StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Coverity Scan vs ESLint

Coverity Scan vs ESLint

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Coverity Scan
Coverity Scan
Stacks50
Followers185
Votes0
ESLint
ESLint
Stacks38.6K
Followers14.0K
Votes28
GitHub Stars26.6K
Forks4.8K

Coverity Scan vs ESLint: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this markdown, the key differences between Coverity Scan and ESLint will be presented. Coverity Scan is a static analysis tool primarily used for finding defects in source code, while ESLint is a pluggable linting utility for JavaScript and JSX. It is important to note that the differences mentioned below are based on their core functionalities and features.

  1. Analysis Scope: Coverity Scan provides in-depth analysis for a wide range of programming languages, frameworks, and libraries, including C, C++, C#, Java, JavaScript, Python, and more. On the other hand, ESLint is specifically designed for JavaScript and JSX code linting, providing a vast array of configurable rules for code quality and formatting.

  2. Defect Detection: Coverity Scan excels in identifying complex and critical defects, such as memory leaks, concurrency issues, null pointer dereferences, and other security vulnerabilities, through its advanced static analysis techniques. ESLint, on the other hand, primarily focuses on minor coding conventions, potential bugs, and maintainability issues, helping developers write clean and consistent code.

  3. Integration: Coverity Scan is typically integrated into the continuous integration (CI) pipeline of software development projects, enabling automated code analysis as a part of the build process. With its extensive plugin ecosystem, ESLint can be seamlessly integrated into various code editors, IDEs, and build systems, allowing developers to receive real-time feedback during development.

  4. Configurability: Coverity Scan's analysis rules and configurations are pre-defined and updated by Coverity itself. Developers using Coverity Scan have limited control over modifying the analysis rules. On the contrary, ESLint provides high configurability, allowing developers to create their own linting rules, customize existing rules, and configure the severity level of each rule according to their project's requirements.

  5. Language Specificity: While Coverity Scan supports multiple programming languages, it doesn't provide language-specific rules and analysis for each language. It primarily focuses on cross-language defects. In contrast, ESLint is designed specifically for JavaScript and JSX, providing rules that are tailored to the nuances and best practices of the JavaScript language.

  6. Community Support: ESLint benefits from a large and active open-source community, which constantly contributes new rules, plugins, and bug fixes. The community-driven nature of ESLint fosters continuous improvement and ensures a more up-to-date set of rules that align with the latest JavaScript standards. Coverity Scan, being a proprietary tool, may have limited community support and updates compared to ESLint.

In Summary, Coverity Scan and ESLint differ in terms of their analysis scope, defect detection capabilities, integration options, configurability, language specificity, and community support. While Coverity Scan focuses on a broader range of languages and critical defect detection, ESLint specializes in JavaScript linting and emphasizes code quality and maintainability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Coverity Scan, ESLint

Carlos
Carlos

Mar 14, 2020

Needs adviceonPrettierPrettierESLintESLintgulpgulp

Scenario: I want to integrate Prettier in our code base which is currently using ESLint (for .js and .scss both). The project is using gulp.

It doesn't feel quite right to me to use ESLint, I wonder if it would be better to use Stylelint or Sass Lint instead.

I completed integrating ESLint + Prettier, Planning to do the same with [ Stylelint || Sasslint || EsLint] + Prettier.

And have gulp 'fix' on file save (Watcher).

Any recommendation is appreciated.

465k views465k
Comments
Alex
Alex

Software Engineer

Aug 7, 2020

Review

you don't actually have to choose between these tools as they have vastly different purposes. i think its more a matter of understanding how to use them.

while eslint and stylelint are used to notify you about code quality issues, to guide you to write better code, prettier automatically handles code formatting (without notifying me). nothing else.

prettier and eslint both officially discourage using the eslint-plugin-prettier way, as these tools actually do very different things. autofixing with linters on watch isnt a great idea either. auto-fixing should only be done intentionally. you're not alone though, as a lot of devs set this up wrong.

i encourage you to think about what problem you're trying to solve and configure accordingly.

for my teams i set it up like this:

  • eslint, stylelint, prettier locally installed for cli use and ide support
  • eslint config prettier (code formatting rules are not eslints business, so dont warn me about it)
  • vscode workspace config: format on save
  • separate npm scripts for linting, and formatting
  • precommit hooks (husky)

so you can easily integrate with gulp. its just js after all ;)

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Coverity Scan
Coverity Scan
ESLint
ESLint

Coverity's implementation of static analysis can follow all the possible paths of execution through source code (including interprocedurally) and find defects and vulnerabilities caused by the conjunction of statements that are not errors independent of each other.

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Test every line of code and potential execution path.;The root cause of each defect is clearly explained, making it easy to fix bugs;Integrates with GitHub and Travis CI
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
26.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
4.8K
Stacks
50
Stacks
38.6K
Followers
185
Followers
14.0K
Votes
0
Votes
28
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 8
    Consistent javascript - opinions don't matter anymore
  • 6
    Free
  • 6
    IDE Integration
  • 4
    Customizable
  • 2
    Focuses code review on quality not style
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
Travis CI
Travis CI
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Coverity Scan, ESLint?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana