StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Javascript Testing Framework
  5. CodeceptJS vs Jasmine

CodeceptJS vs Jasmine

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jasmine
Jasmine
Stacks4.8K
Followers1.5K
Votes187
CodeceptJS
CodeceptJS
Stacks117
Followers217
Votes52

CodeceptJS vs Jasmine: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the world of automated testing, CodeceptJS and Jasmine are two popular testing frameworks used by developers globally. While both are effective in their own ways, there are key differences that set them apart from each other.

  1. Syntax: CodeceptJS utilizes a clear and concise syntax that makes it beginner-friendly and easy to understand. On the other hand, Jasmine's syntax can be more verbose and complex, requiring a deeper understanding of how it operates.

  2. Support for BDD/TDD: CodeceptJS primarily supports Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) style of testing, providing a high-level approach to test structure. In contrast, Jasmine is designed with a focus on Test-Driven Development (TDD) principles, emphasizing smaller, more granular tests.

  3. Built-in features: CodeceptJS comes with built-in features such as data-driven testing, scenario-driven testing, and page object model support, making it a comprehensive testing solution out of the box. Jasmine, while powerful, may require additional plugins or extensions to achieve similar functionality.

  4. Asynchronous Testing: CodeceptJS simplifies asynchronous testing by handling promises and async/await functions seamlessly, reducing the complexity of dealing with asynchronous code. Jasmine requires adding custom scripts or libraries to handle asynchronous operations efficiently.

  5. Community and Documentation: CodeceptJS has a growing community and extensive documentation, providing ample resources for newcomers and experienced users alike. Jasmine, being a well-established framework, also has a strong community but may lack the same level of beginner-friendly documentation as CodeceptJS.

In Summary, CodeceptJS and Jasmine differ in syntax simplicity, support for BDD/TDD, built-in features, handling of asynchronous testing, and community/documentation accessibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jasmine, CodeceptJS

Abigail
Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

We use Mocha for our FDA verification testing. It's integrated into Meteor, our upstream web application framework. We like how battle tested it is, its' syntax, its' options of reporters, and countless other features. Most everybody can agree on mocha, and that gets us half-way through our FDA verification and validation (V&V) testing strategy.

231k views231k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jasmine
Jasmine
CodeceptJS
CodeceptJS

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.

-
Behavior Driven Development; Acceptance Testing; Data Driven Tests
Statistics
Stacks
4.8K
Stacks
117
Followers
1.5K
Followers
217
Votes
187
Votes
52
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 64
    Can also be used for tdd
  • 49
    Open source
  • 19
    Originally from RSpec
  • 15
    Great community
  • 14
    No dependencies, not even DOM
Cons
  • 2
    Unfriendly error logs
Pros
  • 10
    Readability
  • 9
    Full browser control
  • 9
    Cross browser support
  • 8
    Open source
  • 6
    Community
Cons
  • 2
    Small community
  • 1
    Not a framework by itself
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript
SilverStripe
SilverStripe
Wallaby.js
Wallaby.js
MockIt (open source)
MockIt (open source)
Glamorous
Glamorous
Majestic GUI
Majestic GUI

What are some alternatives to Jasmine, CodeceptJS?

Mocha

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

Jest

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Cypress

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

Protractor

Protractor

Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.

AVA

AVA

Even though JavaScript is single-threaded, IO in Node.js can happen in parallel due to its async nature. AVA takes advantage of this and runs your tests concurrently, which is especially beneficial for IO heavy tests. In addition, test files are run in parallel as separate processes, giving you even better performance and an isolated environment for each test file.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

QUnit

QUnit

QUnit is a powerful, easy-to-use JavaScript unit testing framework. It's used by the jQuery, jQuery UI and jQuery Mobile projects and is capable of testing any generic JavaScript code, including itself!

Sorry-cypress

Sorry-cypress

Open-source, self-hosted alternative Cypress Dashboard.

Baretest

Baretest

It is a fast and simple JavaScript test runner. It offers near-instant performance and a brainless API. It makes testing tolerable.

SinonJS

SinonJS

It is a really helpful library when you want to unit test your code. It supports spies, stubs, and mocks. The library has cross browser support and also can run on the server using Node.js.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana