Alternatives to AdonisJS logo

Alternatives to AdonisJS

Sails.js, NestJS, Laravel, FeathersJS, and LoopBack are the most popular alternatives and competitors to AdonisJS.
145
322
+ 1
70

What is AdonisJS and what are its top alternatives?

It is a Node.js Framework which is highly focused on developer ergonomics, stability and confidence.
AdonisJS is a tool in the Frameworks (Full Stack) category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to AdonisJS

  • Sails.js

    Sails.js

    Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture. ...

  • NestJS

    NestJS

    Nest is a framework for building efficient, scalable Node.js server-side applications. It uses progressive JavaScript, is built with TypeScript (preserves compatibility with pure JavaScript) and combines elements of OOP (Object Oriented Programming), FP (Functional Programming), and FRP (Functional Reactive Programming). Under the hood, Nest makes use of Express, but also, provides compatibility with a wide range of other libraries, like e.g. Fastify, allowing for easy use of the myriad third-party plugins which are available. ...

  • Laravel

    Laravel

    It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching. ...

  • FeathersJS

    FeathersJS

    Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins. ...

  • LoopBack

    LoopBack

    A highly-extensible, open-source Node.js framework that enables you to create dynamic end-to-end REST APIs with little or no coding. Connect to multiple data sources, write business logic in Node.js, glue on top of your existing services and data, connect using JS, iOS & Android SDKs. ...

  • Django

    Django

    Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design. ...

  • Node.js

    Node.js

    Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices. ...

  • ASP.NET

    ASP.NET

    .NET is a developer platform made up of tools, programming languages, and libraries for building many different types of applications. ...

AdonisJS alternatives & related posts

Sails.js logo

Sails.js

310
455
275
Realtime MVC Framework for Node.js
310
455
+ 1
275
PROS OF SAILS.JS
  • 47
    Data-driven apis
  • 45
    Waterline ORM
  • 35
    Mvc
  • 31
    Easy rest
  • 23
    Real-time
  • 19
    Open source
  • 18
    Service-oriented architecture
  • 17
    Scalable
  • 9
    Convension over configuration
  • 8
    Node machines and machinepacks
  • 8
    Rails-like asset pipeline
  • 6
    Easy route/controller generation
  • 5
    Ruby on Rails basic stuff for JS devs
  • 2
    CLI for scaffolding project pieces
  • 2
    WebSocket support
CONS OF SAILS.JS
  • 4
    Waterline ORM
  • 3
    Defaults to VueJS
  • 0
    Standard MVC

related Sails.js posts

NestJS logo

NestJS

1.2K
1.7K
274
A progressive Node.js framework for building efficient and scalable server-side applications by @kammysliwiec.
1.2K
1.7K
+ 1
274
PROS OF NESTJS
  • 46
    Powerful but super friendly to work with
  • 37
    Fast development
  • 35
    Easy to understand documentation
  • 31
    Angular style syntax for the backend
  • 29
    NodeJS ecosystem
  • 23
    Typescript
  • 23
    Its easy to understand since it follows angular syntax
  • 14
    Good architecture
  • 11
    Integrates with Narwhal Extensions
  • 9
    Typescript makes it well integrated in vscode
  • 7
    Graphql support easy
  • 5
    Agnosticism
  • 4
    Easily integrate with others external extensions
CONS OF NESTJS
  • 7
    User base is small. Less help on Stackoverflow
  • 6
    Difficult to debug
  • 4
    Angular-like architecture
  • 2
    Updates with breaking changes
  • 1
    Unstable
  • 1
    Frontend in backend
  • 1
    Javascript

related NestJS posts

Simon Reymann
Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 25 upvotes · 2.1M views

Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

  • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
  • npm as package manager
  • NestJS as Node.js framework
  • TypeScript as programming language
  • ExpressJS as web server
  • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
  • Postman as a tool for API development
  • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
  • JSON Web Token for access token management

The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

  • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
  • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
  • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
  • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
See more
Slimane Deb

I am currently planning to build a project from scratch. I will be using Angular as front-end framework, but for the back-end I am not sure which framework to use between Spring Boot and NestJS. I have worked with Spring Boot before, but my new project contains a lot of I/O operations, in fact it will show a daily report. I thought about the new Spring Web Reactive Framework but given the idea that Node.js is the most popular on handling non blocking I/O I am planning to start learning NestJS since it is based on Angular philosophy and TypeScript which I am familiar with. Looking forward to hear from you dear Community.

See more
Laravel logo

Laravel

20.4K
16.3K
3.5K
A PHP Framework For Web Artisans
20.4K
16.3K
+ 1
3.5K
PROS OF LARAVEL
  • 514
    Clean architecture
  • 374
    Growing community
  • 348
    Composer friendly
  • 323
    Open source
  • 303
    The only framework to consider for php
  • 202
    Mvc
  • 195
    Quickly develop
  • 159
    Dependency injection
  • 147
    Application architecture
  • 134
    Embraces good community packages
  • 62
    Write less, do more
  • 55
    Restful routing
  • 52
    Orm (eloquent)
  • 47
    Artisan scaffolding and migrations
  • 47
    Database migrations & seeds
  • 36
    Awesome
  • 34
    Great documentation
  • 26
    Awsome, Powerfull, Fast and Rapid
  • 25
    Promotes elegant coding
  • 25
    Build Apps faster, easier and better
  • 22
    Easy to learn, scalability
  • 22
    JSON friendly
  • 21
    Eloquent ORM
  • 21
    Modern PHP
  • 21
    Most easy for me
  • 20
    Test-Driven
  • 19
    Blade Template
  • 18
    Beautiful
  • 13
    Security
  • 12
    Based on SOLID
  • 11
    Simple
  • 11
    Clean Documentation
  • 11
    Cool
  • 10
    Easy to attach Middleware
  • 10
    Convention over Configuration
  • 9
    Easy Request Validatin
  • 8
    Easy to use
  • 8
    Its just wow
  • 8
    Simpler
  • 8
    Get going quickly straight out of the box. BYOKDM
  • 8
    Laravel + Cassandra = Killer Framework
  • 8
    Fast
  • 7
    Less dependencies
  • 7
    Friendly API
  • 7
    Super easy and powerful
  • 7
    Simplistic , easy and faster
  • 6
    Great customer support
  • 6
    Its beautiful to code in
  • 5
    The only "cons" is wrong! No static method just Facades
  • 5
    Fast and Clarify framework
  • 5
    Active Record
  • 5
    Php7
  • 5
    Speed
  • 5
    Easy
  • 4
    Composer
  • 4
    Laravel Mix
  • 4
    Minimum system requirements
  • 4
    Easy views handling and great ORM
  • 4
    Eloquent
  • 4
    Laragon
  • 3
    Laravel Nova
  • 3
    Laravel casher
  • 3
    Laravel Passport
  • 3
    Ease of use
  • 3
    Cashier with Braintree and Stripe
  • 3
    Laravel Forge and Envoy
  • 3
    Laravel Horizon and Telescope
  • 3
    Laravel Spark
  • 3
    Intuitive usage
  • 2
    Heart touch
  • 2
    Like heart beat
  • 2
    Rapid development
  • 2
    Laravel love live long
  • 2
    Touch heart artisan
  • 2
    Scout
CONS OF LARAVEL
  • 42
    PHP
  • 28
    Too many dependency
  • 20
    Slower than the other two
  • 16
    A lot of static method calls for convenience
  • 13
    Too many include
  • 10
    Heavy
  • 7
    Bloated
  • 6
    Laravel
  • 5
    Confusing
  • 4
    Does not work well for file uploads in Shared Hosting
  • 4
    Too underrated
  • 2
    Not fast with MongoDB
  • 1
    Difficult to learn
  • 1
    Not using SOLID principles

related Laravel posts

I need to build a web application plus android and IOS apps for an enterprise, like an e-commerce portal. It will have intensive use of MySQL to display thousands (40-50k) of live product information in an interactive table (searchable, filterable), live delivery tracking. It has to be secure, as it will handle information on customers, sales, inventory. Here is the technology stack: Backend: Laravel 7 Frondend: Vue.js, React or AngularJS?

Need help deciding technology stack. Thanks.

See more
Antonio Sanchez

Back at the start of 2017, we decided to create a web-based tool for the SEO OnPage analysis of our clients' websites. We had over 2.000 websites to analyze, so we had to perform thousands of requests to get every single page from those websites, process the information and save the big amounts of data somewhere.

Very soon we realized that the initial chosen script language and database, PHP, Laravel and MySQL, was not going to be able to cope efficiently with such a task.

By that time, we were doing some experiments for other projects with a language we had recently get to know, Go , so we decided to get a try and code the crawler using it. It was fantastic, we could process much more data with way less CPU power and in less time. By using the concurrency abilites that the language has to offers, we could also do more Http requests in less time.

Unfortunately, I have no comparison numbers to show about the performance differences between Go and PHP since the difference was so clear from the beginning and that we didn't feel the need to do further comparison tests nor document it. We just switched fully to Go.

There was still a problem: despite the big amount of Data we were generating, MySQL was performing very well, but as we were adding more and more features to the software and with those features more and more different type of data to save, it was a nightmare for the database architects to structure everything correctly on the database, so it was clear what we had to do next: switch to a NoSQL database. So we switched to MongoDB, and it was also fantastic: we were expending almost zero time in thinking how to structure the Database and the performance also seemed to be better, but again, I have no comparison numbers to show due to the lack of time.

We also decided to switch the website from PHP and Laravel to JavaScript and Node.js and ExpressJS since working with the JSON Data that we were saving now in the Database would be easier.

As of now, we don't only use the tool intern but we also opened it for everyone to use for free: https://tool-seo.com

See more
FeathersJS logo

FeathersJS

149
288
51
Real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS
149
288
+ 1
51
PROS OF FEATHERSJS
  • 9
    Real-time
  • 5
    Choose any ORM
  • 5
    Datastore Agnostic
  • 5
    Flexible Plugins
  • 4
    Choose Socketio or Primus
  • 3
    Isomorphic Services API
  • 3
    Easy Rest
  • 3
    Open source
  • 2
    Scalable
  • 2
    Advanced Composable Service Middleware called holds
  • 2
    Data-driven APIs
  • 2
    Easy to use with Graphql
  • 2
    Uses express, will support other options soon
  • 2
    Service-oriented architecture
  • 2
    Documentation
CONS OF FEATHERSJS
  • 0
    Jh

related FeathersJS posts

Recently I have been working on an open source stack to help people consolidate their personal health data in a single database so that AI and analytics apps can be run against it to find personalized treatments. We chose to go with a #containerized approach leveraging Docker #containers with a local development environment setup with Docker Compose and nginx for container routing. For the production environment we chose to pull code from GitHub and build/push images using Jenkins and using Kubernetes to deploy to Amazon EC2.

We also implemented a dashboard app to handle user authentication/authorization, as well as a custom SSO server that runs on Heroku which allows experts to easily visit more than one instance without having to login repeatedly. The #Backend was implemented using my favorite #Stack which consists of FeathersJS on top of Node.js and ExpressJS with PostgreSQL as the main database. The #Frontend was implemented using React, Redux.js, Semantic UI React and the FeathersJS client. Though testing was light on this project, we chose to use AVA as well as ESLint to keep the codebase clean and consistent.

See more

Fontumi focuses on the development of telecommunications solutions. We have opted for technologies that allow agile development and great scalability.

Firebase and Node.js + FeathersJS are technologies that we have used on the server side. Vue.js is our main framework for clients.

Our latest products launched have been focused on the integration of AI systems for enriched conversations. Google Compute Engine , along with Dialogflow and Cloud Firestore have been important tools for this work.

Git + GitHub + Visual Studio Code is a killer stack.

See more
LoopBack logo

LoopBack

251
471
27
Build modern API applications that require complex integrations
251
471
+ 1
27
PROS OF LOOPBACK
  • 9
    Need a nodejs ReST-API, DB, AAA, Swagger? Then loopback
  • 8
    Easy Database Migration
  • 5
    Code generator
  • 3
    The future of API's
  • 2
    GraphQL
  • 0
    Typescript
CONS OF LOOPBACK
  • 7
    Community is slow
  • 1
    Backward compatibility

related LoopBack posts

Samuel Olugbemi
Software Engineer at Payzone UK · | 6 upvotes · 116.8K views
Shared insights
on
LoopBackLoopBackExpressJSExpressJS
at

I use LoopBack because it is: * It is truly and Unbelievably Extensible * it is default integrated with OpenAPI (Swagger) Spec Driven REST API * I write lesser codes, because most of the user stories have been covered using the code generation * It's documentation is more compact and well detailed than ExpressJS * It is very easy to learn, hence you can build a basic Rest API App in minutes * It has built in NPM packages required to build my Rest API which saves me time on installation and configuration * The Datasource/Service/Controller concept is just Brilliant (that's mostly all you need to get your app speaking with an External API services) * The support for SOAP and Rest API services is amazing!

See more
Shared insights
on
NestJSNestJSJestJestLoopBackLoopBack

We inherited this project and the backend is using LoopBack v3. I haven't taken a look at Loopback.io v4, but I'm planning to replace it. The reason being is that Loopback v3 documentation is a bit confusing and we are having trouble packaging the build using Webpack. Not to mention, integrating unit tests (latest Jest).

I still think Loopback is a great tool, but their documentation is really "messy" and hard to navigate through. There's also a constraint of time from our side. So what's the best option out there?

Should I try upgrading to Loopback v4, or trying other stuff? (i.e. NestJS)

Thanks!

See more
Django logo

Django

26.7K
23.6K
3.8K
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines
26.7K
23.6K
+ 1
3.8K
PROS OF DJANGO
  • 634
    Rapid development
  • 468
    Open source
  • 401
    Great community
  • 353
    Easy to learn
  • 263
    Mvc
  • 215
    Beautiful code
  • 210
    Elegant
  • 193
    Free
  • 191
    Great packages
  • 178
    Great libraries
  • 68
    Restful
  • 65
    Comes with auth and crud admin panel
  • 65
    Powerful
  • 60
    Great documentation
  • 58
    Great for web
  • 44
    Python
  • 37
    Great orm
  • 34
    Great for api
  • 27
    All included
  • 22
    Web Apps
  • 21
    Fast
  • 18
    Used by top startups
  • 16
    Clean
  • 15
    Easy setup
  • 15
    Sexy
  • 12
    Convention over configuration
  • 10
    ORM
  • 9
    The Django community
  • 9
    Allows for very rapid development with great libraries
  • 6
    Great MVC and templating engine
  • 6
    King of backend world
  • 6
    Its elegant and practical
  • 5
    Mvt
  • 5
    Batteries included
  • 5
    Full stack
  • 5
    Fast prototyping
  • 5
    Easy Structure , useful inbuilt library
  • 5
    Easy to develop end to end AI Models
  • 5
    Have not found anything that it can't do
  • 4
    Very quick to get something up and running
  • 4
    Easy to use
  • 4
    Easy
  • 4
    Cross-Platform
  • 3
    Map
  • 3
    Great peformance
  • 3
    Scaffold
  • 3
    Just the right level of abstraction
  • 3
    Modular
  • 3
    Full-Text Search
  • 3
    Zero code burden to change databases
  • 3
    Python community
  • 3
    Many libraries
  • 2
    Easy to change database manager
  • 1
    Node js
CONS OF DJANGO
  • 25
    Underpowered templating
  • 19
    Underpowered ORM
  • 19
    Autoreload restarts whole server
  • 15
    URL dispatcher ignores HTTP method
  • 10
    Internal subcomponents coupling
  • 7
    Admin
  • 7
    Not nodejs
  • 6
    Configuration hell
  • 4
    Not as clean and nice documentation like Laravel
  • 3
    Python
  • 3
    Not typed
  • 3
    Bloated admin panel included
  • 2
    Overwhelming folder structure
  • 1
    InEffective Multithreading

related Django posts

Dmitry Mukhin

Simple controls over complex technologies, as we put it, wouldn't be possible without neat UIs for our user areas including start page, dashboard, settings, and docs.

Initially, there was Django. Back in 2011, considering our Python-centric approach, that was the best choice. Later, we realized we needed to iterate on our website more quickly. And this led us to detaching Django from our front end. That was when we decided to build an SPA.

For building user interfaces, we're currently using React as it provided the fastest rendering back when we were building our toolkit. It’s worth mentioning Uploadcare is not a front-end-focused SPA: we aren’t running at high levels of complexity. If it were, we’d go with Ember.js.

However, there's a chance we will shift to the faster Preact, with its motto of using as little code as possible, and because it makes more use of browser APIs. One of our future tasks for our front end is to configure our Webpack bundler to split up the code for different site sections. For styles, we use PostCSS along with its plugins such as cssnano which minifies all the code.

All that allows us to provide a great user experience and quickly implement changes where they are needed with as little code as possible.

See more

Hey, so I developed a basic application with Python. But to use it, you need a python interpreter. I want to add a GUI to make it more appealing. What should I choose to develop a GUI? I have very basic skills in front end development (CSS, JavaScript). I am fluent in python. I'm looking for a tool that is easy to use and doesn't require too much code knowledge. I have recently tried out Flask, but it is kinda complicated. Should I stick with it, move to Django, or is there another nice framework to use?

See more
Node.js logo

Node.js

125.3K
103.8K
8.4K
A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications
125.3K
103.8K
+ 1
8.4K
PROS OF NODE.JS
  • 1.4K
    Npm
  • 1.3K
    Javascript
  • 1.1K
    Great libraries
  • 1K
    High-performance
  • 795
    Open source
  • 484
    Great for apis
  • 474
    Asynchronous
  • 420
    Great community
  • 390
    Great for realtime apps
  • 295
    Great for command line utilities
  • 81
    Node Modules
  • 80
    Websockets
  • 67
    Uber Simple
  • 57
    Great modularity
  • 56
    Allows us to reuse code in the frontend
  • 40
    Easy to start
  • 35
    Great for Data Streaming
  • 31
    Realtime
  • 26
    Awesome
  • 24
    Non blocking IO
  • 17
    Can be used as a proxy
  • 16
    High performance, open source, scalable
  • 15
    Non-blocking and modular
  • 14
    Easy and Fun
  • 12
    Easy and powerful
  • 12
    Same lang as AngularJS
  • 11
    Future of BackEnd
  • 10
    Fast
  • 9
    Fullstack
  • 9
    Scalability
  • 9
    Cross platform
  • 8
    Simple
  • 7
    Mean Stack
  • 6
    Great for webapps
  • 6
    Easy concurrency
  • 5
    Friendly
  • 5
    Fast, simple code and async
  • 5
    React
  • 4
    Great speed
  • 4
    Fast development
  • 4
    Its amazingly fast and scalable
  • 4
    Control everything
  • 4
    Easy to use and fast and goes well with JSONdb's
  • 4
    Typescript
  • 4
    Scalable
  • 3
    It's fast
  • 3
    Easy to use
  • 3
    Isomorphic coolness
  • 2
    Sooper easy for the Backend connectivity
  • 2
    Easy to learn
  • 2
    TypeScript Support
  • 2
    Scales, fast, simple, great community, npm, express
  • 2
    One language, end-to-end
  • 2
    Javascript2
  • 2
    Not Python
  • 2
    Performant and fast prototyping
  • 2
    Blazing fast
  • 2
    Great community
  • 2
    Less boilerplate code
  • 2
    Easy
  • 1
    Lovely
  • 1
    Event Driven
CONS OF NODE.JS
  • 46
    Bound to a single CPU
  • 42
    New framework every day
  • 35
    Lots of terrible examples on the internet
  • 29
    Asynchronous programming is the worst
  • 23
    Callback
  • 16
    Javascript
  • 11
    Dependency based on GitHub
  • 10
    Dependency hell
  • 10
    Low computational power
  • 7
    Can block whole server easily
  • 6
    Very very Slow
  • 6
    Callback functions may not fire on expected sequence
  • 3
    Unstable
  • 3
    Breaking updates
  • 3
    Unneeded over complication
  • 1
    No standard approach
  • 1
    Can't read server session
  • 1
    Bad transitive dependency management

related Node.js posts

Nick Rockwell
SVP, Engineering at Fastly · | 44 upvotes · 1.7M views

When I joined NYT there was already broad dissatisfaction with the LAMP (Linux Apache HTTP Server MySQL PHP) Stack and the front end framework, in particular. So, I wasn't passing judgment on it. I mean, LAMP's fine, you can do good work in LAMP. It's a little dated at this point, but it's not ... I didn't want to rip it out for its own sake, but everyone else was like, "We don't like this, it's really inflexible." And I remember from being outside the company when that was called MIT FIVE when it had launched. And been observing it from the outside, and I was like, you guys took so long to do that and you did it so carefully, and yet you're not happy with your decisions. Why is that? That was more the impetus. If we're going to do this again, how are we going to do it in a way that we're gonna get a better result?

So we're moving quickly away from LAMP, I would say. So, right now, the new front end is React based and using Apollo. And we've been in a long, protracted, gradual rollout of the core experiences.

React is now talking to GraphQL as a primary API. There's a Node.js back end, to the front end, which is mainly for server-side rendering, as well.

Behind there, the main repository for the GraphQL server is a big table repository, that we call Bodega because it's a convenience store. And that reads off of a Kafka pipeline.

See more
Conor Myhrvold
Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 39 upvotes · 4.2M views

How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

(GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

See more
ASP.NET logo

ASP.NET

21.4K
6.7K
14
An open source web framework for building modern web apps and services with .NET
21.4K
6.7K
+ 1
14
PROS OF ASP.NET
  • 11
    Great mvc
  • 3
    Easy to learn
CONS OF ASP.NET
  • 1
    Not highly flexible for advance Developers
  • 1
    Entity framework is very slow

related ASP.NET posts

Greg Neumann

Finding the most effective dev stack for a solo developer. Over the past year, I've been looking at many tech stacks that would be 'best' for me, as a solo, indie, developer to deliver a desktop app (Windows & Mac) plus mobile - iOS mainly. Initially, Xamarin started to stand-out. Using .NET Core as the run-time, Xamarin as the native API provider and Xamarin Forms for the UI seemed to solve all issues. But, the cracks soon started to appear. Xamarin Forms is mobile only; the Windows incarnation is different. There is no Mac UI solution (you have to code it natively in Mac OS Storyboard. I was also worried how Xamarin Forms , if I was to use it, was going to cope, in future, with Apple's new SwiftUI and Google's new Fuchsia.

This plethora of techs for the UI-layer made me reach for the safer waters of using Web-techs for the UI. Lovely! Consistency everywhere (well, mostly). But that consistency evaporates when platform issues are addressed. There are so many web frameworks!

But, I made a simple decision. It's just me...I am clever, but there is no army of coders here. And I have big plans for a business app. How could just 1 developer go-on to deploy a decent app to Windows, iPhone, iPad & Mac OS? I remembered earlier days when I've used Microsoft's ASP.NET to scaffold - generate - loads of Code for a web-app that I needed for several charities that I worked with. What 'generators' exist that do a lot of the platform-specific rubbish, allow the necessary customisation of such platform integration and provide a decent UI?

I've placed my colours to the Quasar Framework mast. Oh dear, that means Electron desktop apps doesn't it? Well, Ive had enough of loads of Developers saying that "the menus won't look native" or "it uses too much RAM" and so on. I've been using non-native UI-wrapped apps for ages - the date picker in Outlook on iOS is way better than the native date-picker and I'd been using it for years without getting hot under the collar about it. Developers do get so hung-up on things that busy Users hardly notice; don't you think?. As to the RAM usage issue; that's a bit true. But Users only really notice when an app uses so much RAM that the machine starts to page-out. Electron contributes towards that horizon but does not cause it. My Users will be business-users after all. Somewhat decent machines.

Looking forward to all that lovely Vue.js around my TypeScript and all those really, really, b e a u t I f u l UI controls of Quasar Framework . Still not sure that 1 dev can deliver all that... but I'm up for trying...

See more

Hi. We are planning to develop web, desktop, and mobile app for procurement, logistics, and contracts. Procure to Pay and Source to pay, spend management, supplier management, catalog management. ( similar to SAP Ariba, gap.com, coupa.com, ivalua.com vroozi.com, procurify.com

We got stuck when deciding which technology stack is good for the future. We look forward to your kind guidance that will help us.

We want to integrate with multiple databases with seamless bidirectional integration. What APIs and middleware available are best to achieve this? SAP HANA, Oracle, MySQL, MongoDB...

ASP.NET / Node.js / Laravel. ......?

Please guide us

See more