StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Animate.css vs Bootstrap

Animate.css vs Bootstrap

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Stacks57.4K
Followers13.2K
Votes7.7K
GitHub Stars173.6K
Forks79.2K
Animate.css
Animate.css
Stacks11.4K
Followers3.1K
Votes0

Animate.css vs Bootstrap: What are the differences?

Animate.css and Bootstrap are popular front-end frameworks used to enhance the design and functionality of websites. While both frameworks offer a variety of features and animations, there are several key differences between the two.
  1. Customization: Animate.css primarily focuses on providing pre-designed CSS animations that can be easily integrated into a website. It offers a wide range of animation effects with adjustable durations and delays. On the other hand, Bootstrap offers a comprehensive set of UI components, including predefined animations, which can be customized based on the project’s unique requirements.

  2. Scope: Animate.css is solely dedicated to animations, focusing on providing an extensive library of CSS animations that can be applied to individual elements or entire sections of a webpage. Conversely, Bootstrap is a more versatile framework that encompasses a range of components, such as grids, navigation bars, and forms, in addition to animations.

  3. Dependencies: Animate.css doesn’t have any external dependencies, making it lightweight and easy to implement in any web project. In contrast, Bootstrap requires jQuery as a dependency to ensure the smooth functioning of its components and animations.

  4. Ease of Use: Animate.css is incredibly easy to use, allowing developers to simply add CSS classes to HTML elements to apply animations. With its intuitive syntax, even those with basic HTML and CSS knowledge can quickly implement animations. Bootstrap, although relatively user-friendly, requires a bit more familiarity with its classes and structure to fully utilize its features.

  5. Responsiveness: Bootstrap is built with responsiveness in mind, offering a responsive grid system and components that automatically adjust to different screen sizes. Animate.css, on the other hand, focuses on animations and does not include responsive features by default.

  6. Community Support: Bootstrap, being one of the most widely used front-end frameworks, boasts a large and active community. This extensive community support ensures regular updates, bug fixes, and a plethora of online resources. While Animate.css has decent community support, it might lack the same level of resources and updates compared to Bootstrap.

In Summary, Animate.css is a lightweight and user-friendly framework designed primarily for animations, while Bootstrap is a versatile framework that offers a wide range of components, including animations, with more customization options and responsive features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bootstrap, Animate.css

Bridget
Bridget

Full Stack Developer at Bridget Sarah

May 29, 2020

Decided

I do prefer to write things from scratch however when it came to wanting to jump-start the frontend, I found that it was taking me a lot longer hence why needing to use something very fast.

Bootstrap was the boom when it came out, I didn't like it, to be honest, set in its way and a pain to over-ride and in addition, you can tell from a distance if you're using boostrap and as everything looks the same.

I came across Tailwind CSS as I wanted more dynamic features, you could say, I've been now doing it for a few days and I love it a lot. I've been practising with the full stack part installed but I an't we wait until I do a new project, and I'll e able to select exactly what I want. Much faster.

681k views681k
Comments
Daniel
Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceonNew RelicNew RelicNext.jsNext.jsReactReact

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M
Comments
Syed
Syed

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceonBootstrapBootstrapTailwind CSSTailwind CSS

I am planning to redesign my entire application, which is currently in Bootstrap. I heard about Tailwind CSS, and I think its really cool to work with. Is it okay if I use Bootstrap and Tailwind together? I can't remove Bootstrap altogether, as my application is using the js dependencies of Bootstrap, which I don't want to disturb.

739k views739k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Animate.css
Animate.css

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

It is a bunch of cool, fun, and cross-browser animations for you to use in your projects. Great for emphasis, home pages, sliders, and general just-add-water-awesomeness.

Preprocessors: Bootstrap ships with vanilla CSS, but its source code utilizes the two most popular CSS preprocessors, Less and Sass. Quickly get started with precompiled CSS or build on the source.;One framework, every device: Bootstrap easily and efficiently scales your websites and applications with a single code base, from phones to tablets to desktops with CSS media queries.;Full of features: With Bootstrap, you get extensive and beautiful documentation for common HTML elements, dozens of custom HTML and CSS components, and awesome jQuery plugins.
Cross-browser animations; Usage with Javascript; Setting Delay and Speed
Statistics
GitHub Stars
173.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
79.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
57.4K
Stacks
11.4K
Followers
13.2K
Followers
3.1K
Votes
7.7K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1582
    Responsiveness
  • 1193
    UI components
  • 943
    Consistent
  • 779
    Great docs
  • 677
    Flexible
Cons
  • 26
    Javascript is tied to jquery
  • 16
    Every site uses the defaults
  • 15
    Grid system break points aren't ideal
  • 14
    Too much heavy decoration in default look
  • 8
    Verbose styles
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
CSS 3
CSS 3
HTML5
HTML5

What are some alternatives to Bootstrap, Animate.css ?

Sass

Sass

Sass is an extension of CSS3, adding nested rules, variables, mixins, selector inheritance, and more. It's translated to well-formatted, standard CSS using the command line tool or a web-framework plugin.

Less

Less

Less is a CSS pre-processor, meaning that it extends the CSS language, adding features that allow variables, mixins, functions and many other techniques that allow you to make CSS that is more maintainable, themable and extendable.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase