StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Azure Websites vs Modulus

Azure Websites vs Modulus

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Modulus
Modulus
Stacks19
Followers22
Votes18
Azure Websites
Azure Websites
Stacks404
Followers404
Votes23

Azure Websites vs Modulus: What are the differences?

  1. Cost Structure: Azure Websites charges based on the resources utilized, such as memory and CPU, while Modulus charges based on the number of containers or instances deployed.
  2. Scaling Abilities: Azure Websites offers automatic scaling based on demand, whereas Modulus allows manual scaling by adding or removing containers.
  3. Deployment Process: Azure Websites supports various deployment methods, including FTP, Git, and CI/CD integration, while Modulus mainly relies on Git for deployments.
  4. Built-in Monitoring Tools: Azure Websites provides built-in monitoring tools like Application Insights for performance tracking, whereas Modulus may require third-party solutions for monitoring.
  5. Supported Programming Languages: Azure Websites supports a wide range of programming languages and frameworks, including .NET, Java, PHP, and Node.js, while Modulus primarily focuses on Node.js applications.
  6. Resource Allocation Control: Azure Websites allows more granular control over resource allocation and configuration settings compared to Modulus.

In Summary, Azure Websites and Modulus differ in cost structure, scaling abilities, deployment processes, monitoring tools, supported programming languages, and resource allocation control.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Modulus
Modulus
Azure Websites
Azure Websites

Modulus is a premier Node.js hosting platform that provides a complete technology stack for application developers. This includes custom SSL, WebSockets, MongoDB, statistics, and more.

Azure Websites is a fully managed Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) that enables you to build, deploy and scale enterprise-grade web Apps in seconds. Focus on your application code, and let Azure take care of the infrastructure to scale and securely run it for you.

Simple Scalability;Powerful Statistics;Multiple Node Versions;Integrated Mongo Database;Persistent Storage;CLI Deployment;Custom Domains;Free Custom-Domain SSL
.NET, Java, PHP, Node.js, Python;Built-in AutoScale and Load Balancing;High Availability with Auto-Patching;Continuous Deployment with Git, TFS, GitHub;SQL Databases, MySQL, DocumentDB, Search, MongoDB;WordPress, Umbraco, Joomla, Drupal
Statistics
Stacks
19
Stacks
404
Followers
22
Followers
404
Votes
18
Votes
23
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 13
    Easy to set up and scale
  • 5
    One of the best meteor hosting providers
Pros
  • 17
    Ease of deployment
  • 6
    Free plans for students
Integrations
MongoDB
MongoDB
Keen
Keen
IronMQ
IronMQ
Twilio SendGrid
Twilio SendGrid
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Modulus, Azure Websites?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase