StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Load Balancer Reverse Proxy
  5. AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) vs Google Cloud Load Balancing

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) vs Google Cloud Load Balancing

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)
AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)
Stacks12.8K
Followers8.8K
Votes59
Google Cloud Load Balancing
Google Cloud Load Balancing
Stacks50
Followers45
Votes0

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) vs Google Cloud Load Balancing: What are the differences?

Key Differences between AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) and Google Cloud Load Balancing

1. Integration with Cloud Infrastructure Providers:

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) is tightly integrated with other AWS services such as Amazon EC2, Auto Scaling, and Amazon Route 53. This allows for seamless scalability and high availability within the AWS ecosystem. On the other hand, Google Cloud Load Balancing is specifically designed for the Google Cloud Platform and provides seamless integration with other Google Cloud services like Google Compute Engine instances.

2. Load Balancer Types:

AWS Elastic Load Balancing offers three types of load balancers: Classic Load Balancer, Network Load Balancer, and Application Load Balancer. These load balancers cater to different types of traffic and offer various features. In comparison, Google Cloud Load Balancing offers two types of load balancers: Network Load Balancer and HTTP(S) Load Balancer. The load balancer types in both platforms are designed to handle specific use cases and traffic types.

3. Global Load Balancing:

Google Cloud Load Balancing provides global load balancing capabilities, allowing traffic to be distributed across multiple regions or across different cloud providers. This ensures high availability and fast response times for users located in different geographic locations. In contrast, AWS Elastic Load Balancing primarily operates within a single region and does not offer global load balancing out of the box.

4. Advanced Monitoring and Analytics:

AWS Elastic Load Balancing offers advanced monitoring and analytics through its integration with AWS CloudWatch. This allows users to gain insights into the performance and health of their load balancers and make data-driven decisions to optimize their application's performance. While Google Cloud Load Balancing also provides monitoring capabilities, AWS CloudWatch offers a more comprehensive set of features and integrations.

5. Autoscaling Integration:

AWS Elastic Load Balancing seamlessly integrates with AWS Auto Scaling, enabling automatic scaling of resources based on the incoming traffic and demand. This ensures that the load balancer can handle varying workloads and maintain optimal performance. Google Cloud Load Balancing also offers autoscaling capabilities but requires additional configuration and integration with Google Cloud's autoscaling features.

6. Pricing Structure:

The pricing structure for AWS Elastic Load Balancing and Google Cloud Load Balancing differs slightly. AWS Elastic Load Balancing charges based on the number of load balancer instances and the amount of data transferred through the load balancer. On the other hand, Google Cloud Load Balancing charges based on the number of forwarding rules and backend services used. The specific pricing details should be considered based on the specific requirements and usage patterns.

In Summary, AWS Elastic Load Balancing and Google Cloud Load Balancing have key differences in integration with cloud infrastructure providers, load balancer types offered, global load balancing capabilities, monitoring and analytics features, autoscaling integration, and pricing structure.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)
AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)
Google Cloud Load Balancing
Google Cloud Load Balancing

With Elastic Load Balancing, you can add and remove EC2 instances as your needs change without disrupting the overall flow of information. If one EC2 instance fails, Elastic Load Balancing automatically reroutes the traffic to the remaining running EC2 instances. If the failed EC2 instance is restored, Elastic Load Balancing restores the traffic to that instance. Elastic Load Balancing offers clients a single point of contact, and it can also serve as the first line of defense against attacks on your network. You can offload the work of encryption and decryption to Elastic Load Balancing, so your servers can focus on their main task.

You can scale your applications on Google Compute Engine from zero to full-throttle with it, with no pre-warming needed. You can distribute your load-balanced compute resources in single or multiple regions, close to your users and to meet your high availability requirements.

Distribution of requests to Amazon EC2 instances (servers) in multiple Availability Zones so that the risk of overloading one single instance is minimized. And if an entire Availability Zone goes offline, Elastic Load Balancing routes traffic to instances in other Availability Zones.;Continuous monitoring of the health of Amazon EC2 instances registered with the load balancer so that requests are sent only to the healthy instances. If an instance becomes unhealthy, Elastic Load Balancing stops sending traffic to that instance and spreads the load across the remaining healthy instances.;Support for end-to-end traffic encryption on those networks that use secure (HTTPS/SSL) connections.;The ability to take over the encryption and decryption work from the Amazon EC2 instances, and manage it centrally on the load balancer.;Support for the sticky session feature, which is the ability to "stick" user sessions to specific Amazon EC2 instances.;Association of the load balancer with your domain name. Because the load balancer is the only computer that is exposed to the Internet, you don’t have to create and manage public domain names for the instances that the load balancer manages. You can point the instance's domain records at the load balancer instead and scale as needed (either adding or removing capacity) without having to update the records with each scaling activity.;When used in an Amazon Virtual Private Cloud (Amazon VPC), support for creation and management of security groups associated with your load balancer to provide additional networking and security options.;Supports use of both the Internet Protocol version 4 (IPv4) and Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6).
Autoscaling; No pre-warming needed
Statistics
Stacks
12.8K
Stacks
50
Followers
8.8K
Followers
45
Votes
59
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 48
    Easy
  • 8
    ASG integration
  • 2
    Reliability
  • 1
    Coding
  • 0
    SSL offloading
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Google Cloud Platform
Google Cloud Platform

What are some alternatives to AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB), Google Cloud Load Balancing?

HAProxy

HAProxy

HAProxy (High Availability Proxy) is a free, very fast and reliable solution offering high availability, load balancing, and proxying for TCP and HTTP-based applications.

Traefik

Traefik

A modern HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that makes deploying microservices easy. Traefik integrates with your existing infrastructure components and configures itself automatically and dynamically.

Fly

Fly

Deploy apps through our global load balancer with minimal shenanigans. All Fly-enabled applications get free SSL certificates, accept traffic through our global network of datacenters, and encrypt all traffic from visitors through to application servers.

Envoy

Envoy

Originally built at Lyft, Envoy is a high performance C++ distributed proxy designed for single services and applications, as well as a communication bus and “universal data plane” designed for large microservice “service mesh” architectures.

Hipache

Hipache

Hipache is a distributed proxy designed to route high volumes of http and websocket traffic to unusually large numbers of virtual hosts, in a highly dynamic topology where backends are added and removed several times per second. It is particularly well-suited for PaaS (platform-as-a-service) and other environments that are both business-critical and multi-tenant.

node-http-proxy

node-http-proxy

node-http-proxy is an HTTP programmable proxying library that supports websockets. It is suitable for implementing components such as proxies and load balancers.

Modern DDoS Protection & Edge Security Platform

Modern DDoS Protection & Edge Security Platform

Protect and accelerate your apps with Trafficmind’s global edge — DDoS defense, WAF, API security, CDN/DNS, 99.99% uptime and 24/7 expert team.

DigitalOcean Load Balancer

DigitalOcean Load Balancer

Load Balancers are a highly available, fully-managed service that work right out of the box and can be deployed as fast as a Droplet. Load Balancers distribute incoming traffic across your infrastructure to increase your application's availability.

F5 BIG-IP

F5 BIG-IP

It ensures that applications are always secure and perform the way they should. You get built-in security, traffic management, and performance application services, whether your applications live in a private data center or in the cloud.

GLBC

GLBC

It is a GCE L7 load balancer controller that manages external loadbalancers configured through the Kubernetes Ingress API.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana