StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Java Build Tools
  5. Bazel vs CMake

Bazel vs CMake

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CMake
CMake
Stacks4.0K
Followers294
Votes1
Bazel
Bazel
Stacks314
Followers579
Votes133

Bazel vs CMake: What are the differences?

Bazel and CMake are popular build systems used in software development. Here are the key differences between Bazel and CMake:

  1. Build Language and Configuration: Bazel uses a custom domain-specific language (DSL) called Starlark for defining build rules, while CMake relies on a script-based configuration language using CMakeLists.txt files. Bazel's declarative approach describes file relationships, dependencies, and targets, while CMake's script-based approach includes commands and directives to define the project's build process.

  2. Build System Efficiency: Bazel uses a content-based build approach where each build target is associated with a unique key based on its inputs. Bazel can skip the build process for targets that have not changed, resulting in faster builds. It also supports distributed caching and remote execution for scalable and parallel builds across multiple machines or a distributed build farm. CMake, on the other hand, typically relies on more traditional build systems, and the efficiency of the build process may depend on the underlying build tool (e.g., make, Ninja) used by CMake.

  3. Language Support and Ecosystem: Bazel is designed to be language-agnostic and supports various programming languages, including C++, Java, Python, and more. It provides built-in rules and toolchains for different languages, making it easier to set up and configure multi-language projects. Bazel also integrates well with other tools such as TensorFlow and Android, and has a growing community and ecosystem. CMake, while also supporting multiple programming languages, is more commonly associated with C and C++ projects. It has a mature ecosystem with wide adoption, especially in the C++ community, and supports integration with various build tools, libraries, and IDEs.

  4. Project Size and Complexity: Bazel is ideal for large-scale projects with complex dependencies and multiple targets, providing fine-grained control and efficient handling of codebases. CMake is versatile, suited for smaller to medium-sized projects, and adaptable to different project sizes and structures with its modular approach and support for external dependencies.

In summary, Bazel and CMake are both powerful build systems. Bazel offers an efficient and language-agnostic build system with advanced caching and remote execution capabilities, while CMake provides a script-based configuration language and a mature ecosystem, particularly for C and C++ projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

CMake
CMake
Bazel
Bazel

It is used to control the software compilation process using simple platform and compiler independent configuration files, and generate native makefiles and workspaces that can be used in the compiler environment of the user's choice.

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

-
Multi-language support: Bazel supports Java, Objective-C and C++ out of the box, and can be extended to support arbitrary programming languages;High-level build language: Projects are described in the BUILD language, a concise text format that describes a project as sets of small interconnected libraries, binaries and tests. By contrast, with tools like Make you have to describe individual files and compiler invocations;Multi-platform support: The same tool and the same BUILD files can be used to build software for different architectures, and even different platforms. At Google, we use Bazel to build both server applications running on systems in our data centers and client apps running on mobile phones;Reproducibility: In BUILD files, each library, test, and binary must specify its direct dependencies completely. Bazel uses this dependency information to know what must be rebuilt when you make changes to a source file, and which tasks can run in parallel. This means that all builds are incremental and will always produce the same result;Scalable: Bazel can handle large builds
Statistics
Stacks
4.0K
Stacks
314
Followers
294
Followers
579
Votes
1
Votes
133
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Has package registry
Pros
  • 28
    Fast
  • 20
    Deterministic incremental builds
  • 17
    Correct
  • 16
    Multi-language
  • 14
    Enforces declared inputs/outputs
Cons
  • 3
    No Windows Support
  • 2
    Bad IntelliJ support
  • 1
    Poor windows support for some languages
  • 1
    Lack of Documentation
  • 1
    Constant breaking changes
Integrations
No integrations available
Java
Java
Objective-C
Objective-C
C++
C++

What are some alternatives to CMake, Bazel?

Apache Maven

Apache Maven

Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

Gradle

Gradle

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

Pants

Pants

Pants is a build system for Java, Scala and Python. It works particularly well for a source code repository that contains many distinct projects.

JitPack

JitPack

JitPack is an easy to use package repository for Gradle/Sbt and Maven projects. We build GitHub projects on demand and provides ready-to-use packages.

SBT

SBT

It is similar to Java's Maven and Ant. Its main features are: Native support for compiling Scala code and integrating with many Scala test frameworks.

Buck

Buck

Buck encourages the creation of small, reusable modules consisting of code and resources, and supports a variety of languages on many platforms.

Apache Ant

Apache Ant

Ant is a Java-based build tool. In theory, it is kind of like Make, without Make's wrinkles and with the full portability of pure Java code.

Please

Please

Please is a cross-language build system with an emphasis on high performance, extensibility and reproduceability. It supports a number of popular languages and can automate nearly any aspect of your build process.

Sonatype Nexus

Sonatype Nexus

It is an open source repository that supports many artifact formats, including Docker, Java™ and npm. With the Nexus tool integration, pipelines in your toolchain can publish and retrieve versioned apps and their dependencies

JFrog Artifactory

JFrog Artifactory

It integrates with your existing ecosystem supporting end-to-end binary management that overcomes the complexity of working with different software package management systems, and provides consistency to your CI/CD workflow.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana