StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Azure Multi-Factor Authentication vs WSO2 Identity Server

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication vs WSO2 Identity Server

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

WSO2 Identity Server
WSO2 Identity Server
Stacks26
Followers81
Votes3
GitHub Stars825
Forks928
Azure Multi-Factor Authentication
Azure Multi-Factor Authentication
Stacks4
Followers12
Votes0

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication vs WSO2 Identity Server: What are the differences?

  1. Cost: A key difference between Azure Multi-Factor Authentication and WSO2 Identity Server is the cost structure. Azure Multi-Factor Authentication typically follows a pay-as-you-go model based on the number of authentications, while WSO2 Identity Server offers a more flexible pricing approach, allowing organizations to choose between subscription-based pricing or usage-based pricing.

  2. Deployment Flexibility: Azure Multi-Factor Authentication is a cloud-based solution provided by Microsoft and requires organizations to rely on Microsoft's infrastructure for deployment. In contrast, WSO2 Identity Server can be deployed on-premises, in virtual machines, or in the cloud, providing organizations with more flexibility and control over their deployment environment.

  3. Customization and Extensibility: WSO2 Identity Server offers extensive customization and extensibility options, allowing organizations to tailor the authentication process to their specific requirements by adding custom authentication steps, integrating with various identity providers, or defining custom policies. Azure Multi-Factor Authentication, while offering some customization options, may not provide the same level of flexibility as WSO2 Identity Server.

  4. Integration Capabilities: WSO2 Identity Server is known for its strong integration capabilities, providing out-of-the-box support for a wide range of protocols, identity providers, and systems. On the other hand, Azure Multi-Factor Authentication may be more tightly integrated with other Microsoft services and applications, potentially offering a smoother user experience within the Microsoft ecosystem.

  5. Support for Industry Standards: WSO2 Identity Server is designed to comply with industry standards such as SAML, OAuth, and OpenID Connect, making it easier for organizations to integrate with existing systems and adhere to best practices in identity management. Azure Multi-Factor Authentication also supports these standards but may have a stronger focus on Microsoft-specific technologies and protocols.

  6. Scalability and High Availability: WSO2 Identity Server is built to be highly scalable and support high availability configurations, ensuring that organizations can scale their authentication infrastructure to meet growing demands and maintain continuous access for users. Azure Multi-Factor Authentication may offer similar scalability and high availability features, but organizations should consider the specific requirements of their environment when choosing between the two solutions.

In Summary, Azure Multi-Factor Authentication and WSO2 Identity Server differ in cost, deployment flexibility, customization, integration capabilities, support for industry standards, and scalability/high availability options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

WSO2 Identity Server
WSO2 Identity Server
Azure Multi-Factor Authentication
Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

It helps you do single sign-on and identity federation backed by strong and adaptive authentication, securely expose APIs, and manage identities by connecting to heterogeneous user stores. Leverage the power of open-source IAM in your enterprise to innovate fast and build secure Customer IAM (CIAM) solutions to provide an experience your users will love.

It helps safeguard access to data and applications while maintaining simplicity for users. It provides additional security by requiring a second form of authentication and delivers strong authentication via a range of easy to use authentication methods. Users may or may not be challenged for MFA based on configuration decisions that an administrator makes.

Single Sign on (SSO); Identity Federation; Strong and Adaptive Authentication ; Account management and provisioning ; Access Control ; API and Microservices security ; Identity Analytics
Mobile app as a second factor; Phone call as a second factor; SMS as a second factor; Admin control over verification methods
Statistics
GitHub Stars
825
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
928
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
26
Stacks
4
Followers
81
Followers
12
Votes
3
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    It's a open source solution
  • 1
    OpenID and SAML support
  • 1
    Supports multiple identity provider
No community feedback yet
Integrations
OAuth.io
OAuth.io
OpenID Connect
OpenID Connect
Azure Active Directory
Azure Active Directory
Microsoft 365
Microsoft 365

What are some alternatives to WSO2 Identity Server, Azure Multi-Factor Authentication?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope