StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. Azure Repos vs Google Cloud Source Repositories

Azure Repos vs Google Cloud Source Repositories

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Google Cloud Source Repositories
Google Cloud Source Repositories
Stacks91
Followers160
Votes0
Azure Repos
Azure Repos
Stacks64
Followers92
Votes0

Azure Repos vs Google Cloud Source Repositories: What are the differences?

Introduction

Azure Repos and Google Cloud Source Repositories are both version control systems that allow developers to manage their code repositories. However, there are several key differences between these two platforms that set them apart.

  1. Integration with Cloud Platform Services: Azure Repos is tightly integrated with other Azure services, such as Azure Boards and Azure Pipelines, providing a seamless end-to-end software development experience. On the other hand, Google Cloud Source Repositories are integrated with Google Cloud Platform, allowing developers to leverage other Google Cloud services like Cloud Build and Cloud Functions.

  2. Authentication and Access Control: Azure Repos uses Azure Active Directory for authentication and access control, providing robust security features such as two-factor authentication and conditional access policies. Google Cloud Source Repositories utilize Google Cloud IAM for authentication and access control, allowing developers to manage access permissions using Google-managed roles and custom roles.

  3. Pricing Model: Azure Repos offers a fixed per-user pricing model, where each user is licensed to access the repository. In contrast, Google Cloud Source Repositories follow a usage-based pricing model, where developers are charged based on the storage and network resources consumed by their repositories.

  4. Support for Repository Types: Azure Repos supports both Git and Team Foundation Version Control (TFVC), providing flexibility for developers to choose the version control system that best suits their needs. Google Cloud Source Repositories, on the other hand, only support Git repositories.

  5. Integration with CI/CD Pipelines: Azure Repos seamlessly integrates with Azure Pipelines, a robust continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) platform, allowing developers to automate build and deployment processes. In comparison, Google Cloud Source Repositories can be easily integrated with Google Cloud Build, which provides similar capabilities for automating build and deployment workflows.

  6. Supported Features: Azure Repos offers advanced features such as code reviews, pull requests, and branch policies, which help in ensuring code quality and enforcing development best practices. Google Cloud Source Repositories provide more basic version control features like code browsing, history tracking, and simple collaboration tools.

In summary, Azure Repos provides deep integration with the Azure ecosystem, advanced security features, and support for different version control systems (Git and TFVC). On the other hand, Google Cloud Source Repositories offer easier integration with Google Cloud Platform services, a flexible pricing model, and basic version control features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Google Cloud Source Repositories
Google Cloud Source Repositories
Azure Repos
Azure Repos

Collaborate easily and securely manage your code on a fully featured, scalable, private Git repository. Extend your Git workflow by connecting to other GCP tools, including Cloud Build, App Engine, Stackdriver, and Cloud Pub/Sub. Get access to fast, indexed powerful code search across all your owned repositories to save time.

It is a set of version control tools that you can use to manage your code. Get unlimited private Git repository hosting and support across all scales, from a single hobby project for TFVC to the world's largest repository.

Unlimited private Git repositories;Deploy directly from Cloud Source Repositories;Automatically build and test your source code;Versioning and aliasing for serverless requests;Debug in production;Detailed audit logs;
Free private Git repositories, pull requests and code search; Support for all Git clients; Web hooks and API integration; Semantic code search
Statistics
Stacks
91
Stacks
64
Followers
160
Followers
92
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Git
Git
GitLab
GitLab
GitHub
GitHub
Google App Engine
Google App Engine
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Stackdriver
Stackdriver
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Azure Pipelines
Azure Pipelines
Git
Git

What are some alternatives to Google Cloud Source Repositories, Azure Repos?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana