StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Security
  4. Security
  5. ArcSight vs CyberArk

ArcSight vs CyberArk

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CyberArk
CyberArk
Stacks44
Followers72
Votes0
ArcSight
ArcSight
Stacks5
Followers7
Votes0

ArcSight vs CyberArk: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will compare the key differences between ArcSight and CyberArk. Both ArcSight and CyberArk are widely used in the field of cybersecurity, but they differ in several aspects that make them suitable for different purposes. Below, we present the key differences between these two platforms.

  1. Data Analysis Capabilities: ArcSight is primarily focused on log management and security information and event management (SIEM). It offers advanced data analysis capabilities, including real-time correlation of events, which allows organizations to detect and respond to security threats effectively. On the other hand, CyberArk is a privileged access management (PAM) solution that primarily focuses on securing and managing privileged accounts. While it provides some level of log analysis, it does not offer the same extensive data analysis capabilities as ArcSight.

  2. Scope of Functionality: ArcSight covers a broad range of security functionalities, including log management, SIEM, and security operation center (SOC) capabilities. It allows organizations to collect and analyze logs from various sources, detect anomalies, generate alerts, and streamline incident response. On the contrary, CyberArk's main focus is on securing privileged accounts and credentials, managing access controls, and safeguarding sensitive information. It provides solutions for credential management, session isolation, threat analytics, and password vaulting.

  3. Deployment and Scalability: ArcSight is typically deployed as an on-premise solution and requires server infrastructure to manage large volumes of logs and events. It can handle high-scale environments and is suitable for organizations with a significant security infrastructure. On the other hand, CyberArk offers both on-premise and cloud-based deployment options. It is highly scalable and can adapt to organizations of different sizes, ranging from small businesses to large enterprises.

  4. Integration Capabilities: ArcSight provides extensive integration capabilities, allowing organizations to integrate with various third-party security tools and systems. It offers out-of-the-box integrations with numerous security devices, applications, and frameworks, enabling a comprehensive security ecosystem. In contrast, CyberArk offers integration with select security solutions, primarily focusing on privileged access integration, such as integrating with SIEM tools for enhanced threat detection and response.

  5. Core Focus: The core focus of ArcSight is on building a centralized security intelligence platform that provides real-time monitoring, analysis, and response to security events. It aims to help organizations gain visibility into their environment, detect security incidents, and respond promptly to mitigate risks. On the other hand, CyberArk's primary focus is on securing privileged accounts and credentials, preventing unauthorized access or abuse of such accounts, and ensuring compliance with regulatory guidelines.

  6. Compliance and Audit Support: ArcSight offers robust compliance and audit support features. It provides predefined rules, policies, and reports that help organizations meet regulatory requirements, demonstrate compliance, and streamline audit processes. Additionally, ArcSight offers features like real-time monitoring, alerting, and reporting that contribute to compliance maintenance. In comparison, while CyberArk provides some level of compliance features, its primary focus is on securing privileged access rather than comprehensive compliance management.

In summary, ArcSight and CyberArk differ in terms of their core functionalities, scope, deployment options, integration capabilities, and focus areas. ArcSight is a comprehensive security intelligence platform with strong data analysis capabilities, while CyberArk specializes in privileged access management. The choice between these two platforms depends on the specific cybersecurity needs and priorities of an organization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

CyberArk
CyberArk
ArcSight
ArcSight

It is the only security software company focused on eliminating cyber threats using insider privileges to attack the heart of the enterprise.

Real-time threat detection, machine-learning analytics, and SOAR integrations to minimize exposure to threats.

Email attachment protection; Credential protection and management; Session isolation and monitoring; Threat detection and analytics; End-to-end server protection; Domain controller protection; Activity monitoring; In-progress Kerberos attack detection
Real-time threat detection; Machine-learning analytics
Statistics
Stacks
44
Stacks
5
Followers
72
Followers
7
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Sentry
Sentry
Rafay Systems
Rafay Systems
Mingle
Mingle
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to CyberArk, ArcSight?

Let's Encrypt

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

ExpeditedSSL

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Clef

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

Wazuh

Wazuh

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

Detectify

Detectify

Detectify is a web security service that simulates automated hacker attacks on your website, detecting critical security issues before real hackers do. We provide you with descriptive reports of the results so that you can continue to build safe products

SSLMate

SSLMate

SSLMate is the easiest way for developers and sysadmins to buy SSL certificates.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope