to building infrastructure through the google apis via Python , but I'm so glad past Sung did not make that decision. I was tempted to use Google Cloud Deployment Manager, but the templates were a bit convoluted by first impression. I'm glad past Sung did not make this decision either.

              Solution: Leveraging Google Cloud Build Google Cloud Run Google Cloud Bigtable Google BigQuery Google Cloud Storage Google Compute Engine along with some other fun tools, I can deploy over 40 GCP resources using Terraform!

              Check Out My Architecture: CLICK ME

              Check out the GitHub repo attached

              See more