StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Checkstyle vs Psalm

Checkstyle vs Psalm

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Checkstyle
Checkstyle
Stacks132
Followers107
Votes0
GitHub Stars8.7K
Forks3.9K
Psalm
Psalm
Stacks22
Followers25
Votes0
GitHub Stars5.8K
Forks681

Checkstyle vs Psalm: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Checkstyle and Psalm are both static analysis tools used for code quality and bug detection in software development projects. While they serve a similar purpose, there are some key differences between the two tools that set them apart.

1. Checkstyle vs. Psalm: IDE Integration Checkstyle is primarily used for Java and can be integrated with various Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) such as Eclipse, IntelliJ IDEA, and NetBeans. On the other hand, Psalm is a tool specific to PHP and lacks direct IDE integration like Checkstyle, making it less convenient for developers who heavily rely on their IDE's functionality.

2. Checkstyle vs. Psalm: Supported Languages As mentioned earlier, Checkstyle is predominantly used with Java projects, whereas Psalm is solely focused on PHP codebases. While Checkstyle offers support for writing custom checks using Java, Psalm provides a comprehensive set of checks specifically designed for PHP projects, enabling more targeted and language-specific analysis.

3. Checkstyle vs. Psalm: Rule Configuration Checkstyle offers a highly customizable rule configuration, allowing developers to enable or disable specific checks, define custom checks, and tweak the parameters for existing rules. In contrast, Psalm provides a set of pre-defined rules that cannot be easily modified. This lack of flexibility in rule configuration may be limiting for developers who prefer fine-grained control over the analysis process.

4. Checkstyle vs. Psalm: Type Inference One of the significant differences between Checkstyle and Psalm lies in their approach to type inference. Checkstyle mainly focuses on coding style conventions and static code analysis, without advanced type inference capabilities. In contrast, Psalm leverages static type checking and inference to detect type-related errors and provide more comprehensive analysis, giving developers insights into potential type mismatches and other related issues.

5. Checkstyle vs. Psalm: Community Support Checkstyle has been around for a longer time and has gained significant community support over the years. It has a large user base, extensive online documentation, and active development, making it a popular choice for Java developers. Psalm, being relatively newer, has a smaller user base and a relatively smaller community compared to Checkstyle. While it is actively maintained, the level of community support and available resources may be more limited.

6. Checkstyle vs. Psalm: Error Reporting Checkstyle provides extensive error reporting during the analysis process, including detailed messages and line numbers for each identified issue. This helps developers pinpoint the exact location of the problem and take appropriate action. In contrast, Psalm focuses more on providing type-related error messages, which may not be as detailed or explicitly linked to the line of code where the issue occurs.

In summary, Checkstyle and Psalm are both valuable tools for static code analysis and code quality improvement. However, Checkstyle has wider IDE integration options, supports multiple languages with customization flexibility, and benefits from a larger community. Psalm, on the other hand, specializes in PHP, offers more advanced type inference, and provides focused analysis for PHP-specific codebases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Checkstyle
Checkstyle
Psalm
Psalm

It is a development tool to help programmers write Java code that adheres to a coding standard. It automates the process of checking Java code to spare humans of this boring (but important) task. This makes it ideal for projects that want to enforce a coding standard.

It is a type-checking static analysis tool for PHP that finds bugs humans can miss, and improves code quality. It is designed to be useful on both large legacy codebases and small, modern ones. It can help you prevent the vast majority of type-related runtime errors, and also enables you to take advantage of safe coding patterns popular in other languages.

-
Open-source; Static analysis tool; Identify both obvious and hard-to-spot bugs in your code; Can automatically fix a number of the errors it finds
Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.7K
GitHub Stars
5.8K
GitHub Forks
3.9K
GitHub Forks
681
Stacks
132
Stacks
22
Followers
107
Followers
25
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
Java
Java
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to Checkstyle , Psalm?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana