1. Deployment and Implementation: CrowdStrike is a cloud-based endpoint security platform that offers instant deployment and scalability, while Snort is an open-source network intrusion detection system that requires installation on physical hardware or virtual machines.

2. Detection Methodology: CrowdStrike utilizes machine learning and behavioral analysis to identify and prevent threats in real-time, whereas Snort relies on signature-based detection to identify known threats using predefined rules.

3. Platform Compatibility: CrowdStrike is compatible with multiple operating systems like Windows, macOS, and Linux, while Snort is primarily designed for Unix-based systems.

4. Management and Reporting: CrowdStrike provides a centralized dashboard for real-time monitoring, incident response, and threat intelligence, whereas Snort requires additional tools for comprehensive management and reporting capabilities.

5. Cost and Licensing: CrowdStrike operates on a subscription-based model with pricing tiers based on the number of endpoints, while Snort is open-source and free to use but may incur costs for support and additional features.

6. Scalability and Performance: CrowdStrike offers scalability for large enterprises with a high volume of endpoints, providing consistent performance, whereas Snort may experience performance issues when handling a large amount of network traffic.

In Summary, CrowdStrike and Snort differ significantly in deployment, detection methodology, platform compatibility, management capabilities, cost structure, and scalability.