Alternatives to Vuforia logo

Alternatives to Vuforia

Wikitude, TensorFlow, OpenCV, jQuery, and React are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Vuforia.
39
50
+ 1
0

What is Vuforia and what are its top alternatives?

Vuforia is an augmented reality (AR) platform that enables developers to create AR experiences for mobile devices. Key features of Vuforia include image recognition, object recognition, text recognition, and cloud recognition. However, Vuforia has limitations in terms of pricing, limited SDK support, and occasional tracking issues.

  1. ARCore: ARCore is a platform developed by Google that allows developers to build AR applications for Android devices. Key features include motion tracking, environmental understanding, and light estimation. Pros of ARCore include multi-platform support and frequent updates, while cons include limited device compatibility compared to Vuforia.
  2. ARKit: ARKit is Apple's AR platform for iOS devices. It features camera scene understanding, simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM), and occlusion handling. Pros of ARKit include seamless integration with iOS devices, while cons include limited compatibility with non-Apple devices.
  3. EasyAR: EasyAR is a cross-platform AR development tool that supports iOS, Android, and Windows. Key features include image recognition, 3D tracking, and cloud recognition. Pros of EasyAR include easy integration and affordable pricing, while cons include limited advanced features compared to Vuforia.
  4. Wikitude: Wikitude is an AR development platform that offers features like instant tracking, object tracking, and location-based AR. Pros of Wikitude include a robust feature set and excellent markerless tracking, while cons include higher pricing compared to Vuforia.
  5. Maxst: Maxst is an AR SDK that provides features like image recognition, instant tracking, and smart glass support. Pros of Maxst include excellent tracking performance and cost-effective pricing, while cons include limited platform support compared to Vuforia.
  6. ZapWorks: ZapWorks is an AR creation tool that offers features like image tracking, world tracking, and scripting capabilities. Pros of ZapWorks include a user-friendly interface and a variety of templates, while cons include limited customization options compared to Vuforia.
  7. EchoAR: EchoAR is a cloud platform for managing and hosting AR assets and content. Key features include content management, cross-platform support, and real-time updates. Pros of EchoAR include easy content deployment and scalability, while cons include dependency on a cloud-based infrastructure.
  8. Kudan: Kudan is an AR SDK that offers features like object tracking, markerless tracking, and SLAM. Pros of Kudan include robust tracking capabilities and cross-platform support, while cons include a steeper learning curve compared to Vuforia.
  9. Xzimg: Xzimg is an AR SDK that provides features like image recognition, markerless tracking, and facial recognition. Pros of Xzimg include advanced tracking algorithms and real-time performance, while cons include limited documentation compared to Vuforia.
  10. Augment: Augment is an AR platform for retailers and e-commerce businesses to create AR shopping experiences. Key features include 3D modeling, scene creation, and real-time visualization. Pros of Augment include industry-specific solutions and easy integration, while cons include limited customization options compared to Vuforia.

Top Alternatives to Vuforia

  • Wikitude
    Wikitude

    It is a library for location based AR, image recognition and tracking for Android, iOS and Smart glasses. ...

  • TensorFlow
    TensorFlow

    TensorFlow is an open source software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. Nodes in the graph represent mathematical operations, while the graph edges represent the multidimensional data arrays (tensors) communicated between them. The flexible architecture allows you to deploy computation to one or more CPUs or GPUs in a desktop, server, or mobile device with a single API. ...

  • OpenCV
    OpenCV

    OpenCV was designed for computational efficiency and with a strong focus on real-time applications. Written in optimized C/C++, the library can take advantage of multi-core processing. Enabled with OpenCL, it can take advantage of the hardware acceleration of the underlying heterogeneous compute platform. ...

  • jQuery
    jQuery

    jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML. ...

  • React
    React

    Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project. ...

  • AngularJS
    AngularJS

    AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding. ...

  • Vue.js
    Vue.js

    It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API. ...

  • jQuery UI
    jQuery UI

    Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice. ...

Vuforia alternatives & related posts

Wikitude logo

Wikitude

12
0
Mobile AR tech provider for smartphones, tablets & digital eyewear
12
0
PROS OF WIKITUDE
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF WIKITUDE
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Wikitude posts

      TensorFlow logo

      TensorFlow

      3.8K
      106
      Open Source Software Library for Machine Intelligence
      3.8K
      106
      PROS OF TENSORFLOW
      • 32
        High Performance
      • 19
        Connect Research and Production
      • 16
        Deep Flexibility
      • 12
        Auto-Differentiation
      • 11
        True Portability
      • 6
        Easy to use
      • 5
        High level abstraction
      • 5
        Powerful
      CONS OF TENSORFLOW
      • 9
        Hard
      • 6
        Hard to debug
      • 2
        Documentation not very helpful

      related TensorFlow posts

      Tom Klein

      Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

      See more
      Conor Myhrvold
      Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 8 upvotes · 2.8M views

      Why we built an open source, distributed training framework for TensorFlow , Keras , and PyTorch:

      At Uber, we apply deep learning across our business; from self-driving research to trip forecasting and fraud prevention, deep learning enables our engineers and data scientists to create better experiences for our users.

      TensorFlow has become a preferred deep learning library at Uber for a variety of reasons. To start, the framework is one of the most widely used open source frameworks for deep learning, which makes it easy to onboard new users. It also combines high performance with an ability to tinker with low-level model details—for instance, we can use both high-level APIs, such as Keras, and implement our own custom operators using NVIDIA’s CUDA toolkit.

      Uber has introduced Michelangelo (https://eng.uber.com/michelangelo/), an internal ML-as-a-service platform that democratizes machine learning and makes it easy to build and deploy these systems at scale. In this article, we pull back the curtain on Horovod, an open source component of Michelangelo’s deep learning toolkit which makes it easier to start—and speed up—distributed deep learning projects with TensorFlow:

      https://eng.uber.com/horovod/

      (Direct GitHub repo: https://github.com/uber/horovod)

      See more
      OpenCV logo

      OpenCV

      1.3K
      101
      Open Source Computer Vision Library
      1.3K
      101
      PROS OF OPENCV
      • 37
        Computer Vision
      • 18
        Open Source
      • 12
        Imaging
      • 10
        Face Detection
      • 10
        Machine Learning
      • 6
        Great community
      • 4
        Realtime Image Processing
      • 2
        Helping almost CV problem
      • 2
        Image Augmentation
      CONS OF OPENCV
        Be the first to leave a con

        related OpenCV posts

        Shared insights
        on
        FFMPEGFFMPEGOpenCVOpenCV

        Hi Team,

        Could you please suggest which one need to be used in between OpenCV and FFMPEG.

        Thank you in Advance.

        See more
        jQuery logo

        jQuery

        191.9K
        6.6K
        The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.
        191.9K
        6.6K
        PROS OF JQUERY
        • 1.3K
          Cross-browser
        • 957
          Dom manipulation
        • 809
          Power
        • 660
          Open source
        • 610
          Plugins
        • 459
          Easy
        • 395
          Popular
        • 350
          Feature-rich
        • 281
          Html5
        • 227
          Light weight
        • 93
          Simple
        • 84
          Great community
        • 79
          CSS3 Compliant
        • 69
          Mobile friendly
        • 67
          Fast
        • 43
          Intuitive
        • 42
          Swiss Army knife for webdev
        • 35
          Huge Community
        • 11
          Easy to learn
        • 4
          Clean code
        • 3
          Because of Ajax request :)
        • 2
          Powerful
        • 2
          Nice
        • 2
          Just awesome
        • 2
          Used everywhere
        • 1
          Improves productivity
        • 1
          Javascript
        • 1
          Easy Setup
        • 1
          Open Source, Simple, Easy Setup
        • 1
          It Just Works
        • 1
          Industry acceptance
        • 1
          Allows great manipulation of HTML and CSS
        • 1
          Widely Used
        • 1
          I love jQuery
        CONS OF JQUERY
        • 6
          Large size
        • 5
          Sometimes inconsistent API
        • 5
          Encourages DOM as primary data source
        • 2
          Live events is overly complex feature

        related jQuery posts

        Kir Shatrov
        Engineering Lead at Shopify · | 22 upvotes · 2.4M views

        The client-side stack of Shopify Admin has been a long journey. It started with HTML templates, jQuery and Prototype. We moved to Batman.js, our in-house Single-Page-Application framework (SPA), in 2013. Then, we re-evaluated our approach and moved back to statically rendered HTML and vanilla JavaScript. As the front-end ecosystem matured, we felt that it was time to rethink our approach again. Last year, we started working on moving Shopify Admin to React and TypeScript.

        Many things have changed since the days of jQuery and Batman. JavaScript execution is much faster. We can easily render our apps on the server to do less work on the client, and the resources and tooling for developers are substantially better with React than we ever had with Batman.

        #FrameworksFullStack #Languages

        See more
        Ganesa Vijayakumar
        Full Stack Coder | Technical Architect · | 19 upvotes · 5.5M views

        I'm planning to create a web application and also a mobile application to provide a very good shopping experience to the end customers. Shortly, my application will be aggregate the product details from difference sources and giving a clear picture to the user that when and where to buy that product with best in Quality and cost.

        I have planned to develop this in many milestones for adding N number of features and I have picked my first part to complete the core part (aggregate the product details from different sources).

        As per my work experience and knowledge, I have chosen the followings stacks to this mission.

        UI: I would like to develop this application using React, React Router and React Native since I'm a little bit familiar on this and also most importantly these will help on developing both web and mobile apps. In addition, I'm gonna use the stacks JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI, jQuery Mobile, Bootstrap wherever required.

        Service: I have planned to use Java as the main business layer language as I have 7+ years of experience on this I believe I can do better work using Java than other languages. In addition, I'm thinking to use the stacks Node.js.

        Database and ORM: I'm gonna pick MySQL as DB and Hibernate as ORM since I have a piece of good knowledge and also work experience on this combination.

        Search Engine: I need to deal with a large amount of product data and it's in-detailed info to provide enough details to end user at the same time I need to focus on the performance area too. so I have decided to use Solr as a search engine for product search and suggestions. In addition, I'm thinking to replace Solr by Elasticsearch once explored/reviewed enough about Elasticsearch.

        Host: As of now, my plan to complete the application with decent features first and deploy it in a free hosting environment like Docker and Heroku and then once it is stable then I have planned to use the AWS products Amazon S3, EC2, Amazon RDS and Amazon Route 53. I'm not sure about Microsoft Azure that what is the specialty in it than Heroku and Amazon EC2 Container Service. Anyhow, I will do explore these once again and pick the best suite one for my requirement once I reached this level.

        Build and Repositories: I have decided to choose Apache Maven and Git as these are my favorites and also so popular on respectively build and repositories.

        Additional Utilities :) - I would like to choose Codacy for code review as their Startup plan will be very helpful to this application. I'm already experienced with Google CheckStyle and SonarQube even I'm looking something on Codacy.

        Happy Coding! Suggestions are welcome! :)

        Thanks, Ganesa

        See more
        React logo

        React

        173.2K
        4.1K
        A JavaScript library for building user interfaces
        173.2K
        4.1K
        PROS OF REACT
        • 832
          Components
        • 673
          Virtual dom
        • 578
          Performance
        • 508
          Simplicity
        • 442
          Composable
        • 186
          Data flow
        • 166
          Declarative
        • 128
          Isn't an mvc framework
        • 120
          Reactive updates
        • 115
          Explicit app state
        • 50
          JSX
        • 29
          Learn once, write everywhere
        • 22
          Easy to Use
        • 21
          Uni-directional data flow
        • 17
          Works great with Flux Architecture
        • 11
          Great perfomance
        • 10
          Javascript
        • 9
          Built by Facebook
        • 8
          TypeScript support
        • 6
          Server Side Rendering
        • 6
          Speed
        • 5
          Feels like the 90s
        • 5
          Excellent Documentation
        • 5
          Props
        • 5
          Functional
        • 5
          Easy as Lego
        • 5
          Closer to standard JavaScript and HTML than others
        • 5
          Cross-platform
        • 5
          Easy to start
        • 5
          Hooks
        • 5
          Awesome
        • 5
          Scalable
        • 4
          Super easy
        • 4
          Allows creating single page applications
        • 4
          Server side views
        • 4
          Sdfsdfsdf
        • 4
          Start simple
        • 4
          Strong Community
        • 4
          Fancy third party tools
        • 4
          Scales super well
        • 3
          Has arrow functions
        • 3
          Beautiful and Neat Component Management
        • 3
          Just the View of MVC
        • 3
          Simple, easy to reason about and makes you productive
        • 3
          Fast evolving
        • 3
          SSR
        • 3
          Great migration pathway for older systems
        • 3
          Rich ecosystem
        • 3
          Simple
        • 3
          Has functional components
        • 3
          Every decision architecture wise makes sense
        • 3
          Very gentle learning curve
        • 2
          Split your UI into components with one true state
        • 2
          Image upload
        • 2
          Permissively-licensed
        • 2
          Fragments
        • 2
          Sharable
        • 2
          Recharts
        • 2
          HTML-like
        • 1
          React hooks
        • 1
          Datatables
        CONS OF REACT
        • 41
          Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
        • 30
          No predefined way to structure your app
        • 29
          Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
        • 13
          JSX
        • 10
          Not enterprise friendly
        • 6
          One-way binding only
        • 3
          State consistency with backend neglected
        • 3
          Bad Documentation
        • 2
          Error boundary is needed
        • 2
          Paradigms change too fast

        related React posts

        Johnny Bell

        I was building a personal project that I needed to store items in a real time database. I am more comfortable with my Frontend skills than my backend so I didn't want to spend time building out anything in Ruby or Go.

        I stumbled on Firebase by #Google, and it was really all I needed. It had realtime data, an area for storing file uploads and best of all for the amount of data I needed it was free!

        I built out my application using tools I was familiar with, React for the framework, Redux.js to manage my state across components, and styled-components for the styling.

        Now as this was a project I was just working on in my free time for fun I didn't really want to pay for hosting. I did some research and I found Netlify. I had actually seen them at #ReactRally the year before and deployed a Gatsby site to Netlify already.

        Netlify was very easy to setup and link to my GitHub account you select a repo and pretty much with very little configuration you have a live site that will deploy every time you push to master.

        With the selection of these tools I was able to build out my application, connect it to a realtime database, and deploy to a live environment all with $0 spent.

        If you're looking to build out a small app I suggest giving these tools a go as you can get your idea out into the real world for absolutely no cost.

        See more
        Collins Ogbuzuru
        Front-end dev at Evolve credit · | 38 upvotes · 266.1K views

        Your tech stack is solid for building a real-time messaging project.

        React and React Native are excellent choices for the frontend, especially if you want to have both web and mobile versions of your application share code.

        ExpressJS is an unopinionated framework that affords you the flexibility to use it's features at your term, which is a good start. However, I would recommend you explore Sails.js as well. Sails.js is built on top of Express.js and it provides additional features out of the box, especially the Websocket integration that your project requires.

        Don't forget to set up Graphql codegen, this would improve your dev experience (Add Typescript, if you can too).

        I don't know much about databases but you might want to consider using NO-SQL. I used Firebase real-time db and aws dynamo db on a few of my personal projects and I love they're easy to work with and offer more flexibility for a chat application.

        See more
        AngularJS logo

        AngularJS

        61K
        5.3K
        Superheroic JavaScript MVW Framework
        61K
        5.3K
        PROS OF ANGULARJS
        • 889
          Quick to develop
        • 589
          Great mvc
        • 573
          Powerful
        • 520
          Restful
        • 505
          Backed by google
        • 349
          Two-way data binding
        • 343
          Javascript
        • 329
          Open source
        • 307
          Dependency injection
        • 197
          Readable
        • 75
          Fast
        • 65
          Directives
        • 63
          Great community
        • 57
          Free
        • 38
          Extend html vocabulary
        • 29
          Components
        • 26
          Easy to test
        • 25
          Easy to learn
        • 24
          Easy to templates
        • 23
          Great documentation
        • 21
          Easy to start
        • 19
          Awesome
        • 18
          Light weight
        • 15
          Angular 2.0
        • 14
          Efficient
        • 14
          Javascript mvw framework
        • 14
          Great extensions
        • 11
          Easy to prototype with
        • 9
          High performance
        • 9
          Coffeescript
        • 8
          Two-way binding
        • 8
          Lots of community modules
        • 8
          Mvc
        • 7
          Easy to e2e
        • 7
          Clean and keeps code readable
        • 6
          One of the best frameworks
        • 6
          Easy for small applications
        • 5
          Works great with jquery
        • 5
          Fast development
        • 4
          I do not touch DOM
        • 4
          The two-way Data Binding is awesome
        • 3
          Hierarchical Data Structure
        • 3
          Be a developer, not a plumber.
        • 3
          Declarative programming
        • 3
          Typescript
        • 3
          Dart
        • 3
          Community
        • 2
          Fkin awesome
        • 2
          Opinionated in the right areas
        • 2
          Supports api , easy development
        • 2
          Common Place
        • 2
          Very very useful and fast framework for development
        • 2
          Linear learning curve
        • 2
          Great
        • 2
          Amazing community support
        • 2
          Readable code
        • 2
          Programming fun again
        • 2
          The powerful of binding, routing and controlling routes
        • 2
          Scopes
        • 2
          Consistency with backend architecture if using Nest
        • 1
          Fk react, all my homies hate react
        CONS OF ANGULARJS
        • 12
          Complex
        • 3
          Event Listener Overload
        • 3
          Dependency injection
        • 2
          Hard to learn
        • 2
          Learning Curve

        related AngularJS posts

        Simon Reymann
        Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 5.1M views

        Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

        • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
        • npm as package manager
        • NestJS as Node.js framework
        • TypeScript as programming language
        • ExpressJS as web server
        • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
        • Postman as a tool for API development
        • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
        • JSON Web Token for access token management

        The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

        • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
        • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
        • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
        • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
        See more
        Simon Reymann
        Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 24 upvotes · 4.9M views

        Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

        • Nuxt.js consisting of Vue CLI, Vue Router, vuex, Webpack and Sass (Bundler for HTML5, CSS 3), Babel (Transpiler for JavaScript),
        • Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed Vue.js components
        • Vuetify as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
        • TypeScript as programming language
        • Apollo / GraphQL (incl. GraphiQL) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
        • ESLint, TSLint and Prettier for coding style and code analyzes
        • Jest as testing framework
        • Google Fonts and Font Awesome for typography and icon toolkit
        • NativeScript-Vue for mobile development

        The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

        • Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
        • Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
        • Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
        • Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
        • Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
        • Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.
        See more
        Vue.js logo

        Vue.js

        54.3K
        1.6K
        A progressive framework for building user interfaces
        54.3K
        1.6K
        PROS OF VUE.JS
        • 294
          Simple and easy to start with
        • 230
          Good documentation
        • 196
          Components
        • 131
          Simple the best
        • 100
          Simplified AngularJS
        • 95
          Reactive
        • 78
          Intuitive APIs
        • 56
          Javascript
        • 52
          Changed my front end coding life
        • 48
          Configuration is smooth
        • 38
          Easy to learn
        • 36
          So much fun to use
        • 26
          Progressive
        • 22
          Virtual dom
        • 16
          Faster than bulldogs on hot tarmac
        • 12
          It's magic
        • 12
          Component is template, javascript and style in one
        • 10
          Light Weight
        • 10
          Perfomance
        • 9
          Best of Both Worlds
        • 8
          Application structure
        • 8
          Elegant design
        • 8
          Intuitive and easy to use
        • 8
          Without misleading licenses
        • 6
          Small learning curve
        • 6
          Good command line interface
        • 5
          Logicless templates
        • 5
          Single file components
        • 5
          Easy to integrate to HTML by inline-templates
        • 5
          Like Angular only quicker to get started with
        • 4
          High performance
        • 3
          Component based
        • 3
          Vuex
        • 3
          Bridge from Web Development to JS Development
        • 3
          Customer Render ending eg to HTML
        • 2
          Lots of documentation
        • 2
          Concise error messages
        • 2
          Supports several template languages
        • 2
          One-way data flow
        • 2
          Intuitive
        • 1
          GUI
        CONS OF VUE.JS
        • 9
          Less Common Place
        • 5
          YXMLvsHTML Markup
        • 3
          Don't support fragments
        • 3
          Only support programatically multiple root nodes

        related Vue.js posts

        Simon Reymann
        Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 5.1M views

        Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

        • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
        • npm as package manager
        • NestJS as Node.js framework
        • TypeScript as programming language
        • ExpressJS as web server
        • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
        • Postman as a tool for API development
        • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
        • JSON Web Token for access token management

        The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

        • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
        • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
        • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
        • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
        See more
        Johnny Bell
        Shared insights
        on
        Vue.jsVue.jsReactReact

        I've used both Vue.js and React and I would stick with React. I know that Vue.js seems easier to write and its much faster to pick up however as you mentioned above React has way more ready made components you can just plugin, and the community for React is very big.

        It might be a bit more of a steep learning curve for your friend to learn React over Vue.js but I think in the long run its the better option.

        See more
        jQuery UI logo

        jQuery UI

        40.4K
        899
        Curated set of user interface interactions, effects, widgets, and themes built on top of the jQuery JavaScript Library
        40.4K
        899
        PROS OF JQUERY UI
        • 215
          Ui components
        • 156
          Cross-browser
        • 121
          Easy
        • 100
          It's jquery
        • 81
          Open source
        • 57
          Widgets
        • 48
          Plugins
        • 46
          Popular
        • 39
          Datepicker
        • 23
          Great community
        • 7
          DOM Manipulation
        • 6
          Themes
        • 0
          Some good ui components
        CONS OF JQUERY UI
        • 1
          Does not contain charts or graphs

        related jQuery UI posts

        Ganesa Vijayakumar
        Full Stack Coder | Technical Architect · | 19 upvotes · 5.5M views

        I'm planning to create a web application and also a mobile application to provide a very good shopping experience to the end customers. Shortly, my application will be aggregate the product details from difference sources and giving a clear picture to the user that when and where to buy that product with best in Quality and cost.

        I have planned to develop this in many milestones for adding N number of features and I have picked my first part to complete the core part (aggregate the product details from different sources).

        As per my work experience and knowledge, I have chosen the followings stacks to this mission.

        UI: I would like to develop this application using React, React Router and React Native since I'm a little bit familiar on this and also most importantly these will help on developing both web and mobile apps. In addition, I'm gonna use the stacks JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI, jQuery Mobile, Bootstrap wherever required.

        Service: I have planned to use Java as the main business layer language as I have 7+ years of experience on this I believe I can do better work using Java than other languages. In addition, I'm thinking to use the stacks Node.js.

        Database and ORM: I'm gonna pick MySQL as DB and Hibernate as ORM since I have a piece of good knowledge and also work experience on this combination.

        Search Engine: I need to deal with a large amount of product data and it's in-detailed info to provide enough details to end user at the same time I need to focus on the performance area too. so I have decided to use Solr as a search engine for product search and suggestions. In addition, I'm thinking to replace Solr by Elasticsearch once explored/reviewed enough about Elasticsearch.

        Host: As of now, my plan to complete the application with decent features first and deploy it in a free hosting environment like Docker and Heroku and then once it is stable then I have planned to use the AWS products Amazon S3, EC2, Amazon RDS and Amazon Route 53. I'm not sure about Microsoft Azure that what is the specialty in it than Heroku and Amazon EC2 Container Service. Anyhow, I will do explore these once again and pick the best suite one for my requirement once I reached this level.

        Build and Repositories: I have decided to choose Apache Maven and Git as these are my favorites and also so popular on respectively build and repositories.

        Additional Utilities :) - I would like to choose Codacy for code review as their Startup plan will be very helpful to this application. I'm already experienced with Google CheckStyle and SonarQube even I'm looking something on Codacy.

        Happy Coding! Suggestions are welcome! :)

        Thanks, Ganesa

        See more
        Khauth György
        CTO at SalesAutopilot Kft. · | 12 upvotes · 572.3K views

        I'm the CTO of a marketing automation SaaS. Because of the continuously increasing load we moved to the AWSCloud. We are using more and more features of AWS: Amazon CloudWatch, Amazon SNS, Amazon CloudFront, Amazon Route 53 and so on.

        Our main Database is MySQL but for the hundreds of GB document data we use MongoDB more and more. We started to use Redis for cache and other time sensitive operations.

        On the front-end we use jQuery UI + Smarty but now we refactor our app to use Vue.js with Vuetify. Because our app is relatively complex we need to use vuex as well.

        On the development side we use GitHub as our main repo, Docker for local and server environment and Jenkins and AWS CodePipeline for Continuous Integration.

        See more