StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. TestCafe vs behave

TestCafe vs behave

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

behave
behave
Stacks67
Followers119
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.4K
Forks656
TestCafe
TestCafe
Stacks262
Followers273
Votes26
GitHub Stars9.9K
Forks678

TestCafe vs behave: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between TestCafe and Behave, highlighting the key differences between the two.

  1. Programming Language: TestCafe supports JavaScript as its primary programming language, allowing developers to write tests using JavaScript syntax. On the other hand, Behave uses Python as its primary programming language, enabling developers to write tests in a more Pythonic manner.

  2. Testing Framework: TestCafe is a front-end web testing framework, specifically designed for testing web applications' user interfaces. It provides built-in functionalities for handling multiple browsers and performing cross-browser testing. In contrast, Behave is a behavior-driven development (BDD) testing framework that integrates with the Gherkin language. It is primarily used for testing application behavior using plain-text human-readable scenarios.

  3. Execution Model: TestCafe executes tests directly in the browser, utilizing its own libraries and automation techniques. This enables TestCafe to overcome the limitations and security restrictions imposed by cross-origin policies. On the other hand, Behave relies on Selenium WebDriver to interact with browsers and execute tests, which can result in additional dependencies and configuration requirements.

  4. Parallel Execution: TestCafe inherently supports parallel test execution across multiple browsers, allowing developers to save time by running tests concurrently. In contrast, Behave does not have native support for parallel execution. However, developers can implement custom parallelization techniques using tools like Behave-Parallel to achieve parallel execution.

  5. Reporting and Output: TestCafe provides user-friendly and customizable HTML reports, which include detailed information about test runs, assertions, failed tests, screenshots, and videos. Behave, being a BDD framework, provides human-readable and easily understandable reports in plain-text format, facilitating collaboration between business stakeholders and development teams.

  6. Community Support and Ecosystem: TestCafe has a growing community support base with active contributions from the developer community. It offers a range of plugins and extensions to enhance testing capabilities, such as those for CI/CD integration and browser emulators. Behave also has an active community but may have a smaller user base compared to TestCafe. It provides integration with Gherkin-based tools and frameworks and allows developers to leverage the existing BDD ecosystem.

In Summary, TestCafe and Behave differ in terms of programming language, testing framework, execution model, parallel execution support, reporting and output formats, and community support. While TestCafe focuses on web UI testing and offers cross-browser testing capabilities, Behave emphasizes behavior-driven development and facilitates collaboration with business stakeholders through its plain-text reports.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

behave
behave
TestCafe
TestCafe

It is behaviour-driven development, Python style. It uses tests written in a natural language style, backed up by Python code.

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

bdd; tests; tdd
Create stable tests (and no manual timeouts); Write in latest JS or TypeScript; Detect JS errors in your code; Launch concurrent tests; Build readable tests with PageObject; Include tests in continuous integration system; Rapid test development
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.4K
GitHub Stars
9.9K
GitHub Forks
656
GitHub Forks
678
Stacks
67
Stacks
262
Followers
119
Followers
273
Votes
0
Votes
26
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 8
    Cross-browser testing
  • 4
    Open source
  • 4
    Easy setup/installation
  • 4
    Built in waits
  • 3
    UI End to End testing
Cons
  • 9
    No longer free
Integrations
Python
Python
Django
Django
Flask
Flask
TypeScript
TypeScript
JavaScript
JavaScript
Jenkins
Jenkins
Travis CI
Travis CI
TeamCity
TeamCity

What are some alternatives to behave, TestCafe?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Codeception

Codeception

Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana