StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. CAST.AI vs Moby

CAST.AI vs Moby

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Moby
Moby
Stacks38
Followers57
Votes0
GitHub Stars71.0K
Forks18.8K
CAST.AI
CAST.AI
Stacks4
Followers8
Votes19

CAST.AI vs Moby: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Deployment Flexibility**: CAST.AI allows users to deploy and manage applications across multiple cloud providers, offering flexibility in choosing the best cloud services for specific needs. In contrast, Moby primarily focuses on container runtime and orchestrator projects without the same level of multi-cloud support.

2. **Platform Integration**: CAST.AI offers a more integrated platform for managing cloud resources, providing a centralized dashboard for monitoring and controlling deployments on various cloud providers. On the other hand, Moby is more focused on building a modular ecosystem for container development and deployment, with less emphasis on centralized management.

3. **Cost Optimization**: CAST.AI includes features for optimizing costs by intelligently selecting the most cost-effective cloud services based on workload requirements and pricing models. In comparison, Moby does not have built-in tools for cost optimization and relies on the user's expertise in choosing efficient cloud resources.

4. **Control Plane Configuration**: CAST.AI abstracts the complexity of configuring the control plane for managing multi-cloud deployments, making it easier for users to set up and control their cloud infrastructure. In contrast, Moby requires more manual configuration and setup of the control plane components, resulting in a higher learning curve for users.

5. **Service Level Agreements (SLAs)**: CAST.AI provides SLAs for uptime and performance across multiple cloud providers, ensuring a certain level of service reliability for users. Conversely, Moby does not offer SLAs for its open-source projects, leaving users to rely on community support and self-management for maintenance and issue resolution.

6. **Machine Learning Capabilities**: CAST.AI incorporates machine learning algorithms to optimize cloud resource allocation and automate scaling decisions based on workload patterns, providing advanced intelligence for managing deployments. In contrast, Moby focuses on container development and management without as much emphasis on machine learning integration.

In Summary, CAST.AI offers deployment flexibility, platform integration, cost optimization, simplified control plane configuration, SLAs, and machine learning capabilities, while Moby primarily focuses on container-related projects without the same level of multi-cloud management features and intelligent automation.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Moby
Moby
CAST.AI
CAST.AI

Moby is a project which provides a “Lego set” of dozens of components, the framework for assembling them into custom container-based systems, and a place for all container enthusiasts to experiment and exchange ideas. Docker the product will be assembled from components that are packaged by the Moby project.

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

Orchestration; Image Management; Secret Management; Configuration Management; Networking; Provisioning
AI instance optimization; Intelligent autoscaling; Spot instance automation; Optimize productivity; Routine task automation
Statistics
GitHub Stars
71.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
18.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
38
Stacks
4
Followers
57
Followers
8
Votes
0
Votes
19
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 4
    Easy to start
  • 4
    Eks cost optmization
  • 3
    Outage prevention via multicloud
  • 3
    Aws cost optimization
  • 3
    Eks analyzer
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes

What are some alternatives to Moby, CAST.AI?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Amazon CloudWatch

Amazon CloudWatch

It helps you gain system-wide visibility into resource utilization, application performance, and operational health. It retrieve your monitoring data, view graphs to help take automated action based on the state of your cloud environment.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Stackdriver

Stackdriver

Google Stackdriver provides powerful monitoring, logging, and diagnostics. It equips you with insight into the health, performance, and availability of cloud-powered applications, enabling you to find and fix issues faster.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

Lumigo

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana