StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Bootstrap vs tachyons

Bootstrap vs tachyons

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Stacks57.4K
Followers13.2K
Votes7.7K
GitHub Stars173.6K
Forks79.2K
tachyons
tachyons
Stacks70
Followers79
Votes0
GitHub Stars11.7K
Forks675

Bootstrap vs tachyons: What are the differences?

Key differences between Bootstrap and Tachyons

Bootstrap and Tachyons are both popular CSS frameworks used for building responsive and visually appealing websites. However, they differ in several key aspects.

  1. Syntax and File Size: Bootstrap uses a pre-defined set of class names and selectors that need to be added to HTML elements, which can lead to bloated code and larger file sizes. On the other hand, Tachyons follows a functional CSS approach, where classes are single-purpose and can be combined to create different styles. This results in smaller file sizes and cleaner code.

  2. Design and Customization: Bootstrap offers a wide range of pre-designed components, such as buttons, forms, and navigation bars, with a default aesthetic that can be customized using their extensive set of utility classes. Tachyons, on the other hand, provides a set of atomic CSS classes that allow for greater customization and the ability to create unique designs, but with a steeper learning curve.

  3. Responsiveness: Bootstrap provides responsive grid systems and predefined breakpoints that make it easier to create responsive layouts. Tachyons, on the other hand, offers a more flexible and customizable approach to responsive design, allowing developers to define their own breakpoints and create unique responsive designs.

  4. Browser Compatibility: Bootstrap is designed to be compatible with a wide range of browsers, including older versions and Internet Explorer. Tachyons, on the other hand, follows a mobile-first approach and is optimized for modern browsers, which may result in limited support for older browsers.

  5. Opinionated vs. Unopinionated: Bootstrap is often seen as more opinionated, providing a default set of styles and components that may require additional customization to match specific design requirements. Tachyons, on the other hand, is unopinionated and provides a more modular and flexible approach to building styles, allowing developers to create their own design systems from scratch.

  6. Learning Curve and Documentation: Bootstrap has extensive documentation and a large community, making it easier for beginners to learn and find support. Tachyons, although well-documented, has a steeper learning curve due to its functional CSS approach and may require a deeper understanding of CSS principles.

In summary, Bootstrap provides a more comprehensive and opinionated set of pre-designed components and styles, making it easier to quickly build a website with a consistent aesthetic. Tachyons, on the other hand, offers a more customizable and lightweight approach, allowing for greater flexibility and the ability to create unique designs, albeit with a steeper learning curve.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bootstrap, tachyons

Bridget
Bridget

Full Stack Developer at Bridget Sarah

May 29, 2020

Decided

I do prefer to write things from scratch however when it came to wanting to jump-start the frontend, I found that it was taking me a lot longer hence why needing to use something very fast.

Bootstrap was the boom when it came out, I didn't like it, to be honest, set in its way and a pain to over-ride and in addition, you can tell from a distance if you're using boostrap and as everything looks the same.

I came across Tailwind CSS as I wanted more dynamic features, you could say, I've been now doing it for a few days and I love it a lot. I've been practising with the full stack part installed but I an't we wait until I do a new project, and I'll e able to select exactly what I want. Much faster.

681k views681k
Comments
Daniel
Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceonNew RelicNew RelicNext.jsNext.jsReactReact

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M
Comments
Syed
Syed

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceonBootstrapBootstrapTailwind CSSTailwind CSS

I am planning to redesign my entire application, which is currently in Bootstrap. I heard about Tailwind CSS, and I think its really cool to work with. Is it okay if I use Bootstrap and Tailwind together? I can't remove Bootstrap altogether, as my application is using the js dependencies of Bootstrap, which I don't want to disturb.

739k views739k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
tachyons
tachyons

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Create fast loading, highly readable, and 100% responsive interfaces with as little CSS as possible.

Preprocessors: Bootstrap ships with vanilla CSS, but its source code utilizes the two most popular CSS preprocessors, Less and Sass. Quickly get started with precompiled CSS or build on the source.;One framework, every device: Bootstrap easily and efficiently scales your websites and applications with a single code base, from phones to tablets to desktops with CSS media queries.;Full of features: With Bootstrap, you get extensive and beautiful documentation for common HTML elements, dozens of custom HTML and CSS components, and awesome jQuery plugins.
Mobile-first css architecture; 490 accessible color combinations; 8px baseline grid;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
173.6K
GitHub Stars
11.7K
GitHub Forks
79.2K
GitHub Forks
675
Stacks
57.4K
Stacks
70
Followers
13.2K
Followers
79
Votes
7.7K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1582
    Responsiveness
  • 1193
    UI components
  • 943
    Consistent
  • 779
    Great docs
  • 677
    Flexible
Cons
  • 26
    Javascript is tied to jquery
  • 16
    Every site uses the defaults
  • 15
    Grid system break points aren't ideal
  • 14
    Too much heavy decoration in default look
  • 8
    Verbose styles
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
PostCSS
PostCSS
HTML5
HTML5

What are some alternatives to Bootstrap, tachyons?

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase