StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Citrix Gateway vs FortiAuthenticator

Citrix Gateway vs FortiAuthenticator

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Citrix Gateway
Citrix Gateway
Stacks16
Followers16
Votes0
FortiAuthenticator
FortiAuthenticator
Stacks4
Followers11
Votes0

Citrix Gateway vs FortiAuthenticator: What are the differences?

## Introduction
This markdown provides key differences between Citrix Gateway and FortiAuthenticator.

1. **Deployment Options**: Citrix Gateway offers both on-premises and cloud deployment options, allowing organizations to choose based on their specific needs. FortiAuthenticator, on the other hand, primarily focuses on on-premises deployment, providing a solution for organizations looking for a secure authentication platform within their own infrastructure.

2. **Integration Capabilities**: Citrix Gateway integrates seamlessly with Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops as well as other Citrix solutions, offering a holistic approach to secure remote access. FortiAuthenticator, however, is more focused on integrating with Fortinet's security ecosystem, providing enhanced compatibility with FortiGate and other Fortinet products.

3. **Authentication Methods**: While both Citrix Gateway and FortiAuthenticator offer support for multiple authentication methods such as tokens, biometrics, and smart cards, Citrix Gateway places a stronger emphasis on adaptive authentication, enabling more dynamic and context-aware authentication decisions based on user behavior and risk factors.

4. **Management and Monitoring Features**: Citrix Gateway provides comprehensive management and monitoring features through its centralized management console, allowing administrators to easily configure policies, monitor traffic, and generate reports. FortiAuthenticator also offers management and monitoring capabilities, but may require additional configuration and integration with other Fortinet solutions for a similar level of functionality.

5. **Scalability and Performance**: Citrix Gateway is known for its scalability, able to handle high volumes of traffic and users with minimal performance impact. FortiAuthenticator, while capable of scaling to meet the needs of medium to large enterprises, may require additional hardware or configurations to achieve the same level of performance as Citrix Gateway in high-demand environments.

6. **Licensing and Pricing Structure**: Citrix Gateway's licensing and pricing structure may vary depending on the deployment option and features required, offering flexibility for organizations with diverse needs. FortiAuthenticator, on the other hand, typically follows a more straightforward licensing model, with potentially fewer options for customization but simpler pricing arrangements.

In Summary, the key differences between Citrix Gateway and FortiAuthenticator lie in their deployment options, integration capabilities, authentication methods, management features, scalability, and licensing structures.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Citrix Gateway
Citrix Gateway
FortiAuthenticator
FortiAuthenticator

It is a customer-managed solution that can be deployed on premises or on any public cloud, such as AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud Platform. It provides users with secure access and single sign-on to all the virtual, SaaS and web applications they need to be productive.

It provides services which are key in creating effective security policy, strengthening security by ensuring only the right person at the right time can access your sensitive networks and data.

Customer-managed solution; Can be deployed on premises or on any public cloud; Secure access and single sign-on
Ability to transparently identify network users and enforce identity-driven policy on a Fortinet-enabled enterprise network; Seamless secure two-factor/OTP authentication across the organization in conjunction with FortiToken; Certificate management for enterprise wireless and VPN deployment; Guest management for wired and wireless network security; Single Sign On capabilities for both internal and cloud networks
Statistics
Stacks
16
Stacks
4
Followers
16
Followers
11
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Google Cloud Platform
Google Cloud Platform
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Citrix Gateway, FortiAuthenticator?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope