Bulma vs Material Design for Angular

Overview

Material Design for Angular

Stacks11.8K

Followers9.6K

Votes522

GitHub Stars16.5K

Forks3.4K

Bulma

Stacks780

Followers855

Votes38

GitHub Stars50.0K

Forks3.9K

Bulma vs Material Design for Angular: What are the differences?

Introduction

Bulma and Material Design for Angular are both popular frameworks used for creating responsive and visually appealing websites. While they share some similarities, there are several key differences between the two.

Grid System: Bulma offers a flexible grid system that allows developers to create responsive layouts using a simple syntax. On the other hand, Material Design for Angular uses the Material Design grid system, which is based on a 12-column grid layout.
Component Library: Bulma includes a wide range of pre-designed components such as buttons, cards, and forms, making it easy for developers to quickly build the UI of their websites. Material Design for Angular, on the other hand, provides a more extensive library of components that align with the Material Design guidelines, giving a consistent look and feel across different platforms.
Customization: Bulma allows developers to easily customize the styles of their components by overriding the default variables. This gives developers more control over the visual appearance of their websites. Material Design for Angular, while also customizable, follows a stricter set of design principles and may require more effort to customize.
Documentation and Community: Bulma has a well-documented and accessible website that provides comprehensive documentation, examples, and guides for developers. It also has an active community that contributes to the growth and support of the framework. Material Design for Angular, being an official implementation of the Material Design guidelines by Google, has extensive documentation and resources available, along with a large community of developers using the framework.
Browser Compatibility: Bulma is designed to be compatible with modern browsers, with support for Internet Explorer 10+ and all modern versions of major browsers. Material Design for Angular, being developed and maintained by Google, ensures better compatibility with Google Chrome and other Chromium-based browsers.
Integration with Angular: Material Design for Angular is specifically designed for Angular applications and seamlessly integrates with Angular's components and ecosystem. It provides features like animations, form validation, and accessibility out of the box. Bulma, on the other hand, is a standalone CSS framework and can be used with any web development framework.

In Summary, Bulma and Material Design for Angular differ in their grid system, component libraries, customization options, documentation and community support, browser compatibility, and integration with Angular.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Material Design for Angular, Bulma

Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceon

New Relic

Next.js

React

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Material Design for Angular	Bulma
Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.	Bulma is a CSS framework based on Flexbox and built with Sass
Statistics
GitHub Stars 16.5K	GitHub Stars 50.0K
GitHub Forks 3.4K	GitHub Forks 3.9K
Stacks 11.8K	Stacks 780
Followers 9.6K	Followers 855
Votes 522	Votes 38
Pros & Cons
Pros 122 Ui components 63 Backed by google 51 Free 51 Backed by angular 47 Javascript Cons 4 No practical examples	Pros 12 Easy setup 6 Easy-to-customize the sass build 6 Community-created themes 5 Great docs 5 Responsive Cons 2 Not yet supporting Vue 3
Integrations
AngularJS	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Material Design for Angular, Bulma?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bulma vs Material Design for Angular: What are the differences?

Introduction

Grid System: Bulma offers a flexible grid system that allows developers to create responsive layouts using a simple syntax. On the other hand, Material Design for Angular uses the Material Design grid system, which is based on a 12-column grid layout.
Component Library: Bulma includes a wide range of pre-designed components such as buttons, cards, and forms, making it easy for developers to quickly build the UI of their websites. Material Design for Angular, on the other hand, provides a more extensive library of components that align with the Material Design guidelines, giving a consistent look and feel across different platforms.
Customization: Bulma allows developers to easily customize the styles of their components by overriding the default variables. This gives developers more control over the visual appearance of their websites. Material Design for Angular, while also customizable, follows a stricter set of design principles and may require more effort to customize.
Documentation and Community: Bulma has a well-documented and accessible website that provides comprehensive documentation, examples, and guides for developers. It also has an active community that contributes to the growth and support of the framework. Material Design for Angular, being an official implementation of the Material Design guidelines by Google, has extensive documentation and resources available, along with a large community of developers using the framework.
Browser Compatibility: Bulma is designed to be compatible with modern browsers, with support for Internet Explorer 10+ and all modern versions of major browsers. Material Design for Angular, being developed and maintained by Google, ensures better compatibility with Google Chrome and other Chromium-based browsers.
Integration with Angular: Material Design for Angular is specifically designed for Angular applications and seamlessly integrates with Angular's components and ecosystem. It provides features like animations, form validation, and accessibility out of the box. Bulma, on the other hand, is a standalone CSS framework and can be used with any web development framework.

Bulma vs Material Design for Angular

Overview

Bulma vs Material Design for Angular: What are the differences?