Azure Websites vs Jelastic

Overview

Jelastic

Stacks38

Followers60

Votes74

Azure Websites

Stacks404

Followers404

Votes23

Azure Websites vs Jelastic: What are the differences?

Pricing Model: Azure Websites offers a flexible pricing model based on the selected hardware configuration and number of instances, providing options for both free and paid plans. On the other hand, Jelastic follows a usage-based pricing model, charging users for the actual resources utilized, enabling cost optimization by scaling up or down as needed.
Platform Support: Azure Websites is specifically designed for hosting websites and supports a wide range of programming languages, frameworks, and content management systems (CMS), including .NET, Java, PHP, and WordPress. Jelastic, on the other hand, is a multi-cloud platform that can host various applications, including websites, but also supports Java, PHP, Node.js, Python, Ruby, and Docker containers.
Scaling Options: Azure Websites provides horizontal and vertical scaling options, allowing users to scale up their website resources (such as CPU, RAM) or scale out by adding multiple instances. Jelastic, on the other hand, offers automatic vertical scaling, allowing the platform to adjust the allocated resources based on the application's needs without manual configuration.
Deployment Flexibility: With Azure Websites, users have the flexibility to deploy code via various methods, including FTP, Git, TFS, or even Continuous Deployment using tools like Azure DevOps. Jelastic also supports various deployment methods, including Git and FTP, but additionally offers integration with popular IDEs such as Eclipse and IntelliJ IDEA.
High Availability and Load Balancing: Azure Websites ensures high availability and load balancing through its seamless integration with Azure Traffic Manager, allowing users to distribute traffic across multiple instances or regions. Jelastic also provides high availability and load balancing capabilities through built-in clustering and replication features, ensuring optimal performance and uptime.
Storage and Database Options: Azure Websites offers seamless integration with Azure Storage services, allowing users to store and retrieve data easily. It also supports various database options, including Azure SQL Database, MySQL, and PostgreSQL. Jelastic, on the other hand, provides integration with external storage providers like Amazon S3, as well as support for distributed file systems, and offers a wide range of databases, including MySQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB, MongoDB, and Cassandra.

In Summary, Azure Websites offers flexible pricing, comprehensive platform support, various scaling options, flexible deployment methods, high availability and load balancing through Traffic Manager, and seamless integration with Azure Storage and databases; while Jelastic follows a usage-based pricing model, supports multi-cloud deployment with various programming languages and containers, offers automatic vertical scaling, integration with IDEs, built-in clustering, support for external storage providers, and a wide range of databases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Jelastic	Azure Websites
Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.	Azure Websites is a fully managed Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) that enables you to build, deploy and scale enterprise-grade web Apps in seconds. Focus on your application code, and let Azure take care of the infrastructure to scale and securely run it for you.
Public, Private, Hybrid and Multi-Cloud deployments;Support of microservices and legacy applications with zero code changes;Automated continuous integration, delivery and upgrade processes;More than 50 certified containers out-of-the-box;Managed multi-tenant Kubernetes and Docker containers support;Automatic vertical and horizontal scaling according to applications load;Superb developer web portal for easy provisioning, scaling and updating environments;Open API, CLI and SSH access;Automated replication for application servers and databases;Comprehensive billing engine, quotas and access control policies	.NET, Java, PHP, Node.js, Python;Built-in AutoScale and Load Balancing;High Availability with Auto-Patching;Continuous Deployment with Git, TFS, GitHub;SQL Databases, MySQL, DocumentDB, Search, MongoDB;WordPress, Umbraco, Joomla, Drupal
Statistics
Stacks 38	Stacks 404
Followers 60	Followers 404
Votes 74	Votes 23
Pros & Cons
Pros 13 Automatic scaling 12 Managed hosting 12 Pay-per-Use on an hourly basis 8 Constantly evolving 6 Multiple hosting providers	Pros 17 Ease of deployment 6 Free plans for students
Integrations
Spring Boot Jenkins Kubernetes Docker WordPress PostgreSQL NGINX MongoDB Cassandra GitLab	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Jelastic, Azure Websites?

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

PythonAnywhere

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

Related Comparisons

Azure Websites vs Jelastic: What are the differences?

Pricing Model: Azure Websites offers a flexible pricing model based on the selected hardware configuration and number of instances, providing options for both free and paid plans. On the other hand, Jelastic follows a usage-based pricing model, charging users for the actual resources utilized, enabling cost optimization by scaling up or down as needed.
Platform Support: Azure Websites is specifically designed for hosting websites and supports a wide range of programming languages, frameworks, and content management systems (CMS), including .NET, Java, PHP, and WordPress. Jelastic, on the other hand, is a multi-cloud platform that can host various applications, including websites, but also supports Java, PHP, Node.js, Python, Ruby, and Docker containers.
Scaling Options: Azure Websites provides horizontal and vertical scaling options, allowing users to scale up their website resources (such as CPU, RAM) or scale out by adding multiple instances. Jelastic, on the other hand, offers automatic vertical scaling, allowing the platform to adjust the allocated resources based on the application's needs without manual configuration.
Deployment Flexibility: With Azure Websites, users have the flexibility to deploy code via various methods, including FTP, Git, TFS, or even Continuous Deployment using tools like Azure DevOps. Jelastic also supports various deployment methods, including Git and FTP, but additionally offers integration with popular IDEs such as Eclipse and IntelliJ IDEA.
High Availability and Load Balancing: Azure Websites ensures high availability and load balancing through its seamless integration with Azure Traffic Manager, allowing users to distribute traffic across multiple instances or regions. Jelastic also provides high availability and load balancing capabilities through built-in clustering and replication features, ensuring optimal performance and uptime.
Storage and Database Options: Azure Websites offers seamless integration with Azure Storage services, allowing users to store and retrieve data easily. It also supports various database options, including Azure SQL Database, MySQL, and PostgreSQL. Jelastic, on the other hand, provides integration with external storage providers like Amazon S3, as well as support for distributed file systems, and offers a wide range of databases, including MySQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB, MongoDB, and Cassandra.

Azure Websites vs Jelastic

Overview