Bitbucket Pipelines vs Github Actions

Overview

Bitbucket Pipelines

Stacks350

Followers368

Votes0

GitHub Actions

Stacks48.2K

Followers3.1K

Votes27

Bitbucket Pipelines vs Github Actions: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Bitbucket Pipelines and GitHub Actions are both continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) platforms that aim to automate software development processes. While they have similar functionalities, there are key differences between the two platforms that make each suited for different use cases.

Integration with the platform: Bitbucket Pipelines is built directly into the Bitbucket cloud platform, making it a natural choice for teams already using Bitbucket for source code management. On the other hand, GitHub Actions is tightly integrated into the GitHub platform, making it a seamless choice for GitHub users. This integration allows for easier collaboration, issue tracking, and project management within the respective platforms.
Syntax and configuration: Bitbucket Pipelines uses a YAML-based configuration file approach, where the pipeline steps and their configuration are specified in a single YAML file. GitHub Actions, on the other hand, uses a similar YAML-based syntax but offers the flexibility to define workflows as code through multiple files. GitHub Actions also provides a rich set of pre-configured actions that can be easily reused, reducing the need for custom configurations.
Pricing and scalability: Bitbucket Pipelines offers a limited number of build minutes for free and has tiered pricing for additional usage. GitHub Actions, in contrast, provides a generous amount of included minutes for free and charges based on usage beyond the free allocation. This difference in pricing model and allocation can impact the scalability and cost considerations for teams with varying development needs.
Community and ecosystem: GitHub has a larger and more active community compared to Bitbucket, which translates into a more extensive ecosystem of community-created actions and workflows. This vibrant community contributes to a wider range of examples, resources, and support available for GitHub Actions users. Bitbucket Pipelines, while still having a growing community, may have fewer options and examples available for complex workflows or unique integration requirements.
Availability of hosted runners: GitHub Actions provides a pool of hosted runners that can be used to execute workflows, including Linux, Windows, and macOS environments. This allows for better flexibility and convenience as users do not need to maintain their own infrastructure. Bitbucket Pipelines, while providing the ability to use custom runners, lacks the out-of-the-box availability of hosted runners, making it potentially more challenging to set up and maintain the necessary infrastructure.
Ease of setup and configuration: GitHub Actions, with its tight integration with the GitHub platform, offers a more user-friendly setup and configuration experience. The ability to define workflows through the GitHub UI and leverage pre-configured actions makes it easier for beginners and non-technical users to get started with CI/CD. Bitbucket Pipelines, while still offering ease of use, may require additional steps for initial setup and configuration, especially for teams new to the Bitbucket platform.

In summary, Bitbucket Pipelines and GitHub Actions differ in their platform integration, syntax and configuration, pricing model, community support, availability of hosted runners, and ease of setup. The choice between the two platforms depends on factors such as existing platform usage, specific workflow requirements, community support, and cost considerations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Bitbucket Pipelines, GitHub Actions

Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceon

CircleCI

Drone.io

GitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket Pipelines	GitHub Actions
It is an Integrated continuous integration and continuous deployment for Bitbucket Cloud that's trivial to set up, automating your code from test to production. Our mission is to enable all teams to ship software faster by driving the practice of continuous delivery.	It makes it easy to automate all your software workflows, now with world-class CI/CD. Build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub. Make code reviews, branch management, and issue triaging work the way you want.
Continuous integration and delivery; Map the branch structure; Run as service; Extend your workflow; Go multilingual with Docker; Use environment Variables; Skip the queue;	Multiple workflow files support; Free and open source; Workflow run interface; Search for actions in GitHub Marketplace; Integrated with Github's Checks API; Logs and artifacts downloading support
Statistics
Stacks 350	Stacks 48.2K
Followers 368	Followers 3.1K
Votes 0	Votes 27
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 8 Integration with GitHub 5 Free 3 Easy to duplicate a workflow 3 Ready actions in Marketplace 2 Read actions in Marketplace Cons 5 Lacking [skip ci] 4 Lacking allow failure 3 Lacking job specific badges 2 No ssh login to servers 1 No manual launch
Integrations
No integrations available	GitHub

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket Pipelines, GitHub Actions?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Airflow

Use Airflow to author workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks. The Airflow scheduler executes your tasks on an array of workers while following the specified dependencies. Rich command lines utilities makes performing complex surgeries on DAGs a snap. The rich user interface makes it easy to visualize pipelines running in production, monitor progress and troubleshoot issues when needed.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket Pipelines vs Github Actions: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Integration with the platform: Bitbucket Pipelines is built directly into the Bitbucket cloud platform, making it a natural choice for teams already using Bitbucket for source code management. On the other hand, GitHub Actions is tightly integrated into the GitHub platform, making it a seamless choice for GitHub users. This integration allows for easier collaboration, issue tracking, and project management within the respective platforms.
Syntax and configuration: Bitbucket Pipelines uses a YAML-based configuration file approach, where the pipeline steps and their configuration are specified in a single YAML file. GitHub Actions, on the other hand, uses a similar YAML-based syntax but offers the flexibility to define workflows as code through multiple files. GitHub Actions also provides a rich set of pre-configured actions that can be easily reused, reducing the need for custom configurations.
Pricing and scalability: Bitbucket Pipelines offers a limited number of build minutes for free and has tiered pricing for additional usage. GitHub Actions, in contrast, provides a generous amount of included minutes for free and charges based on usage beyond the free allocation. This difference in pricing model and allocation can impact the scalability and cost considerations for teams with varying development needs.
Community and ecosystem: GitHub has a larger and more active community compared to Bitbucket, which translates into a more extensive ecosystem of community-created actions and workflows. This vibrant community contributes to a wider range of examples, resources, and support available for GitHub Actions users. Bitbucket Pipelines, while still having a growing community, may have fewer options and examples available for complex workflows or unique integration requirements.
Availability of hosted runners: GitHub Actions provides a pool of hosted runners that can be used to execute workflows, including Linux, Windows, and macOS environments. This allows for better flexibility and convenience as users do not need to maintain their own infrastructure. Bitbucket Pipelines, while providing the ability to use custom runners, lacks the out-of-the-box availability of hosted runners, making it potentially more challenging to set up and maintain the necessary infrastructure.
Ease of setup and configuration: GitHub Actions, with its tight integration with the GitHub platform, offers a more user-friendly setup and configuration experience. The ability to define workflows through the GitHub UI and leverage pre-configured actions makes it easier for beginners and non-technical users to get started with CI/CD. Bitbucket Pipelines, while still offering ease of use, may require additional steps for initial setup and configuration, especially for teams new to the Bitbucket platform.

Bitbucket Pipelines vs Github Actions

Overview