Coverity Scan vs PMD

Overview

Coverity Scan

Stacks50

Followers185

Votes0

PMD

Stacks46

Followers111

Votes0

GitHub Stars5.2K

Forks1.5K

Coverity Scan vs PMD: What are the differences?

Static Analysis Tools: Coverity Scan is a static analysis tool that focuses on detecting defects in C, C++, and Java code, whereas PMD is primarily used for analyzing Java and Apex code for potential issues and errors.
Customization Options: Coverity Scan provides extensive customization options for rule configurations and severity levels, allowing users to fine-tune the analysis process to suit their specific needs. On the other hand, PMD offers a more streamlined approach with predefined rules and limited customization capabilities.
Integration Capabilities: Coverity Scan integrates seamlessly with popular development tools and continuous integration pipelines, enabling automatic code analysis as part of the build process. PMD also offers integrations, but they are not as robust and comprehensive as Coverity Scan's.
Scope of Analysis: Coverity Scan offers a broader scope of analysis, covering a wide range of potential defects such as buffer overflows, memory leaks, and concurrency issues. In contrast, PMD focuses more on code style violations, performance optimizations, and potential bugs in Java and Apex code.
User Interface: Coverity Scan provides a user-friendly interface with detailed reports, actionable insights, and interactive dashboards for tracking and managing defects. PMD, on the other hand, offers a more simplistic interface that may require additional tools or setups for deeper analysis and reporting.
Community Support: Coverity Scan has a strong community of developers and contributors who actively support and maintain the tool, providing ongoing updates and enhancements. PMD also has a supportive community but may not have the same level of resources and frequent updates as Coverity Scan.

In Summary, Coverity Scan and PMD differ in their focus on static analysis, customization options, integration capabilities, scope of analysis, user interface, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Coverity Scan	PMD
Coverity's implementation of static analysis can follow all the possible paths of execution through source code (including interprocedurally) and find defects and vulnerabilities caused by the conjunction of statements that are not errors independent of each other.	It is a source code analyzer. It finds common programming flaws like unused variables, empty catch blocks, unnecessary object creation, and so forth. It includes CPD, the copy-paste-detector.
Test every line of code and potential execution path.;The root cause of each defect is clearly explained, making it easy to fix bugs;Integrates with GitHub and Travis CI	supports multiple languages; enforce a coding standard for your codebase; built-in checks
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 5.2K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 1.5K
Stacks 50	Stacks 46
Followers 185	Followers 111
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
GitHub Travis CI	Gradle Windows Java Linux macOS

What are some alternatives to Coverity Scan, PMD?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

Coverity Scan vs PMD: What are the differences?

Static Analysis Tools: Coverity Scan is a static analysis tool that focuses on detecting defects in C, C++, and Java code, whereas PMD is primarily used for analyzing Java and Apex code for potential issues and errors.
Customization Options: Coverity Scan provides extensive customization options for rule configurations and severity levels, allowing users to fine-tune the analysis process to suit their specific needs. On the other hand, PMD offers a more streamlined approach with predefined rules and limited customization capabilities.
Integration Capabilities: Coverity Scan integrates seamlessly with popular development tools and continuous integration pipelines, enabling automatic code analysis as part of the build process. PMD also offers integrations, but they are not as robust and comprehensive as Coverity Scan's.
Scope of Analysis: Coverity Scan offers a broader scope of analysis, covering a wide range of potential defects such as buffer overflows, memory leaks, and concurrency issues. In contrast, PMD focuses more on code style violations, performance optimizations, and potential bugs in Java and Apex code.
User Interface: Coverity Scan provides a user-friendly interface with detailed reports, actionable insights, and interactive dashboards for tracking and managing defects. PMD, on the other hand, offers a more simplistic interface that may require additional tools or setups for deeper analysis and reporting.
Community Support: Coverity Scan has a strong community of developers and contributors who actively support and maintain the tool, providing ongoing updates and enhancements. PMD also has a supportive community but may not have the same level of resources and frequent updates as Coverity Scan.

In Summary, Coverity Scan and PMD differ in their focus on static analysis, customization options, integration capabilities, scope of analysis, user interface, and community support.

Coverity Scan vs PMD

Overview