StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Capybara vs Pumba

Capybara vs Pumba

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Capybara
Capybara
Stacks858
Followers191
Votes15
Pumba
Pumba
Stacks4
Followers10
Votes0

Capybara vs Pumba: What are the differences?

Introduction:
Both Capybara and Pumba are software testing tools used for automated testing of web applications. They both have their unique features and functionalities in the testing environment.

1. **Browser Automation**: Capybara is designed for driving a browser simulating a user interacting with a website, whereas Pumba is mainly focused on API testing and does not have browser automation capabilities.

2. **Syntax and Language Support**: Capybara is primarily used with Ruby language and supports various Ruby testing frameworks, while Pumba is developed with Go programming language and is popular for testing RESTful APIs.

3. **Test Environment Integration**: Capybara is frequently used in combination with Cucumber for behavior-driven development (BDD) testing, providing a higher level of abstraction for writing test scenarios. On the other hand, Pumba integrates well with other tools like Swagger for API documentation and testing.

4. **Community Support and Documentation**: Capybara has a more extensive community support and documentation available online, making it easier for new users to get started and troubleshoot issues. Pumba, being a newer tool, still has limited resources and documentation compared to Capybara.

5. **Ease of Use and Learning Curve**: Capybara is known for its user-friendly API and easier learning curve, making it a suitable choice for beginners in automated testing. Pumba, although powerful, may require more advanced knowledge and expertise due to its lower level of abstraction and configuration options.

6. **Integration with Third-Party Tools**: Capybara can be easily integrated with various third-party tools and services, enhancing its capabilities for different testing scenarios. Pumba, while versatile in API testing, may have limitations in terms of seamless integration with other testing tools.

In Summary, Capybara and Pumba differ in browser automation, syntax/language support, test environment integration, community support/documentation, ease of use/learning curve, and integration with third-party tools.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Capybara
Capybara
Pumba
Pumba

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

It is a chaos testing tool for Docker containers, inspired by Netflix Chaos Monkey. The main benefit is that it works with containers instead of VMs. It can kill, stop, restart running Docker containers or pause processes within specified containers. We use it for resilience testing of our distributed applications.

No setup necessary for Rails and Rack application. Works out of the box.;Intuitive API which mimics the language an actual user would use.;Switch the backend your tests run against from fast headless mode to an actual browser with no changes to your tests.;Powerful synchronization features mean you never have to manually wait for asynchronous processes to complete.
Chaos injection with network emulation; simulate network delay and packet loss; delay of all outgoing packets; delay with a range of specific containers via regex; delay with range and 'normal' distribution for random containers for a set period; simulate packet loss; loss using Bernoulli model, loss-state (2,3,4) Markov models; loss using Gilbert-Elliot model
Statistics
Stacks
858
Stacks
4
Followers
191
Followers
10
Votes
15
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 12
    Best acceptance test framework for Ruby on Rails apps
  • 2
    Synchronous with Rack::Test
  • 1
    Fast with Rack::Test
Cons
  • 1
    Hard to make reproducible tests when using with browser
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Rails
Rails
Docker
Docker
Golang
Golang
Kubernetes
Kubernetes

What are some alternatives to Capybara, Pumba?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Codeception

Codeception

Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana