StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Contiv vs Docker Hub

Contiv vs Docker Hub

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Docker Hub
Docker Hub
Stacks224
Followers262
Votes7
Contiv
Contiv
Stacks7
Followers9
Votes0
GitHub Stars518
Forks181

Contiv vs Docker Hub: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of containerization and cloud-native applications, Contiv and Docker Hub are two popular platforms that offer different functionalities and services. Contiv is an open-source networking framework specifically designed for containerized applications, while Docker Hub is a cloud-based registry service that allows users to store and distribute container images. Understanding the key differences between these two platforms is crucial for developers and organizations to make informed decisions about their containerization strategy.

  1. Networking vs. Registry Service: The most fundamental difference between Contiv and Docker Hub lies in their primary functionalities. Contiv primarily focuses on providing a comprehensive networking solution for containerized applications. It offers features such as network isolation, policy enforcement, and multi-tenancy to enable secure and scalable communication between containers. On the other hand, Docker Hub serves as a registry service where developers can store, share, and distribute container images. It acts as a central repository for container images and facilitates easy deployment and version control.

  2. Open-Source vs. Cloud-Based: Another significant distinction between Contiv and Docker Hub is their underlying architecture. Contiv is built as an open-source networking solution, allowing users to access and contribute to the codebase. This promotes community involvement and enables customization and extension of the framework according to specific requirements. In contrast, Docker Hub is a cloud-based service provided by Docker Inc. It operates as a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) platform hosted on the cloud, relieving users from managing the infrastructure and maintenance aspects.

  3. Networking Abstraction vs. Image Distribution: Contiv, being a networking framework, provides a higher level of abstraction for networking functionalities in containerized environments. It offers software-defined networking (SDN) capabilities and virtualizes the network infrastructure, allowing developers to define and manage networking policies through a centralized controller. Docker Hub, on the other hand, focuses on the distribution of container images. It offers secure and efficient mechanisms for uploading, storing, and pulling container images, ensuring fast and reliable access to the required images during application deployment.

  4. Integration with Container Orchestration Platforms: When it comes to integrating with container orchestration platforms, Contiv and Docker Hub have different areas of focus. Contiv provides native integration with orchestration tools like Kubernetes, enabling seamless networking capabilities for containerized workloads. It simplifies the management of networking policies and ensures consistent network connectivity across the cluster. Docker Hub, on the other hand, acts as a compatible registry service for various container orchestration platforms, including Kubernetes, Docker Swarm, and Amazon ECS. It allows developers to pull images from Docker Hub during deployment, irrespective of the underlying orchestration tool.

  5. Advanced Networking Features vs. Image Management Features: Contiv stands out with its advanced networking features that address the specific requirements of containerized applications. It supports network segmentation, micro-segmentation, traffic isolation, and Quality of Service (QoS) for enhanced application performance and security. In contrast, Docker Hub emphasizes image management features. It enables versioning, tagging, and sharing of container images, making it easier for teams to collaborate and maintain a consistent image pipeline.

  6. Scalability and Performance Characteristics: When it comes to scalability and performance, both Contiv and Docker Hub have different considerations. Contiv's focus on networking allows it to scale seamlessly with the growing number of containers and workloads. Its SDN architecture ensures efficient traffic routing and load balancing, enhancing performance even in complex setups. Docker Hub, being a cloud-based service, leverages the infrastructure provided by Docker Inc., ensuring high availability and scalability for image distribution. It employs caching and content delivery mechanisms to optimize image retrieval and minimize latency.

In summary, Contiv primarily offers a comprehensive networking solution for containerized applications with advanced networking features, native integration with Kubernetes, and open-source extensibility. On the other hand, Docker Hub serves as a cloud-based registry service focusing on image distribution and management, enabling version control and easy collaboration among teams.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Docker Hub
Docker Hub
Contiv
Contiv

It is the world's easiest way to create, manage, and deliver your teams' container applications. It is the perfect home for your teams' applications.

It is a powerful, 100% open source networking solution for modern compute workloads. Integration and support for VM’s and Bare Metal allow you to provide a single network fabric across your infrastructure.

-
Rich Policy Framework; Multi-Platforms; Multi-Infrastructure; Networking Support
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
518
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
181
Stacks
224
Stacks
7
Followers
262
Followers
9
Votes
7
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Uses a very familiar collaboration model as GitHub, the
  • 1
    Allows users to set permissions to restrict access or s
  • 1
    Fairly inexpensive with usage based pricing
  • 1
    Security scanning available
  • 1
    Quickly creates organizations, add users or create grou
Cons
  • 1
    Lacks fine grain access control
  • 1
    Does not provide any insight into the registry usage
  • 1
    Lacks LDAP, SAML and OAuth support
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to Docker Hub, Contiv?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana