StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. NoSQL Databases
  4. NOSQL Database As A Service
  5. Amazon DynamoDB vs Google Cloud Datastore

Amazon DynamoDB vs Google Cloud Datastore

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB
Stacks4.0K
Followers3.2K
Votes195
Google Cloud Datastore
Google Cloud Datastore
Stacks290
Followers357
Votes12

Amazon DynamoDB vs Google Cloud Datastore: What are the differences?

Introduction

Amazon DynamoDB and Google Cloud Datastore are both NoSQL databases that offer scalability, flexibility, and high-performance storage solutions. However, there are key differences between the two that make each service unique. In this article, we will explore these differences in detail.

  1. Data Model: One of the key differences between Amazon DynamoDB and Google Cloud Datastore is their underlying data model. DynamoDB uses a key-value store model, where each item is uniquely identified by its primary key. Datastore, on the other hand, uses an entity model, similar to a relational database, where data is structured into entities with properties and relationships.

  2. Consistency Model: DynamoDB provides eventual consistency by default, meaning that it allows for some delay in the propagation of updates across all replicas. However, it also offers strong consistency as an option. In contrast, Datastore guarantees strong consistency for all reads and writes, ensuring that all replicas are always up to date.

  3. Scalability: DynamoDB is designed to scale horizontally, allowing you to add more read and write capacity as your application needs grow. It automatically handles the distribution of data across multiple servers. Datastore, on the other hand, scales vertically, meaning that you can increase the storage capacity and performance of an individual entity as needed.

  4. Query Capabilities: DynamoDB provides a flexible query language called DynamoDB Query, which allows you to retrieve data based on conditions and filters. Datastore, on the other hand, offers a powerful query language called GQL (Google Query Language) that supports complex queries with filtering, sorting, and projection.

  5. Secondary Indexes: DynamoDB supports global secondary indexes, which allow you to create additional indexes on non-key attributes for efficient querying. Datastore, on the other hand, supports automatic indexing on all properties of an entity, making it easier to query data without the need for explicit indexing.

  6. Pricing Structure: The pricing structure of DynamoDB is based on provisioned throughput, storage, and data transfer. You pay for the read and write capacity units that you provision. Datastore, on the other hand, has a pricing structure based on the number of entities, entity reads/writes, and storage usage. You pay for the number of entities you store and the operations you perform on them.

In summary, Amazon DynamoDB and Google Cloud Datastore differ in their data models, consistency models, scalability approaches, query capabilities, secondary index support, and pricing structures. The choice between the two depends on your specific requirements and the nature of your application.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Amazon DynamoDB, Google Cloud Datastore

Doru
Doru

Solution Architect

Jun 9, 2019

ReviewonAmazon DynamoDBAmazon DynamoDB

I use Amazon DynamoDB because it integrates seamlessly with other AWS SaaS solutions and if cost is the primary concern early on, then this will be a better choice when compared to AWS RDS or any other solution that requires the creation of a HA cluster of IaaS components that will cost money just for being there, the costs not being influenced primarily by usage.

1.33k views1.33k
Comments
akash
akash

Aug 27, 2020

Needs adviceonCloud FirestoreCloud FirestoreFirebase Realtime DatabaseFirebase Realtime DatabaseAmazon DynamoDBAmazon DynamoDB

We are building a social media app, where users will post images, like their post, and make friends based on their interest. We are currently using Cloud Firestore and Firebase Realtime Database. We are looking for another database like Amazon DynamoDB; how much this decision can be efficient in terms of pricing and overhead?

199k views199k
Comments
Eduardo
Eduardo

Software Engineer at Parrot Software, Inc.

Aug 24, 2021

Decided

CouchDB has proven us to be a reliable multi-master NoSQL JSON database built natively for the web.

We decided to use it over alternatives such as Firebase due topology, costs and frontend architecture.

Thanks to CouchDB we are now a frontend first CRM platform. We are capable of delivering and leveraging our frontend code to build most of our new functionalities directly within the frontend which we enrich through backend sidecars connected to each Parrot and each CouchDB.

13.3k views13.3k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB
Google Cloud Datastore
Google Cloud Datastore

With it , you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available distributed database cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

Use a managed, NoSQL, schemaless database for storing non-relational data. Cloud Datastore automatically scales as you need it and supports transactions as well as robust, SQL-like queries.

Automated Storage Scaling – There is no limit to the amount of data you can store in a DynamoDB table, and the service automatically allocates more storage, as you store more data using the DynamoDB write APIs;Provisioned Throughput – When creating a table, simply specify how much request capacity you require. DynamoDB allocates dedicated resources to your table to meet your performance requirements, and automatically partitions data over a sufficient number of servers to meet your request capacity;Fully Distributed, Shared Nothing Architecture
Schemaless access, with SQL-like querying;Managed database;Autoscale with your users;ACID transactions;Built-in redundancy;Local development tools
Statistics
Stacks
4.0K
Stacks
290
Followers
3.2K
Followers
357
Votes
195
Votes
12
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 62
    Predictable performance and cost
  • 56
    Scalable
  • 35
    Native JSON Support
  • 21
    AWS Free Tier
  • 7
    Fast
Cons
  • 4
    Only sequential access for paginate data
  • 1
    Document Limit Size
  • 1
    Scaling
Pros
  • 7
    High scalability
  • 2
    Ability to query any property
  • 2
    Serverless
  • 1
    Pay for what you use
Integrations
Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL
Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
MySQL
MySQL
SQLite
SQLite
Azure Database for MySQL
Azure Database for MySQL
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Amazon DynamoDB, Google Cloud Datastore?

Azure Cosmos DB

Azure Cosmos DB

Azure DocumentDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service built for fast and predictable performance, high availability, elastic scaling, global distribution, and ease of development.

Cloud Firestore

Cloud Firestore

Cloud Firestore is a NoSQL document database that lets you easily store, sync, and query data for your mobile and web apps - at global scale.

Cloudant

Cloudant

Cloudant’s distributed database as a service (DBaaS) allows developers of fast-growing web and mobile apps to focus on building and improving their products, instead of worrying about scaling and managing databases on their own.

Google Cloud Bigtable

Google Cloud Bigtable

Google Cloud Bigtable offers you a fast, fully managed, massively scalable NoSQL database service that's ideal for web, mobile, and Internet of Things applications requiring terabytes to petabytes of data. Unlike comparable market offerings, Cloud Bigtable doesn't require you to sacrifice speed, scale, or cost efficiency when your applications grow. Cloud Bigtable has been battle-tested at Google for more than 10 years—it's the database driving major applications such as Google Analytics and Gmail.

CloudBoost

CloudBoost

CloudBoost.io is a database service for the “next web” - that not only does data-storage, but also search, real-time and a whole lot more which enables developers to build much richer apps with 50% less time saving them a ton of cost and helping them go to market much faster.

Firebase Realtime Database

Firebase Realtime Database

It is a cloud-hosted NoSQL database that lets you store and sync data between your users in realtime. Data is synced across all clients in realtime, and remains available when your app goes offline.

restdb.io

restdb.io

RestDB is a NoSql document oriented database cloud service. Data is accessed as JSON objects via HTTPS. This gives great flexibility, easy system integration and future compatibility.

Amazon DocumentDB

Amazon DocumentDB

Amazon DocumentDB is a non-relational database service designed from the ground-up to give you the performance, scalability, and availability you need when operating mission-critical MongoDB workloads at scale. In Amazon DocumentDB, the storage and compute are decoupled, allowing each to scale independently, and you can increase the read capacity to millions of requests per second by adding up to 15 low latency read replicas in minutes, regardless of the size of your data.

Amazon SimpleDB

Amazon SimpleDB

Developers simply store and query data items via web services requests and Amazon SimpleDB does the rest. Behind the scenes, Amazon SimpleDB creates and manages multiple geographically distributed replicas of your data automatically to enable high availability and data durability. Amazon SimpleDB provides a simple web services interface to create and store multiple data sets, query your data easily, and return the results. Your data is automatically indexed, making it easy to quickly find the information that you need. There is no need to pre-define a schema or change a schema if new data is added later. And scale-out is as simple as creating new domains, rather than building out new servers.

Datomic Cloud

Datomic Cloud

A transactional database with a flexible data model, elastic scaling, and rich queries. Datomic is designed from the ground up to run on AWS. Datomic leverages AWS technology, including DynamoDB, S3, EFS, and CloudFormation to provide a fully integrated solution.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase