StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Big Data Tools
  5. Apache Hive vs Azure Synapse

Apache Hive vs Azure Synapse

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Hive
Apache Hive
Stacks487
Followers475
Votes0
GitHub Stars5.9K
Forks4.8K
Azure Synapse
Azure Synapse
Stacks104
Followers230
Votes10

Apache Hive vs Azure Synapse: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Apache Hive and Azure Synapse

Apache Hive and Azure Synapse are both popular tools used for big data processing and analysis. While they have some similarities, there are key differences that set them apart. Here are the main differences between Apache Hive and Azure Synapse:

  1. Architecture and Processing Engine: Apache Hive is based on Hadoop and uses the MapReduce processing engine for data processing. On the other hand, Azure Synapse is a cloud-based offering that uses its own parallel processing engine. This difference in architecture and processing engine can impact performance and scalability.

  2. Integration with Ecosystem: Apache Hive integrates well with the Hadoop ecosystem and supports various data formats and storage systems such as HDFS, Amazon S3, etc. Azure Synapse, being a Microsoft product, offers seamless integration with other Azure services like Azure Data Lake Storage, Azure SQL Data Warehouse, etc. This integration can simplify data management and enable a more unified data platform.

  3. Multi-Cloud and Hybrid Deployment: Apache Hive is primarily used in on-premises or on a single cloud environment. In contrast, Azure Synapse provides multi-cloud and hybrid deployment options, allowing organizations to leverage multiple cloud providers or combine on-premises and cloud capabilities. This flexibility can be beneficial for organizations with complex infrastructure needs.

  4. SQL Compatibility: Apache Hive uses a SQL-like query language called HiveQL for querying and analyzing data. While it supports SQL dialects such as ANSI SQL, it may not provide full SQL compatibility. Azure Synapse, on the other hand, supports a wide range of SQL features and has better SQL compatibility overall. This difference can impact the ease of use and compatibility with existing SQL-based workflows.

  5. Advanced Analytics Capabilities: Azure Synapse offers advanced analytics capabilities through integration with Azure Machine Learning and Power BI. This allows users to perform Machine Learning tasks and create interactive visualizations directly within the Synapse environment. Apache Hive, on the other hand, focuses primarily on data processing and may not provide as extensive analytics features.

  6. Security and Governance: Azure Synapse provides robust security and governance features, including data masking, row-level security, auditing, etc., to ensure data protection and compliance. While Apache Hive also offers some security features, the level of security and governance capabilities may not be as comprehensive as Azure Synapse. This difference is important for organizations that prioritize data security and compliance.

In summary, the key differences between Apache Hive and Azure Synapse lie in their architecture, integration capabilities, deployment options, SQL compatibility, advanced analytics features, and security/governance capabilities. Understanding these differences can help organizations choose the right tool for their big data processing and analysis needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Apache Hive, Azure Synapse

Ashish
Ashish

Tech Lead, Big Data Platform at Pinterest

Nov 27, 2019

Needs adviceonApache HiveApache HivePrestoPrestoAmazon EC2Amazon EC2

To provide employees with the critical need of interactive querying, we’ve worked with Presto, an open-source distributed SQL query engine, over the years. Operating Presto at Pinterest’s scale has involved resolving quite a few challenges like, supporting deeply nested and huge thrift schemas, slow/ bad worker detection and remediation, auto-scaling cluster, graceful cluster shutdown and impersonation support for ldap authenticator.

Our infrastructure is built on top of Amazon EC2 and we leverage Amazon S3 for storing our data. This separates compute and storage layers, and allows multiple compute clusters to share the S3 data.

We have hundreds of petabytes of data and tens of thousands of Apache Hive tables. Our Presto clusters are comprised of a fleet of 450 r4.8xl EC2 instances. Presto clusters together have over 100 TBs of memory and 14K vcpu cores. Within Pinterest, we have close to more than 1,000 monthly active users (out of total 1,600+ Pinterest employees) using Presto, who run about 400K queries on these clusters per month.

Each query submitted to Presto cluster is logged to a Kafka topic via Singer. Singer is a logging agent built at Pinterest and we talked about it in a previous post. Each query is logged when it is submitted and when it finishes. When a Presto cluster crashes, we will have query submitted events without corresponding query finished events. These events enable us to capture the effect of cluster crashes over time.

Each Presto cluster at Pinterest has workers on a mix of dedicated AWS EC2 instances and Kubernetes pods. Kubernetes platform provides us with the capability to add and remove workers from a Presto cluster very quickly. The best-case latency on bringing up a new worker on Kubernetes is less than a minute. However, when the Kubernetes cluster itself is out of resources and needs to scale up, it can take up to ten minutes. Some other advantages of deploying on Kubernetes platform is that our Presto deployment becomes agnostic of cloud vendor, instance types, OS, etc.

#BigData #AWS #DataScience #DataEngineering

3.72M views3.72M
Comments
Karthik
Karthik

CPO at Cantiz

Nov 5, 2019

Decided

The platform deals with time series data from sensors aggregated against things( event data that originates at periodic intervals). We use Cassandra as our distributed database to store time series data. Aggregated data insights from Cassandra is delivered as web API for consumption from other applications. Presto as a distributed sql querying engine, can provide a faster execution time provided the queries are tuned for proper distribution across the cluster. Another objective that we had was to combine Cassandra table data with other business data from RDBMS or other big data systems where presto through its connector architecture would have opened up a whole lot of options for us.

225k views225k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache Hive
Apache Hive
Azure Synapse
Azure Synapse

Hive facilitates reading, writing, and managing large datasets residing in distributed storage using SQL. Structure can be projected onto data already in storage.

It is an analytics service that brings together enterprise data warehousing and Big Data analytics. It gives you the freedom to query data on your terms, using either serverless on-demand or provisioned resources—at scale. It brings these two worlds together with a unified experience to ingest, prepare, manage, and serve data for immediate BI and machine learning needs.

Built on top of Apache Hadoop; Tools to enable easy access to data via SQL; Support for extract/transform/load (ETL), reporting, and data analysis; Access to files stored either directly in Apache HDFS and HBase; Query execution using Apache Hadoop MapReduce, Tez or Spark frameworks
Complete T-SQL based analytics – Generally Available; Deeply integrated Apache Spark; Hybrid data integration; Unified user experience
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
487
Stacks
104
Followers
475
Followers
230
Votes
0
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 4
    ETL
  • 3
    Security
  • 2
    Serverless
  • 1
    Doesn't support cross database query
Cons
  • 1
    Concurrency
  • 1
    Dictionary Size Limitation - CCI
Integrations
Hadoop
Hadoop
Apache Spark
Apache Spark
HBase
HBase
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Apache Hive, Azure Synapse?

Metabase

Metabase

It is an easy way to generate charts and dashboards, ask simple ad hoc queries without using SQL, and see detailed information about rows in your Database. You can set it up in under 5 minutes, and then give yourself and others a place to ask simple questions and understand the data your application is generating.

Google BigQuery

Google BigQuery

Run super-fast, SQL-like queries against terabytes of data in seconds, using the processing power of Google's infrastructure. Load data with ease. Bulk load your data using Google Cloud Storage or stream it in. Easy access. Access BigQuery by using a browser tool, a command-line tool, or by making calls to the BigQuery REST API with client libraries such as Java, PHP or Python.

Apache Spark

Apache Spark

Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.

Amazon Redshift

Amazon Redshift

It is optimized for data sets ranging from a few hundred gigabytes to a petabyte or more and costs less than $1,000 per terabyte per year, a tenth the cost of most traditional data warehousing solutions.

Qubole

Qubole

Qubole is a cloud based service that makes big data easy for analysts and data engineers.

Presto

Presto

Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data

Amazon EMR

Amazon EMR

It is used in a variety of applications, including log analysis, data warehousing, machine learning, financial analysis, scientific simulation, and bioinformatics.

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Athena is serverless, so there is no infrastructure to manage, and you pay only for the queries that you run.

Superset

Superset

Superset's main goal is to make it easy to slice, dice and visualize data. It empowers users to perform analytics at the speed of thought.

Apache Flink

Apache Flink

Apache Flink is an open source system for fast and versatile data analytics in clusters. Flink supports batch and streaming analytics, in one system. Analytical programs can be written in concise and elegant APIs in Java and Scala.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase