StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Arquillian vs Karate DSL

Arquillian vs Karate DSL

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Arquillian
Arquillian
Stacks32
Followers48
Votes0
Karate DSL
Karate DSL
Stacks148
Followers268
Votes85

Arquillian vs Karate DSL: What are the differences?

  1. Testing Approach: Arquillian focuses on integration testing and allows you to test real business logic by deploying your application to a container and executing tests against it. On the other hand, Karate DSL is more oriented towards API testing and supports behavior-driven testing with a focus on easy-to-read, plain English syntax for writing tests.

  2. Technology Stack: Arquillian is primarily designed for Java EE applications and integrates seamlessly with various Java EE servers and frameworks. In contrast, Karate DSL is a language-agnostic tool that can be used to test APIs written in any language, making it versatile for testing microservices and web services across different technologies.

  3. Assertion Syntax: Arquillian relies on traditional Java assertion libraries such as JUnit or TestNG for writing assertions in test cases. In comparison, Karate DSL has its own built-in assertion syntax, making it easier for users to write and maintain assertions without the need for external libraries.

  4. Parallel Execution: Arquillian supports parallel test execution out of the box, allowing you to run multiple tests concurrently to reduce test execution time. On the other hand, Karate DSL does not officially support parallel execution natively, although workarounds may exist to achieve parallelism.

  5. Mocking and Stubbing: Arquillian provides built-in support for mocking and stubbing external dependencies using frameworks like Mockito or Arquillian Drone. In contrast, Karate DSL has native support for mocking HTTP responses, making it easier to simulate different scenarios in API testing without the need for external mocking libraries.

  6. Reporting and Documentation: Arquillian offers detailed test reports and integrations with popular CI/CD tools for generating comprehensive test documentation. Karate DSL also provides detailed HTML reports for test results, along with the ability to generate interactive documentation using Cucumber-style feature files.

In Summary, Arquillian and Karate DSL differ in their testing approach, technology stack compatibility, assertion syntax, support for parallel execution, mocking capabilities, and reporting/documentation features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Arquillian
Arquillian
Karate DSL
Karate DSL

It is an integration and functional testing platform that can be used for Java middleware testing. With the main goal of making integration (and functional) tests as simple to write as unit tests, it brings the tests to the runtime environment, freeing developers from managing the runtime from within the test.

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Real Tests; IDE Friendly; Test Enrichment; Classpath Control; Drive the Browser; Debug the Server
Native support for both JSON and XML; Powerful payload assertions with "deep-equals"; Data-driven testing; Easy even for non-programmers; Embedded JavaScript engine; Test-doubles or HTTP mocking built-in; Re-use test scripts as performance-tests; Environment switching; Comprehensive reports, supported by all CI tools
Statistics
Stacks
32
Stacks
148
Followers
48
Followers
268
Votes
0
Votes
85
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 11
    Easy CI integration via cross-platform executable / CLI
  • 9
    Easy for even non-programmers to get started
  • 9
    Simple and meaningful asserts for large responses
  • 7
    Data-driven tests that can even use JSON or CSV sources
  • 5
    Comprehensive documentation and examples
Cons
  • 1
    Complex folder structure, without a defined pattern
  • 1
    Karate uses its own scripting language
  • 1
    There is no IntelliSense support in IDE
  • 1
    Finding errors in code is not easy
  • 1
    Ode support becomes very time consuming and expensive b
Integrations
Java
Java
Selenium
Selenium
Robolectric
Robolectric
JavaScript
JavaScript
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Java
Java
Cucumber
Cucumber
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
JUnit
JUnit
Eclipse
Eclipse

What are some alternatives to Arquillian, Karate DSL?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana