StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Javascript Testing Framework
  5. AVA vs Jasmine

AVA vs Jasmine

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jasmine
Jasmine
Stacks4.8K
Followers1.5K
Votes187
AVA
AVA
Stacks105
Followers205
Votes32

AVA vs Jasmine: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This markdown provides key differences between AVA and Jasmine.

1. **Testing Framework Type**: AVA is a test runner while Jasmine is a behavior-driven development (BDD) testing framework. AVA focuses on running the tests in parallel for faster execution, while Jasmine provides a descriptive language for writing test cases.
2. **Syntax Style**: AVA uses modern syntax such as ES6, async/await, and Arrow functions, making it more suitable for developers familiar with the latest JavaScript features. In contrast, Jasmine uses a more traditional syntax which may appeal to developers who prefer a simpler approach.
3. **Configuration Options**: AVA requires less configuration as it comes with built-in assertion library and has minimalistic setup. On the other hand, Jasmine provides more configuration options and flexibility in terms of customization and setup, allowing users to tailor their testing environments.
4. **Community Support**: Jasmine has been around longer and has a larger community support base with extensive documentation and resources available. AVA, being a newer tool, may have a smaller community but is known for its responsive and active support from developers and contributors.
5. **Test Execution Speed**: Due to its parallel test execution capability, AVA usually runs tests faster compared to Jasmine, which runs tests sequentially. This difference in speed can be significant when dealing with larger test suites.
6. **Test Runner Integration**: AVA can be easily integrated with various test runners and libraries, providing compatibility with different ecosystems. In contrast, Jasmine is more standalone and may require additional effort for integration with other tools or platforms.

In Summary, AVA and Jasmine differ in terms of their testing framework type, syntax style, configuration options, community support, test execution speed, and test runner integration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jasmine, AVA

Abigail
Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

We use Mocha for our FDA verification testing. It's integrated into Meteor, our upstream web application framework. We like how battle tested it is, its' syntax, its' options of reporters, and countless other features. Most everybody can agree on mocha, and that gets us half-way through our FDA verification and validation (V&V) testing strategy.

231k views231k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jasmine
Jasmine
AVA
AVA

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Even though JavaScript is single-threaded, IO in Node.js can happen in parallel due to its async nature. AVA takes advantage of this and runs your tests concurrently, which is especially beneficial for IO heavy tests. In addition, test files are run in parallel as separate processes, giving you even better performance and an isolated environment for each test file.

Statistics
Stacks
4.8K
Stacks
105
Followers
1.5K
Followers
205
Votes
187
Votes
32
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 64
    Can also be used for tdd
  • 49
    Open source
  • 19
    Originally from RSpec
  • 15
    Great community
  • 14
    No dependencies, not even DOM
Cons
  • 2
    Unfriendly error logs
Pros
  • 12
    Simple and fast
  • 6
    Parallel test running
  • 5
    Open source
  • 3
    Test code Instrumenting
  • 3
    Promise support
Cons
  • 1
    No built-in support for DOM
  • 1
    No source files compilation

What are some alternatives to Jasmine, AVA?

Mocha

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

Jest

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Cypress

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

CodeceptJS

CodeceptJS

It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.

Protractor

Protractor

Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

QUnit

QUnit

QUnit is a powerful, easy-to-use JavaScript unit testing framework. It's used by the jQuery, jQuery UI and jQuery Mobile projects and is capable of testing any generic JavaScript code, including itself!

Sorry-cypress

Sorry-cypress

Open-source, self-hosted alternative Cypress Dashboard.

Baretest

Baretest

It is a fast and simple JavaScript test runner. It offers near-instant performance and a brainless API. It makes testing tolerable.

SinonJS

SinonJS

It is a really helpful library when you want to unit test your code. It supports spies, stubs, and mocks. The library has cross browser support and also can run on the server using Node.js.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana