StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. TestComplete vs canopy

TestComplete vs canopy

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TestComplete
TestComplete
Stacks39
Followers60
Votes0
canopy
canopy
Stacks9
Followers12
Votes0
GitHub Stars505
Forks113

TestComplete vs canopy: What are the differences?

What is TestComplete? The Easiest-to-Use Automated UI Testing Tool with Artificial Intelligence. It is an automated UI testing tool that makes it fast and easy to create, maintain, and execute functional tests across desktop, web, and mobile applications. With TestComplete, you can increase test coverage and ensure you ship high-quality, battle-tested software.

What is canopy? *A web testing framework *. It is f# web automation and testing library, built on top of Selenium (friendly to c# also). It makes UI testing simple.

TestComplete and canopy can be primarily classified as "Testing Frameworks" tools.

Some of the features offered by TestComplete are:

  • Building Automated UI Tests
  • Object Recognition Engine now with Artificial Intelligence
  • HTML5 Test Automation

On the other hand, canopy provides the following key features:

  • Solid stabilization layer built on top of Selenium. Death to "brittle, quirky, UI tests"
  • Quick to learn. Even if you've never done UI Automation, and don't know F#
  • Clean, concise API

canopy is an open source tool with 426 GitHub stars and 107 GitHub forks. Here's a link to canopy's open source repository on GitHub.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

TestComplete
TestComplete
canopy
canopy

It is an automated UI testing tool that makes it fast and easy to create, maintain, and execute functional tests across desktop, web, and mobile applications. With TestComplete, you can increase test coverage and ensure you ship high-quality, battle-tested software

It is f# web automation and testing library, built on top of Selenium (friendly to c# also). It makes UI testing simple.

Building Automated UI Tests; Object Recognition Engine now with Artificial Intelligence; HTML5 Test Automation; Data-Driven Testing; Automated Test Reporting & Analysis
Solid stabilization layer built on top of Selenium. Death to "brittle, quirky, UI tests"; Quick to learn. Even if you've never done UI Automation, and don't know F#; Clean, concise API; .net Standard 2.0; MIT License
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
505
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
113
Stacks
39
Stacks
9
Followers
60
Followers
12
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Jenkins
Jenkins
Git
Git
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Jira
Jira
Bugzilla
Bugzilla
C#
C#
F#
F#

What are some alternatives to TestComplete, canopy?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana