Apache Maven vs Capsule

Overview

Apache Maven

Stacks3.4K

Followers1.7K

Votes414

GitHub Stars4.8K

Forks2.8K

Capsule

Stacks3

Followers17

Votes0

GitHub Stars1.2K

Forks100

Apache Maven vs Capsule: What are the differences?

<Apache Maven vs Capsule>

Packaging and Deployment: Apache Maven is primarily a build automation tool used for projects in Java, while Capsule focuses on creating executable JARs that contain all dependencies required to run the application. Capsule simplifies the deployment process by bundling everything into a single executable file, eliminating the need for a separate installation of dependencies.
Configuration Management: Maven relies on XML configuration for defining project structure, dependencies, and build phases, which can be complex and verbose. On the other hand, Capsule uses a more concise and straightforward configuration approach, allowing developers to specify application settings and dependencies with ease.
Dynamic Updates: Capsule supports dynamic updates, enabling applications to download and apply updates without restarting, offering a seamless user experience. Maven does not have built-in support for dynamic updates, requiring manual intervention for any changes to take effect, potentially causing downtime.
Dependency Resolution: Maven uses the central repository to manage dependencies, which can sometimes lead to version conflicts or reliance on outdated libraries. Capsule allows developers to package dependencies within the executable JAR, ensuring compatibility and consistency without external dependencies.
Integration with IDEs: Maven has strong integration with popular IDEs like Eclipse and IntelliJ IDEA, providing seamless build and project management within the IDE. Capsule, on the other hand, may require additional configuration or plugins to integrate with IDEs, making the development process slightly more cumbersome for some users.
Customization and Extensibility: Maven offers a wide range of plugins and extensions to customize the build process, allowing developers to tailor the workflow to specific project requirements. Capsule, while efficient for creating standalone executable JARs, may have limited options for customization or extensibility beyond its core functionalities.

In Summary, Apache Maven and Capsule differ in terms of packaging and deployment approach, configuration management style, support for dynamic updates, dependency resolution strategy, integration with IDEs, and customization options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Maven	Capsule
Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.	Packages any JVM application, no matter how complex, as a single, plain executable JAR. A capsule may directly contain all of the application’s dependencies or simply declare some or all of them, to be downloaded when launched.
Simple project setup that follows best practices - get a new project or module started in seconds;Consistent usage across all projects means no ramp up time for new developers coming onto a project;Superior dependency management including automatic updating, dependency closures (also known as transitive dependencies);Able to easily work with multiple projects at the same time;A large and growing repository of libraries and metadata to use out of the box, and arrangements in place with the largest Open Source projects for real-time availability of their latest releases;Extensible, with the ability to easily write plugins in Java or scripting languages;Instant access to new features with little or no extra configuration;Ant tasks for dependency management and deployment outside of Maven	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 4.8K	GitHub Stars 1.2K
GitHub Forks 2.8K	GitHub Forks 100
Stacks 3.4K	Stacks 3
Followers 1.7K	Followers 17
Votes 414	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 138 Dependency management 70 Necessary evil 60 I’d rather code my app, not my build 48 Publishing packaged artifacts 43 Convention over configuration Cons 6 Complex 1 Inconsistent buillds 0 Not many plugin-alternatives	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Java

What are some alternatives to Apache Maven, Capsule?

Gradle

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

Bazel

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

Pants

Pants is a build system for Java, Scala and Python. It works particularly well for a source code repository that contains many distinct projects.

JitPack

JitPack is an easy to use package repository for Gradle/Sbt and Maven projects. We build GitHub projects on demand and provides ready-to-use packages.

SBT

It is similar to Java's Maven and Ant. Its main features are: Native support for compiling Scala code and integrating with many Scala test frameworks.

Buck

Buck encourages the creation of small, reusable modules consisting of code and resources, and supports a variety of languages on many platforms.

Apache Ant

Ant is a Java-based build tool. In theory, it is kind of like Make, without Make's wrinkles and with the full portability of pure Java code.

Please

Please is a cross-language build system with an emphasis on high performance, extensibility and reproduceability. It supports a number of popular languages and can automate nearly any aspect of your build process.

CMake

It is used to control the software compilation process using simple platform and compiler independent configuration files, and generate native makefiles and workspaces that can be used in the compiler environment of the user's choice.

Sonatype Nexus

It is an open source repository that supports many artifact formats, including Docker, Java™ and npm. With the Nexus tool integration, pipelines in your toolchain can publish and retrieve versioned apps and their dependencies

Related Comparisons

Apache Maven vs Capsule: What are the differences?

<Apache Maven vs Capsule>

Packaging and Deployment: Apache Maven is primarily a build automation tool used for projects in Java, while Capsule focuses on creating executable JARs that contain all dependencies required to run the application. Capsule simplifies the deployment process by bundling everything into a single executable file, eliminating the need for a separate installation of dependencies.
Configuration Management: Maven relies on XML configuration for defining project structure, dependencies, and build phases, which can be complex and verbose. On the other hand, Capsule uses a more concise and straightforward configuration approach, allowing developers to specify application settings and dependencies with ease.
Dynamic Updates: Capsule supports dynamic updates, enabling applications to download and apply updates without restarting, offering a seamless user experience. Maven does not have built-in support for dynamic updates, requiring manual intervention for any changes to take effect, potentially causing downtime.
Dependency Resolution: Maven uses the central repository to manage dependencies, which can sometimes lead to version conflicts or reliance on outdated libraries. Capsule allows developers to package dependencies within the executable JAR, ensuring compatibility and consistency without external dependencies.
Integration with IDEs: Maven has strong integration with popular IDEs like Eclipse and IntelliJ IDEA, providing seamless build and project management within the IDE. Capsule, on the other hand, may require additional configuration or plugins to integrate with IDEs, making the development process slightly more cumbersome for some users.
Customization and Extensibility: Maven offers a wide range of plugins and extensions to customize the build process, allowing developers to tailor the workflow to specific project requirements. Capsule, while efficient for creating standalone executable JARs, may have limited options for customization or extensibility beyond its core functionalities.

Apache Maven vs Capsule

Overview