StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Operating Systems
  5. Argo vs RancherOS

Argo vs RancherOS

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

RancherOS
RancherOS
Stacks104
Followers158
Votes3
GitHub Stars6.4K
Forks654
Argo
Argo
Stacks761
Followers470
Votes6

Argo vs RancherOS: What are the differences?

Argo and RancherOS are two container orchestration platforms. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Container Runtime: Argo uses Kubernetes as its underlying container runtime, which provides a highly scalable and flexible environment for managing containers. On the other hand, RancherOS uses Docker as its container runtime, which is widely adopted and offers a comprehensive ecosystem of tools and services for container management.

  2. Operating System: Argo relies on the host operating system for its underlying infrastructure and networking stack, allowing users to choose different operating systems based on their requirements. In contrast, RancherOS is an operating system designed specifically for running containers, providing a minimalistic and lightweight environment that is optimized for containerized workloads.

  3. Management Interface: Argo offers a web-based management interface, providing a user-friendly dashboard for managing and monitoring containers, as well as associated resources. RancherOS, on the other hand, provides a command-line interface (CLI) as its primary management tool, allowing users to interact with the platform through command-line commands and scripts.

  4. Container Persistence: Argo supports persistent storage for containers through the use of Kubernetes' persistent volume framework, allowing data to be stored even if a container is restarted or rescheduled. RancherOS, however, does not have native support for persistent storage, although external solutions can be integrated to provide this functionality if required.

  5. Container Networking: Argo leverages the networking capabilities provided by Kubernetes, allowing containers to communicate with each other and external resources through various network plugins and configurations. RancherOS provides its own networking solution called CNI (Container Network Interface), which offers flexible networking options for containerized environments.

  6. Application Packaging: Argo uses Docker images for packaging and distributing applications, allowing users to easily deploy containers with pre-configured environments. RancherOS, on the other hand, supports the use of Docker images as well as system containers, which are lightweight containers that include only essential system-level components and services.

In summary, Argo is a container-native workflow engine designed for Kubernetes applications, facilitating automation and management of complex workflows. RancherOS, on the other hand, is a lightweight Linux distribution optimized for Docker containers, offering a minimalistic operating system environment.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

RancherOS
RancherOS
Argo
Argo

It makes it simple to run containers at scale in development, test and production. By containerizing system services and leveraging Docker for management, the operating system provides a very reliable and easy to manage containers.

Argo is an open source container-native workflow engine for getting work done on Kubernetes. Argo is implemented as a Kubernetes CRD (Custom Resource Definition).

Lightweight; Rancher Integration; Kuberenetes Integration;Minimalist OS;Comprehensive System Services;Improved Security
DAG or Steps based declaration of workflows;Artifact support (S3, Artifactory, HTTP, Git, raw);Step level input & outputs (artifacts/parameters);Loops;Parameterization;Conditionals;Timeouts (step & workflow level);Retry (step & workflow level);Resubmit (memoized);Suspend & Resume;Cancellation;K8s resource orchestration;Exit Hooks (notifications, cleanup);Garbage collection of completed workflow;Scheduling (affinity/tolerations/node selectors);Volumes (ephemeral/existing);Parallelism limits;Daemoned steps;DinD (docker-in-docker);Script steps
Statistics
GitHub Stars
6.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
654
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
104
Stacks
761
Followers
158
Followers
470
Votes
3
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    System-docker
Pros
  • 3
    Open Source
  • 2
    Autosinchronize the changes to deploy
  • 1
    Online service, no need to install anything
Integrations
Linux
Linux
Docker
Docker
Rancher
Rancher
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to RancherOS, Argo?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Ubuntu

Ubuntu

Ubuntu is an ancient African word meaning ‘humanity to others’. It also means ‘I am what I am because of who we all are’. The Ubuntu operating system brings the spirit of Ubuntu to the world of computers.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Debian

Debian

Debian systems currently use the Linux kernel or the FreeBSD kernel. Linux is a piece of software started by Linus Torvalds and supported by thousands of programmers worldwide. FreeBSD is an operating system including a kernel and other software.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Arch Linux

Arch Linux

A lightweight and flexible Linux distribution that tries to Keep It Simple.

Fedora

Fedora

Fedora is a Linux-based operating system that provides users with access to the latest free and open source software, in a stable, secure and easy to manage form. Fedora is the largest of many free software creations of the Fedora Project. Because of its predominance, the word "Fedora" is often used interchangeably to mean both the Fedora Project and the Fedora operating system.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot