Around vs Mediasoup

Overview

Around

Stacks15

Followers16

Votes0

Mediasoup

Stacks20

Followers91

Votes0

GitHub Stars6.9K

Forks1.2K

Around vs Mediasoup: What are the differences?

Introduction: Here are the key differences between Around and Mediasoup:

Architecture: Around is a client-server architecture solution for building real-time video chat applications, whereas Mediasoup is a server-based media server framework for building real-time communication applications.
Technology Stack: Around primarily uses WebRTC for real-time communication, while Mediasoup uses WebRTC as well but also includes additional layers for media processing and handling.
Scalability: Around is designed to handle small to medium-sized video chat applications, while Mediasoup is built for large-scale real-time communication applications that require high scalability.
Customization: Around offers limited customization options compared to Mediasoup, which provides more flexibility and control over the media handling aspects of the application.
Community Support: Mediasoup has a more active and extensive community support compared to Around, making it easier to find resources, tutorials, and help when building applications using the framework.
Use Cases: Around is more suitable for simpler video chat applications or small-scale deployments, while Mediasoup is more geared towards complex real-time communication applications that require advanced media processing capabilities.

In Summary, the key differences between Around and Mediasoup lie in their architecture, technology stack, scalability, customization options, community support, and use cases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Around	Mediasoup
Quick, next-gen video calls. It combines inventions in audio technology & a fresh perspective on video UI. Introducing major inventions in signal processing, AI-based background noise filtering, voice proximity detection, and UX.	Mediasoup and its client side libraries provide a super low level API. They are intended to enable different use cases and scenarios, without any constraint or assumption. Some of these use cases are: Group video chat applications, One-to-many (or few-to-many) broadcasting applications in real-time, and RTP streaming.
AI-based camera framing; AI-based auto-mute; New meeting dynamics; Unique audio technology; No team setup required; Designed for maximum privacy	Simulcast and SVC support; Congestion control; Sender and receiver bandwidth estimation with spatial/temporal layers distribution algorithm; SCTP support (WebRTC DataChannels and SCTP over plain UDP); Extremely powerful (media worker subprocess coded in C++ on top of libuv)
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 6.9K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 1.2K
Stacks 15	Stacks 20
Followers 16	Followers 91
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
Slack Linux Google Chrome macOS Windows Microsoft Edge	Node.js JavaScript C++

What are some alternatives to Around, Mediasoup?

Discord

Discord is a modern free voice & text chat app for groups of gamers. Our resilient Erlang backend running on the cloud has built in DDoS protection with automatic server failover.

Skype

Skype’s text, voice and video make it simple to share experiences with the people that matter to you, wherever they are.

Zoom

Zoom unifies cloud video conferencing, simple online meetings, and cross platform group chat into one easy-to-use platform. Our solution offers the best video, audio, and screen-sharing experience across Zoom Rooms, Windows, Mac, iOS, Android, and H.323/SIP room systems.

Google Meet

It is the business-oriented version of Google's Hangouts platform and is suitable for businesses of all sizes. It allows users to dial in phone numbers to access meetings, thus enabling users with slow internet connection to call in.

Jitsi

Jitsi (acquired by 8x8) is a set of open-source projects that allows you to easily build and deploy secure videoconferencing solutions. At the heart of Jitsi are Jitsi Videobridge and Jitsi Meet, which let you have conferences on the internet, while other projects in the community enable other features such as audio, dial-in, recording, and simulcasting.

Webex

Collaborate with colleagues across your organization, or halfway across the planet. Meet online and share files, information, and expertise. Collaborate from wherever you are with Webex mobile apps for IPhone, iPad, Android, or Blackberry. If you can get online, you can work together.

Viber

It is a cross-platform instant messaging and voice over IP application provided as freeware for the Microsoft Windows, macOS, Linux, Android and iOS platforms.

Jami

It is a free software for universal communication which respects freedoms and privacy of its users. Its main goal is to provide a communication framework and end-user applications to make audio or video calls, send text messages and make generic data transfers. It makes this possible via multiple paradigms: a modern decentralized approach using a DHT to find peers or classical centralized SIP as a soft-phone.

WebRTC

It is a free, open project that enables web browsers with Real-Time Communications (RTC) capabilities via simple JavaScript APIs. The WebRTC components have been optimized to best serve this purpose.

TeamViewer

Its aproprietary software for remote control, desktop sharing, online meetings, web conferencing and file transfer between computers.

Related Comparisons

Around vs Mediasoup: What are the differences?

Introduction: Here are the key differences between Around and Mediasoup:

Architecture: Around is a client-server architecture solution for building real-time video chat applications, whereas Mediasoup is a server-based media server framework for building real-time communication applications.
Technology Stack: Around primarily uses WebRTC for real-time communication, while Mediasoup uses WebRTC as well but also includes additional layers for media processing and handling.
Scalability: Around is designed to handle small to medium-sized video chat applications, while Mediasoup is built for large-scale real-time communication applications that require high scalability.
Customization: Around offers limited customization options compared to Mediasoup, which provides more flexibility and control over the media handling aspects of the application.
Community Support: Mediasoup has a more active and extensive community support compared to Around, making it easier to find resources, tutorials, and help when building applications using the framework.
Use Cases: Around is more suitable for simpler video chat applications or small-scale deployments, while Mediasoup is more geared towards complex real-time communication applications that require advanced media processing capabilities.

In Summary, the key differences between Around and Mediasoup lie in their architecture, technology stack, scalability, customization options, community support, and use cases.

Around vs Mediasoup

Overview