StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Task Scheduling
  4. Workflow Manager
  5. Airflow vs Digdag

Airflow vs Digdag

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Airflow
Airflow
Stacks1.7K
Followers2.8K
Votes128
Digdag
Digdag
Stacks17
Followers22
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.3K
Forks230

Airflow vs Digdag: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Airflow and Digdag

Airflow and Digdag are both workflow management platforms but they have key differences that set them apart from each other.

  1. Task Dependency: Airflow uses a directed acyclic graph (DAG) to represent dependencies between tasks, which allows for complex workflows with multiple task dependencies. Digdag, on the other hand, uses a simpler dependency model with one-to-one dependencies between tasks. This makes Airflow more suited for complex workflows with intricate dependencies.

  2. Execution Model: Airflow follows a pull-based execution model, where tasks are executed by workers that periodically poll the Airflow scheduler for new tasks. Digdag, on the other hand, uses a push-based execution model where tasks are executed immediately after their dependencies are satisfied. This makes Digdag more suited for real-time processing and low-latency workflows.

  3. Scripting Language: Airflow uses Python as its scripting language, allowing for a wide range of customizations and integrations with existing Python libraries and frameworks. Digdag, on the other hand, uses a proprietary YAML-based language for defining workflows, which limits the customizability and integrations compared to Airflow.

  4. Workflow Visualization: Airflow provides a web-based user interface that allows users to visualize the workflow dependencies and monitor the execution status of tasks. Digdag, on the other hand, lacks a dedicated web-based UI for workflow visualization and monitoring, making it less user-friendly for visualizing complex workflows.

  5. Community Ecosystem: Airflow has a larger and more active community compared to Digdag, with a vast number of plugins, integrations, and community-contributed resources available. Digdag's community ecosystem is relatively smaller, limiting the availability of plugins and integrations compared to Airflow.

  6. Maturity and Scalability: Airflow is a more mature and widely adopted workflow management system with a proven track record of large-scale deployments. Digdag, on the other hand, is a relatively newer and less mature platform with limited scalability features compared to Airflow.

In summary, Airflow and Digdag have key differences in their task dependency models, execution models, scripting languages, workflow visualization capabilities, community ecosystems, and maturity and scalability levels.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Airflow, Digdag

Anonymous
Anonymous

Jan 19, 2020

Needs advice

I am so confused. I need a tool that will allow me to go to about 10 different URLs to get a list of objects. Those object lists will be hundreds or thousands in length. I then need to get detailed data lists about each object. Those detailed data lists can have hundreds of elements that could be map/reduced somehow. My batch process dies sometimes halfway through which means hours of processing gone, i.e. time wasted. I need something like a directed graph that will keep results of successful data collection and allow me either pragmatically or manually to retry the failed ones some way (0 - forever) times. I want it to then process all the ones that have succeeded or been effectively ignored and load the data store with the aggregation of some couple thousand data-points. I know hitting this many endpoints is not a good practice but I can't put collectors on all the endpoints or anything like that. It is pretty much the only way to get the data.

294k views294k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Airflow
Airflow
Digdag
Digdag

Use Airflow to author workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks. The Airflow scheduler executes your tasks on an array of workers while following the specified dependencies. Rich command lines utilities makes performing complex surgeries on DAGs a snap. The rich user interface makes it easy to visualize pipelines running in production, monitor progress and troubleshoot issues when needed.

It is a simple tool that helps you to build, run, schedule, and monitor complex pipelines of tasks. It handles dependency resolution so that tasks run in series or in parallel.

Dynamic: Airflow pipelines are configuration as code (Python), allowing for dynamic pipeline generation. This allows for writting code that instantiate pipelines dynamically.;Extensible: Easily define your own operators, executors and extend the library so that it fits the level of abstraction that suits your environment.;Elegant: Airflow pipelines are lean and explicit. Parameterizing your scripts is built in the core of Airflow using powerful Jinja templating engine.;Scalable: Airflow has a modular architecture and uses a message queue to talk to orchestrate an arbitrary number of workers. Airflow is ready to scale to infinity.
Multi-Cloud;Multi-lingual;Error handling; Modular; Extensible;Admin UI
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
1.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
230
Stacks
1.7K
Stacks
17
Followers
2.8K
Followers
22
Votes
128
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 53
    Features
  • 14
    Task Dependency Management
  • 12
    Cluster of workers
  • 12
    Beautiful UI
  • 10
    Extensibility
Cons
  • 2
    Observability is not great when the DAGs exceed 250
  • 2
    Open source - provides minimum or no support
  • 2
    Running it on kubernetes cluster relatively complex
  • 1
    Logical separation of DAGs is not straight forward
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Dropbox
Dropbox
Google Drive
Google Drive
Hadoop
Hadoop
WordPress
WordPress
Jira
Jira
Python
Python

What are some alternatives to Airflow, Digdag?

GitHub Actions

GitHub Actions

It makes it easy to automate all your software workflows, now with world-class CI/CD. Build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub. Make code reviews, branch management, and issue triaging work the way you want.

Apache Beam

Apache Beam

It implements batch and streaming data processing jobs that run on any execution engine. It executes pipelines on multiple execution environments.

Zenaton

Zenaton

Developer framework to orchestrate multiple services and APIs into your software application using logic triggered by events and time. Build ETL processes, A/B testing, real-time alerts and personalized user experiences with custom logic.

Luigi

Luigi

It is a Python module that helps you build complex pipelines of batch jobs. It handles dependency resolution, workflow management, visualization etc. It also comes with Hadoop support built in.

Unito

Unito

Build and map powerful workflows across tools to save your team time. No coding required. Create rules to define what information flows between each of your tools, in minutes.

Shipyard

Shipyard

na

Vison AI

Vison AI

Hire AI Employees that deliver Human-Quality work. Automate repetitive tasks, scale effortlessly, and focus on business growth without increasing head count.

Flumio

Flumio

Flumio is a modern automation platform that lets you build powerful workflows with a simple drag-and-drop interface. It combines the power of custom development with the speed of a no-code/low-code tool. Developers can still embed custom logic directly into workflows.

PromptX

PromptX

PromptX is an AI-powered enterprise knowledge and workflow platform that helps organizations search, discover and act on information with speed and accuracy. It unifies data from SharePoint, Google Drive, email, cloud systems and legacy databases into one secure Enterprise Knowledge System. Using generative and agentic AI, users can ask natural language questions and receive context-rich, verifiable answers in seconds. PromptX ingests and enriches content with semantic tagging, entity recognition and knowledge cards, turning unstructured data into actionable insights. With adaptive prompts, collaborative workspaces and AI-driven workflows, teams make faster, data-backed decisions. The platform includes RBAC, SSO, audit trails and compliance-ready AI governance, and integrates with any LLM or external search engine. It supports cloud, hybrid and on-premise deployments for healthcare, public sector, finance and enterprise service providers. PromptX converts disconnected data into trusted and actionable intelligence, bringing search, collaboration and automation into a single unified experience.

Aviator Runbooks

Aviator Runbooks

Runbooks, a spec-driven development product that lets teams author versioned, executable specs so AI agents can safely run, review, and improve code with multiplayer collaboration and audit trails.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase