StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Awesomplete vs Select2

Awesomplete vs Select2

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Awesomplete
Awesomplete
Stacks61
Followers8
Votes2
GitHub Stars7.0K
Forks607
Select2
Select2
Stacks3.0K
Followers73
Votes0
GitHub Stars26.0K
Forks6.2K

Awesomplete vs Select2: What are the differences?

Key differences between Awesomplete and Select2

Awesomplete is a lightweight and simple autocomplete javascript library, whereas Select2 is a more feature-rich and customizable autocomplete library.

  1. Implementation: Awesomplete is easy to implement and has a minimalistic design, making it ideal for projects that require a simple autocomplete functionality. On the other hand, Select2 provides a comprehensive set of options and features, making it suitable for more complex projects that need advanced customization.

  2. Customization: Awesomplete has limited customization options, allowing users to modify the basic appearance and behavior of the autocomplete dropdown. In contrast, Select2 offers extensive customization possibilities, allowing users to fully customize the look and feel of the autocomplete dropdown, including themes, templating, and event handling.

  3. Support: As a lightweight library, Awesomplete may have limited support in terms of bug fixes and updates. Select2, being a more widely used and feature-rich library, has better community support, with regular updates and bug fixes.

  4. Dependency: Awesomplete has no dependencies and can be used standalone with ease. However, Select2 requires jQuery as a dependency, which may add an additional overhead to the project if jQuery is not already being used.

  5. Accessibility: Select2 puts a strong emphasis on accessibility, providing support for keyboard navigation, screen readers, and ARIA attributes. While Awesomplete is also accessible, it may not have the same level of support for accessibility features.

  6. Documentation: Awesomplete has a relatively straightforward documentation, with examples and usage guidelines. Select2, being a more complex library, has extensive documentation and a large collection of resources, including API documentation, troubleshooting guides, and community forums.

In summary, Awesomplete is a lightweight and simple autocomplete library that is easy to implement but may lack the customization options and community support compared to Select2, which is a more feature-rich and customizable library with better community support and extensive documentation.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Awesomplete
Awesomplete
Select2
Select2

It is Ultra lightweight, customizable, simple autocomplete widget with zero dependencies, built with modern standards for modern browsers.

It gives you a customizable select box with support for searching, tagging, remote data sets, infinite scrolling, and many other highly used options. It comes with support for RTL environments, searching with diacritics and over 40 languages built-in.

Lightweight;Customizable; Simple ;Built with modern standards for modern browsers
comes with support for RTL environments, searching with diacritics and over 40 languages built-in;Using AJAX you can efficiently search large lists of items;Fully skinnable, CSS built with Sass and an optional theme for Bootstrap 3
Statistics
GitHub Stars
7.0K
GitHub Stars
26.0K
GitHub Forks
607
GitHub Forks
6.2K
Stacks
61
Stacks
3.0K
Followers
8
Followers
73
Votes
2
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Zero dependencies
  • 1
    Lightweight
No community feedback yet
Integrations
HTML5
HTML5
JavaScript
JavaScript
Firefox
Firefox
Google Chrome
Google Chrome
Drupal
Drupal
JavaScript
JavaScript
AngularJS
AngularJS
Meteor
Meteor
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Yii
Yii
Django
Django
CSS 3
CSS 3
Firefox
Firefox
Ruby
Ruby

What are some alternatives to Awesomplete, Select2?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase