Credo vs Scrutinizer

Overview

Scrutinizer

Stacks94

Followers64

Votes20

Credo

Stacks28

Followers12

Votes0

GitHub Stars5.1K

Forks434

Credo vs Scrutinizer: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the world of code quality analysis tools, Credo and Scrutinizer are two popular options that help developers improve their code. Understanding the key differences between these two tools can aid developers in making an informed decision on which tool best fits their needs.

Language Support: Credo is specifically designed for Elixir, while Scrutinizer supports multiple languages such as PHP, Python, and Ruby, making it a more versatile option for developers working across different tech stacks.
Installation and Integration: Credo is typically installed as a mix dependency in an Elixir project, whereas Scrutinizer can integrate with popular version control systems like GitHub and Bitbucket, providing a seamless setup process for developers.
Analysis Depth: Credo specializes in static code analysis and focuses on enforcing coding conventions, while Scrutinizer provides a more comprehensive analysis by also offering dynamic code analysis, code coverage metrics, and security vulnerability detection.
Pricing Model: Credo is an open-source tool, freely available for all developers to use, while Scrutinizer offers a variety of pricing plans based on the size of the project and the level of support needed, making it a more scalable solution for larger teams.
Customization and Extensibility: Credo provides a set of predefined rules that cannot be modified, whereas Scrutinizer allows users to create custom rules and plugins, enabling more tailored code analysis for specific project requirements.
Community and Support: Credo has a growing community of Elixir developers contributing to its development and support, while Scrutinizer has a dedicated support team and a larger user base across different programming languages, providing more extensive documentation and resources for users.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Credo and Scrutinizer, such as language support, analysis depth, pricing models, and customization options, can help developers choose the right code quality analysis tool for their specific needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Scrutinizer	Credo
Scrutinizer is a continuous inspection platform helping you to create better software.	credo can show you refactoring opportunities in your code, complex and duplicated code fragments, warn you about common mistakes, show inconsistencies in your naming scheme and - if needed - help you enforce a desired coding style.
Continuously measure and track your code quality;Project quality broken down;Know your problem areas;Works fine with legacy code bases	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 5.1K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 434
Stacks 94	Stacks 28
Followers 64	Followers 12
Votes 20	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 7 Github integration / sync 4 Bitbucket integration / sync 2 Gitlab integration / sync 2 Private Git repo sync 1 Python inspection Cons 1 Pricing	No community feedback yet
Integrations
GitHub Bitbucket	Golang

What are some alternatives to Scrutinizer, Credo?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

Credo vs Scrutinizer: What are the differences?

Language Support: Credo is specifically designed for Elixir, while Scrutinizer supports multiple languages such as PHP, Python, and Ruby, making it a more versatile option for developers working across different tech stacks.
Installation and Integration: Credo is typically installed as a mix dependency in an Elixir project, whereas Scrutinizer can integrate with popular version control systems like GitHub and Bitbucket, providing a seamless setup process for developers.
Analysis Depth: Credo specializes in static code analysis and focuses on enforcing coding conventions, while Scrutinizer provides a more comprehensive analysis by also offering dynamic code analysis, code coverage metrics, and security vulnerability detection.
Pricing Model: Credo is an open-source tool, freely available for all developers to use, while Scrutinizer offers a variety of pricing plans based on the size of the project and the level of support needed, making it a more scalable solution for larger teams.
Customization and Extensibility: Credo provides a set of predefined rules that cannot be modified, whereas Scrutinizer allows users to create custom rules and plugins, enabling more tailored code analysis for specific project requirements.
Community and Support: Credo has a growing community of Elixir developers contributing to its development and support, while Scrutinizer has a dedicated support team and a larger user base across different programming languages, providing more extensive documentation and resources for users.

Credo vs Scrutinizer

Overview