Alternatives to Appsee logo

Alternatives to Appsee

Firebase, UXCam, Mixpanel, Google Analytics, and Crashlytics are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Appsee.
13
37
+ 1
2

What is Appsee and what are its top alternatives?

Appsee is the leader in qualitative mobile app analytics, utilizing user session recordings and touch heatmaps to uncover UI & UX issues, and achieve ambitious app KPIs.
Appsee is a tool in the Heatmap Analytics category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to Appsee

  • Firebase
    Firebase

    Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds. ...

  • UXCam
    UXCam

    UXCam automatically records all events in your app, providing insights into user behavior and helping you solve problems that users encounter. ...

  • Mixpanel
    Mixpanel

    Mixpanel helps companies build better products through data. With our powerful, self-serve product analytics solution, teams can easily analyze how and why people engage, convert, and retain to improve their user experience. ...

  • Google Analytics
    Google Analytics

    Google Analytics lets you measure your advertising ROI as well as track your Flash, video, and social networking sites and applications. ...

  • Crashlytics
    Crashlytics

    Instead of just showing you the stack trace, Crashlytics performs deep analysis of each and every thread. We de-prioritize lines that don't matter while highlighting the interesting ones. This makes reading stack traces easier, faster, and far more useful! Crashlytics' intelligent grouping can take 50,000 crashes, distill them down to 20 unique issues, and then tell you which 3 are the most important to fix. ...

  • Amplitude
    Amplitude

    Amplitude provides scalable mobile analytics that helps companies leverage data to create explosive user growth. Anyone in the company can use Amplitude to pinpoint the most valuable behavioral patterns within hours. ...

  • Lookback
    Lookback

    Lookback helps you collect, understand and share user experiences.

  • Smartlook
    Smartlook

    Smartlook is a qualitative analytics solution for iOS and Android apps. Understand how users interact with your app — watch recordings, track events, and build conversion funnels. ...

Appsee alternatives & related posts

Firebase logo

Firebase

41.3K
2K
The Realtime App Platform
41.3K
2K
PROS OF FIREBASE
  • 371
    Realtime backend made easy
  • 270
    Fast and responsive
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 215
    Real-time
  • 191
    JSON
  • 134
    Free
  • 128
    Backed by google
  • 83
    Angular adaptor
  • 68
    Reliable
  • 36
    Great customer support
  • 32
    Great documentation
  • 25
    Real-time synchronization
  • 21
    Mobile friendly
  • 19
    Rapid prototyping
  • 14
    Great security
  • 12
    Automatic scaling
  • 11
    Freakingly awesome
  • 8
    Super fast development
  • 8
    Angularfire is an amazing addition!
  • 8
    Chat
  • 6
    Firebase hosting
  • 6
    Built in user auth/oauth
  • 6
    Awesome next-gen backend
  • 6
    Ios adaptor
  • 4
    Speed of light
  • 4
    Very easy to use
  • 3
    Great
  • 3
    It's made development super fast
  • 3
    Brilliant for startups
  • 2
    Free hosting
  • 2
    Cloud functions
  • 2
    JS Offline and Sync suport
  • 2
    Low battery consumption
  • 2
    .net
  • 2
    The concurrent updates create a great experience
  • 2
    Push notification
  • 2
    I can quickly create static web apps with no backend
  • 2
    Great all-round functionality
  • 2
    Free authentication solution
  • 1
    Easy Reactjs integration
  • 1
    Google's support
  • 1
    Free SSL
  • 1
    CDN & cache out of the box
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Large
  • 1
    Faster workflow
  • 1
    Serverless
  • 1
    Good Free Limits
  • 1
    Simple and easy
CONS OF FIREBASE
  • 31
    Can become expensive
  • 16
    No open source, you depend on external company
  • 15
    Scalability is not infinite
  • 9
    Not Flexible Enough
  • 7
    Cant filter queries
  • 3
    Very unstable server
  • 3
    No Relational Data
  • 2
    Too many errors
  • 2
    No offline sync

related Firebase posts

Stephen Gheysens
Lead Solutions Engineer at Inscribe · | 14 upvotes · 1.8M views

Hi Otensia! I'd definitely recommend using the skills you've already got and building with JavaScript is a smart way to go these days. Most platform services have JavaScript/Node SDKs or NPM packages, many serverless platforms support Node in case you need to write any backend logic, and JavaScript is incredibly popular - meaning it will be easy to hire for, should you ever need to.

My advice would be "don't reinvent the wheel". If you already have a skill set that will work well to solve the problem at hand, and you don't need it for any other projects, don't spend the time jumping into a new language. If you're looking for an excuse to learn something new, it would be better to invest that time in learning a new platform/tool that compliments your knowledge of JavaScript. For this project, I might recommend using Netlify, Vercel, or Google Firebase to quickly and easily deploy your web app. If you need to add user authentication, there are great examples out there for Firebase Authentication, Auth0, or even Magic (a newcomer on the Auth scene, but very user friendly). All of these services work very well with a JavaScript-based application.

See more
Eugene Cheah

For inboxkitten.com, an opensource disposable email service;

We migrated our serverless workload from Cloud Functions for Firebase to CloudFlare workers, taking advantage of the lower cost and faster-performing edge computing of Cloudflare network. Made possible due to our extremely low CPU and RAM overhead of our serverless functions.

If I were to summarize the limitation of Cloudflare (as oppose to firebase/gcp functions), it would be ...

  1. <5ms CPU time limit
  2. Incompatible with express.js
  3. one script limitation per domain

Limitations our workload is able to conform with (YMMV)

For hosting of static files, we migrated from Firebase to CommonsHost

More details on the trade-off in between both serverless providers is in the article

See more
UXCam logo

UXCam

23
2
Watch playback videos of your users using your app + UX analytics to find and fix UX issues
23
2
PROS OF UXCAM
  • 1
    Security GDPR design
  • 1
    Magnificent customer support
CONS OF UXCAM
    Be the first to leave a con

    related UXCam posts

    Mixpanel logo

    Mixpanel

    7.1K
    438
    Powerful, self-serve product analytics to help you convert, engage, and retain more users
    7.1K
    438
    PROS OF MIXPANEL
    • 144
      Great visualization ui
    • 108
      Easy integration
    • 78
      Great funnel funcionality
    • 58
      Free
    • 22
      A wide range of tools
    • 15
      Powerful Graph Search
    • 11
      Responsive Customer Support
    • 2
      Nice reporting
    CONS OF MIXPANEL
    • 2
      Messaging (notification, email) features are weak
    • 2
      Paid plans can get expensive
    • 1
      Limited dashboard capabilities

    related Mixpanel posts

    Max Musing
    Founder & CEO at BaseDash · | 9 upvotes · 384K views

    Functionally, Amplitude and Mixpanel are incredibly similar. They both offer almost all the same functionality around tracking and visualizing user actions for analytics. You can track A/B test results in both. We ended up going with Amplitude at BaseDash because it has a more generous free tier for our uses (10 million actions per month, versus Mixpanel's 1000 monthly tracked users).

    Segment isn't meant to compete with these tools, but instead acts as an API to send actions to them, and other analytics tools. If you're just sending event data to one of these tools, you probably don't need Segment. If you're using other analytics tools like Google Analytics and FullStory, Segment makes it easy to send events to all your tools at once.

    See more
    Yasmine de Aranda
    Chief Growth Officer at Huddol · | 7 upvotes · 397.8K views

    Hi there, we are a seed-stage startup in the personal development space. I am looking at building the marketing stack tool to have an accurate view of the user experience from acquisition through to adoption and retention for our upcoming React Native Mobile app. We qualify for the startup program of Segment and Mixpanel, which seems like a good option to get rolling and scale for free to learn how our current 60K free members will interact in the new subscription-based platform. I was considering AppsFlyer for attribution, and I am now looking at an affordable yet scalable Mobile Marketing tool vs. building in-house. Braze looks great, so does Leanplum, but the price points are 30K to start, which we can't do. I looked at OneSignal, but it doesn't have user flow visualization. I am now looking into Urban Airship and Iterable. Any advice would be much appreciated!

    See more
    Google Analytics logo

    Google Analytics

    127.8K
    5.1K
    Enterprise-class web analytics.
    127.8K
    5.1K
    PROS OF GOOGLE ANALYTICS
    • 1.5K
      Free
    • 927
      Easy setup
    • 891
      Data visualization
    • 698
      Real-time stats
    • 406
      Comprehensive feature set
    • 182
      Goals tracking
    • 155
      Powerful funnel conversion reporting
    • 139
      Customizable reports
    • 83
      Custom events try
    • 53
      Elastic api
    • 15
      Updated regulary
    • 8
      Interactive Documentation
    • 4
      Google play
    • 3
      Walkman music video playlist
    • 3
      Industry Standard
    • 3
      Advanced ecommerce
    • 2
      Irina
    • 2
      Easy to integrate
    • 2
      Financial Management Challenges -2015h
    • 2
      Medium / Channel data split
    • 2
      Lifesaver
    CONS OF GOOGLE ANALYTICS
    • 11
      Confusing UX/UI
    • 8
      Super complex
    • 6
      Very hard to build out funnels
    • 4
      Poor web performance metrics
    • 3
      Very easy to confuse the user of the analytics
    • 2
      Time spent on page isn't accurate out of the box

    related Google Analytics posts

    Tassanai Singprom

    This is my stack in Application & Data

    JavaScript PHP HTML5 jQuery Redis Amazon EC2 Ubuntu Sass Vue.js Firebase Laravel Lumen Amazon RDS GraphQL MariaDB

    My Utilities Tools

    Google Analytics Postman Elasticsearch

    My Devops Tools

    Git GitHub GitLab npm Visual Studio Code Kibana Sentry BrowserStack

    My Business Tools

    Slack

    See more
    Max Musing
    Founder & CEO at BaseDash · | 9 upvotes · 384K views

    Functionally, Amplitude and Mixpanel are incredibly similar. They both offer almost all the same functionality around tracking and visualizing user actions for analytics. You can track A/B test results in both. We ended up going with Amplitude at BaseDash because it has a more generous free tier for our uses (10 million actions per month, versus Mixpanel's 1000 monthly tracked users).

    Segment isn't meant to compete with these tools, but instead acts as an API to send actions to them, and other analytics tools. If you're just sending event data to one of these tools, you probably don't need Segment. If you're using other analytics tools like Google Analytics and FullStory, Segment makes it easy to send events to all your tools at once.

    See more
    Crashlytics logo

    Crashlytics

    1K
    340
    The world's most powerful, yet lightest weight crash reporting solution. Free for everybody.
    1K
    340
    PROS OF CRASHLYTICS
    • 78
      Crash tracking
    • 56
      Mobile exception tracking
    • 53
      Free
    • 37
      Easy deployment
    • 25
      Ios
    • 15
      Great ui
    • 11
      Great reports
    • 10
      Android
    • 8
      Advanced Logging
    • 7
      Monitor Tester Lifecycle
    • 3
      Mac APP and IDE Plugins
    • 3
      Great User Experience
    • 3
      In Real-Time
    • 3
      iOS SDK
    • 3
      Security
    • 3
      Android SDK
    • 2
      The UI is simple and it just works
    • 2
      Best UI
    • 2
      Light
    • 2
      Real-time
    • 2
      Seamless
    • 2
      Painless App Distribution
    • 2
      Crash Reporting
    • 2
      Beta distribution
    • 2
      Mobile Analytics
    • 2
      Deep Workflow Integration
    • 1
      IOS QA Deploy and tracking
    • 1
      Easy iOS Integration
    CONS OF CRASHLYTICS
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Crashlytics posts

      Алексей Нестерчук
      Shared insights
      on
      AWS ConfigAWS ConfigCrashlyticsCrashlytics

      From firebase Crashlytics, everything is simple, we install SDK and configs, and then we can see all the crashes. With AWS, it is not clear to me which service to use for the same purpose as configuring it. Correctly I understand that for automatic sending of all crashes, you need to use AWS Config?

      See more
      Amplitude logo

      Amplitude

      891
      36
      User analytics to fuel explosive user growth
      891
      36
      PROS OF AMPLITUDE
      • 11
        Great for product managers
      • 8
        Easy setup
      • 6
        Efficient analysis
      • 2
        Behavioral cohorts
      • 2
        Event streams for individual users
      • 2
        Chart edits get their own URLs
      • 2
        Free for up to 10M user actions per month
      • 1
        Fast
      • 1
        Great UI
      • 1
        Engagement Matrix is super helpful
      CONS OF AMPLITUDE
      • 4
        Super expensive once you're past the free plan

      related Amplitude posts

      Robert Zuber

      Our primary source of monitoring and alerting is Datadog. We’ve got prebuilt dashboards for every scenario and integration with PagerDuty to manage routing any alerts. We’ve definitely scaled past the point where managing dashboards is easy, but we haven’t had time to invest in using features like Anomaly Detection. We’ve started using Honeycomb for some targeted debugging of complex production issues and we are liking what we’ve seen. We capture any unhandled exceptions with Rollbar and, if we realize one will keep happening, we quickly convert the metrics to point back to Datadog, to keep Rollbar as clean as possible.

      We use Segment to consolidate all of our trackers, the most important of which goes to Amplitude to analyze user patterns. However, if we need a more consolidated view, we push all of our data to our own data warehouse running PostgreSQL; this is available for analytics and dashboard creation through Looker.

      See more
      Max Musing
      Founder & CEO at BaseDash · | 9 upvotes · 384K views

      Functionally, Amplitude and Mixpanel are incredibly similar. They both offer almost all the same functionality around tracking and visualizing user actions for analytics. You can track A/B test results in both. We ended up going with Amplitude at BaseDash because it has a more generous free tier for our uses (10 million actions per month, versus Mixpanel's 1000 monthly tracked users).

      Segment isn't meant to compete with these tools, but instead acts as an API to send actions to them, and other analytics tools. If you're just sending event data to one of these tools, you probably don't need Segment. If you're using other analytics tools like Google Analytics and FullStory, Segment makes it easy to send events to all your tools at once.

      See more
      Lookback logo

      Lookback

      28
      0
      Collect, understand and share user experiences.
      28
      0
      PROS OF LOOKBACK
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF LOOKBACK
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Lookback posts

          Smartlook logo

          Smartlook

          152
          43
          Smartlook records users on websites and in mobile apps. Find useful information in thousands of recordings in no...
          152
          43
          PROS OF SMARTLOOK
          • 9
            Good price plans
          • 9
            Works in web and mobile
          • 8
            Easy to use dashboard
          • 6
            Helps me to improve navigation and content layout
          • 5
            Easy to use for a newbie
          • 3
            Good data retention for historical analysis
          • 2
            The data shown is perfect
          • 1
            Works great for digital marketing research
          CONS OF SMARTLOOK
            Be the first to leave a con

            related Smartlook posts