Codeception vs Karate DSL

Overview

Codeception

Stacks155

Followers111

Votes5

Karate DSL

Stacks148

Followers268

Votes85

Codeception vs Karate DSL: What are the differences?

Installation and Configurations: Codeception requires installation of multiple dependencies such as PHP and Composer, and it also requires manual configuration for various settings. On the other hand, Karate DSL is built on Java, so it requires installation of Java Runtime Environment (JRE) but it does not require any additional configurations.
Syntax and Language Support: Codeception uses PHP as its primary language, which might be familiar to developers with PHP background. On the other hand, Karate DSL uses a more human-readable language called Gherkin, which allows non-technical users to understand and write tests easily.
Built-in Features and Libraries: Codeception provides various built-in features and libraries for testing web applications, such as database and email testing. Karate DSL, on the other hand, focuses more on API testing and provides built-in features for making HTTP requests, validating responses, and handling JSON/XML data.
Integration with Other Tools: Codeception integrates well with popular testing frameworks and libraries such as PHPUnit, Selenium WebDriver, and Symfony. Karate DSL also integrates well with other tools and frameworks such as Cucumber, JUnit, and Maven, making it suitable for Java-based projects.
Parallel Execution: Codeception supports parallel execution of tests, which can help in reducing overall testing time for large test suites. Karate DSL, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for parallel execution but it can be achieved using external tools or scripts.
Community Support and Documentation: Codeception has a large and active community, which means there are plenty of resources, tutorials, and forums available for assistance. Karate DSL, being a relatively newer tool, has a smaller community but still provides good documentation and support.

In Summary, Codeception and Karate DSL differ in terms of installation and configurations, syntax and language support, built-in features and libraries, integration with other tools, support for parallel execution, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Codeception	Karate DSL
Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.	Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.
-	Native support for both JSON and XML; Powerful payload assertions with "deep-equals"; Data-driven testing; Easy even for non-programmers; Embedded JavaScript engine; Test-doubles or HTTP mocking built-in; Re-use test scripts as performance-tests; Environment switching; Comprehensive reports, supported by all CI tools
Statistics
Stacks 155	Stacks 148
Followers 111	Followers 268
Votes 5	Votes 85
Pros & Cons
Pros 4 Easy to get up and running some simple tests	Pros 11 Easy CI integration via cross-platform executable / CLI 9 Simple and meaningful asserts for large responses 9 Easy for even non-programmers to get started 7 Data-driven tests that can even use JSON or CSV sources 5 Comprehensive documentation and examples Cons 1 Ode support becomes very time consuming and expensive b 1 Confusing report: Summarized by steps and not by featur 1 Complex folder structure, without a defined pattern 1 Karate uses its own scripting language 1 There is no IntelliSense support in IDE
Integrations
No integrations available	JavaScript Visual Studio Code Java Cucumber IntelliJ IDEA JUnit Eclipse

What are some alternatives to Codeception, Karate DSL?

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Related Comparisons

Codeception vs Karate DSL: What are the differences?

Installation and Configurations: Codeception requires installation of multiple dependencies such as PHP and Composer, and it also requires manual configuration for various settings. On the other hand, Karate DSL is built on Java, so it requires installation of Java Runtime Environment (JRE) but it does not require any additional configurations.
Syntax and Language Support: Codeception uses PHP as its primary language, which might be familiar to developers with PHP background. On the other hand, Karate DSL uses a more human-readable language called Gherkin, which allows non-technical users to understand and write tests easily.
Built-in Features and Libraries: Codeception provides various built-in features and libraries for testing web applications, such as database and email testing. Karate DSL, on the other hand, focuses more on API testing and provides built-in features for making HTTP requests, validating responses, and handling JSON/XML data.
Integration with Other Tools: Codeception integrates well with popular testing frameworks and libraries such as PHPUnit, Selenium WebDriver, and Symfony. Karate DSL also integrates well with other tools and frameworks such as Cucumber, JUnit, and Maven, making it suitable for Java-based projects.
Parallel Execution: Codeception supports parallel execution of tests, which can help in reducing overall testing time for large test suites. Karate DSL, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for parallel execution but it can be achieved using external tools or scripts.
Community Support and Documentation: Codeception has a large and active community, which means there are plenty of resources, tutorials, and forums available for assistance. Karate DSL, being a relatively newer tool, has a smaller community but still provides good documentation and support.

Codeception vs Karate DSL

Overview