Wallaby.js vs WebdriverIO

Overview

Wallaby.js

Stacks10

Followers18

Votes0

WebdriverIO

Stacks426

Followers509

Votes40

GitHub Stars9.7K

Forks2.6K

Wallaby.js vs WebdriverIO: What are the differences?

What is Wallaby.js? Intelligent test runner for JavaScript with real-time code coverage and deep editor integration. It is an intelligent test runner for JavaScript that continuously runs your tests. It reports code coverage and other results directly to your code editor immediately as you change your code. Wallaby.js uses various tricks to run your tests as fast as possible, such as dependency analysis to only execute tests affected by your code changes and parallel test execution. It provides a huge productivity boost whether you are doing TDD/BDD or using any other approach.

What is WebdriverIO? Webdriver/Selenium 2.0 JavaScript bindings for Node.js. WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Wallaby.js and WebdriverIO belong to "Browser Testing" category of the tech stack.

WebdriverIO is an open source tool with 5.1K GitHub stars and 1.47K GitHub forks. Here's a link to WebdriverIO's open source repository on GitHub.

SuperAgendador.com, Soluto, and Shelf are some of the popular companies that use WebdriverIO, whereas Wallaby.js is used by Covve, Shelf, and Wuilt. WebdriverIO has a broader approval, being mentioned in 9 company stacks & 12 developers stacks; compared to Wallaby.js, which is listed in 3 company stacks and 3 developer stacks.

🔥 Trending in Testing Frameworks on StackShare

Rhesis AI Testing Frameworks

Rhesis AI

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

1

Advice on Wallaby.js, WebdriverIO

Esther

Feb 16, 2020

Needs adviceon

react-testing-library

Hi, I am starting out to test an application that is currently being developed - FE: React. BE: Node JS. I want the framework to be able to test all UI scenarios (from simple to complex) and also have the capability to test APIs. I also need to run tests across all OSs and Browsers (Windows, Mac, Android, iOS). I have also looked into react-testing-library and @TestProject.io. Any advice you can give as to which framework would be best and why would be so much appreciated! Thank you!!

96.5k views96.5k

Comments

Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Wallaby.js	WebdriverIO
It is an intelligent test runner for JavaScript that continuously runs your tests. It reports code coverage and other results directly to your code editor immediately as you change your code.	WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.
Continuous Testing and TDD/BDD for JavaScript, CoffeeScript and TypeScript, Webpack, Browserify, ES6, ES7, node.js, Jest	Extendable; Support for the WebDriver specification as well as to Appium; Easy Test Setup; Run tests on desktop and mobile, Command line interface
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 9.7K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 2.6K
Stacks 10	Stacks 426
Followers 18	Followers 509
Votes 0	Votes 40
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 11 Various integrations to vendors like Sauce Labs 10 Open Source 8 Great community 7 Easy to setup 4 Best solution for broad browser support Cons 8 High maintenance
Integrations
QUnit Jest Jasmine Mocha	Node.js Selenium

What are some alternatives to Wallaby.js, WebdriverIO?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.