Overview

UIkIt

Stacks791

Followers417

Votes262

GitHub Stars18.5K

Forks2.3K

Bulma

Stacks780

Followers855

Votes38

GitHub Stars50.0K

Forks3.9K

Bulma vs UIkIt: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between the Bulma and UIkit frameworks. Both Bulma and UIkit are popular front-end frameworks that provide a range of pre-designed components and utilities to help with web development. However, they do have some distinct differences that set them apart.

Grid System: Bulma uses a flexbox-based grid system, which allows for easy alignment and positioning of elements on a web page. It provides a user-friendly grid structure that is responsive and adaptable to different screen sizes. On the other hand, UIkit uses a similar grid system but with the addition of CSS classes for specifying column widths and breakpoints. This makes UIkit's grid system more customizable and flexible compared to Bulma's.
Styling and Customization: Bulma focuses on simplicity and minimalism, providing a clean and modern aesthetic out-of-the-box. It is designed to be easily customizable using Sass variables and mixins without requiring any additional tools or configuration. UIkit, on the other hand, offers a more extensive set of design options and allows for deeper customization through its comprehensive theming system. It provides a wide range of predefined themes, color schemes, and modifiers that can be easily applied to different components.
Component Library: Bulma offers a comprehensive collection of responsive UI components, such as buttons, forms, navigation bars, and cards, along with a set of JavaScript plugins for enhancing functionality. It provides a well-documented and intuitive API for using these components, making it easy to integrate them into a project. UIkit also provides a similar set of components but with additional features, such as dynamic grid, off-canvas navigation, and modal dialogs. UIkit's components are highly modular and lightweight, allowing for better performance and customization.
Browser Compatibility: Bulma is designed to be compatible with all modern browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. It also provides partial support for Internet Explorer 11. On the other hand, UIkit has broader browser compatibility, including Internet Explorer 11, making it a better choice for projects that need to support older browsers.
Community and Support: Bulma has a large and active community of developers, with extensive documentation, tutorials, and community-driven resources available. It also has a dedicated development team that actively maintains and updates the framework. UIkit also has a strong community support, with regular updates and a wide range of third-party extensions and integrations available.
JavaScript Integration: Bulma provides a set of optional JavaScript plugins for enhancing the functionality of its components, such as dropdowns, modals, tabs, and sliders. These plugins are built on top of vanilla JavaScript and can be easily integrated into a project without any dependencies. UIkit, on the other hand, has a more extensive JavaScript ecosystem, with a wide range of built-in modules and utilities. It also supports integration with popular JavaScript frameworks, such as Vue.js and React.

In summary, Bulma and UIkit are both powerful front-end frameworks that offer a range of pre-designed components and utilities for web development. Bulma focuses on simplicity, responsiveness, and ease of use, while UIkit provides additional customization options, broader browser compatibility, and a more extensive JavaScript ecosystem. The choice between the two frameworks ultimately depends on the specific needs and requirements of the project.

🔥 Trending in Frameworks on StackShare

VitePress Frameworks

VitePress

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

2

Advice on UIkIt, Bulma

Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceon

New Relic

Next.js

React

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M

Comments

Sai Karun

Jan 30, 2020

Needs advice

We are re-modifying the existing portal to the new one. Looking out for a CSS framework where over-rides are possible, the performance of page loading, extendable, etc Please suggest between tailwind, UIkit and bootstrap frameworks explaining in detail on different factors. I request your help on the same.

595k views595k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

UIkIt	Bulma
UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.	Bulma is a CSS framework based on Flexbox and built with Sass
LESS - UIkit is developed in LESS to write well-structured, extendable code which is easy to maintain.;Components - A collection of small, responsive components using consistent and conflict-free naming conventions.;Customizer - UIkit's very basic style can be extended with themes and is easy to customize to create your own look.;Responsive - With the mobile-first approach UIkit provides a consistent experience from phones and tablets to desktops.	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 18.5K	GitHub Stars 50.0K
GitHub Forks 2.3K	GitHub Forks 3.9K
Stacks 791	Stacks 780
Followers 417	Followers 855
Votes 262	Votes 38
Pros & Cons
Pros 39 Complete GUI 29 Easy modify 27 Practical 24 Easy to learn 24 Functional	Pros 12 Easy setup 6 Community-created themes 6 Easy-to-customize the sass build 5 Great docs 5 Responsive Cons 2 Not yet supporting Vue 3

What are some alternatives to UIkIt, Bulma?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.