StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Azure Multi-Factor Authentication vs RSA SecurID

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication vs RSA SecurID

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication
Azure Multi-Factor Authentication
Stacks4
Followers12
Votes0
RSA SecurID
RSA SecurID
Stacks5
Followers15
Votes0

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication vs RSA SecurID: What are the differences?

Introduction

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) and RSA SecurID are two popular methods of adding an extra layer of security to user authentication processes. While both aim to provide reliable multi-factor authentication, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Integration with cloud services: Azure MFA is a cloud-based solution that seamlessly integrates with Microsoft Azure services, making it easier for organizations already using Azure to implement MFA. On the other hand, RSA SecurID is a hardware-based solution that requires additional infrastructure setup and management.

  2. Authentication methods: Azure MFA supports a variety of authentication methods, including phone calls, text messages, mobile app notification, and biometric verification. RSA SecurID, on the other hand, relies primarily on hardware tokens or software tokens installed on user devices for authentication.

  3. Cost: Azure MFA is typically included as part of the Azure Active Directory (AD) licensing, simplifying licensing and reducing cost for organizations using Azure. RSA SecurID, being a separate solution, requires additional licensing and hardware costs for implementation.

  4. Scalability: Azure MFA can easily scale to accommodate a large number of users and devices, with the ability to add additional authentication methods and adjust policies as needed. RSA SecurID, being hardware-based, may require additional infrastructure investment to scale.

  5. Management and administration: Azure MFA can be managed and administered through a centralized Azure AD portal, providing a streamlined user interface for managing authentication policies, user access, and logging. RSA SecurID often requires a separate management console and may involve more complex administration tasks.

  6. User experience: Azure MFA focuses on providing a seamless and user-friendly experience, allowing users to choose their preferred authentication method and reducing friction during the login process. RSA SecurID, being primarily dependent on hardware tokens, may require users to carry and input additional authentication tokens, which can be less convenient.

In summary, Azure MFA offers easier integration with cloud services, supports a variety of authentication methods, and provides scalability and cost advantages for organizations already using Azure. RSA SecurID, on the other hand, relies on hardware tokens, may require additional infrastructure, and may involve more complex management and administration tasks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication
Azure Multi-Factor Authentication
RSA SecurID
RSA SecurID

It helps safeguard access to data and applications while maintaining simplicity for users. It provides additional security by requiring a second form of authentication and delivers strong authentication via a range of easy to use authentication methods. Users may or may not be challenged for MFA based on configuration decisions that an administrator makes.

It is a mechanism developed by Security Dynamics for performing two-factor authentication for a user to a network resource.

Mobile app as a second factor; Phone call as a second factor; SMS as a second factor; Admin control over verification methods
Modern authentication; Access and SSO; Identity governance and lifecycle
Statistics
Stacks
4
Stacks
5
Followers
12
Followers
15
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Azure Active Directory
Azure Active Directory
Microsoft 365
Microsoft 365
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Azure Multi-Factor Authentication, RSA SecurID?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope