StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Cucumber vs TestComplete

Cucumber vs TestComplete

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Cucumber
Cucumber
Stacks1.4K
Followers927
Votes36
TestComplete
TestComplete
Stacks39
Followers60
Votes0

Cucumber vs TestComplete: What are the differences?

Introduction

Cucumber and TestComplete are both popular testing tools, but they differ in several key aspects. This Markdown code will present a comparison between Cucumber and TestComplete, highlighting their main differences.

  1. Test Language and Approach: Cucumber: Cucumber is a behavior-driven development (BDD) tool that uses the Gherkin language, which is plain English text with keywords like Given, When, and Then. It focuses on collaboration between technical and non-technical team members. TestComplete: TestComplete supports multiple programming languages, such as JavaScript, VBScript, and Python. It follows a traditional approach to testing, where test scripts are written using the programming language supported by the tool. There is less emphasis on collaboration and more on technical expertise.

  2. Automation Capabilities: Cucumber: Cucumber is primarily used for acceptance testing and behavior-driven development. It excels in testing user actions and interactions with the system. It provides a framework for test automation, but the automation layer needs to be implemented separately. TestComplete: TestComplete is a comprehensive automated testing tool that supports various types of testing, including functional, regression, and load testing. It offers built-in automation capabilities, making it easier to create and execute automated test scripts.

  3. Integration with Development Process: Cucumber: Cucumber is highly integrated with agile software development methodologies. It promotes cross-functional collaboration and can be seamlessly integrated into continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipelines. Its Gherkin syntax allows for better communication between developers, testers, and other stakeholders. TestComplete: TestComplete can be integrated into the development process, but it is not specifically designed for agile methodologies like Cucumber. It can be used in a variety of development environments and can be integrated with various testing frameworks and tools.

  4. Reporting and Documentation: Cucumber: Cucumber provides detailed and structured test reports, making it easier to understand the test results. It offers various reporting formats, such as HTML, JSON, and XML, allowing for easy integration with other tools and systems. Additionally, Cucumber generates living documentation that serves as up-to-date test documentation for the system. TestComplete: TestComplete also offers comprehensive test reports, but they are more focused on technical details and metrics. It provides graphs, charts, and logs to analyze test results. TestComplete does not generate living documentation like Cucumber, but it provides extensive documentation for the tool itself.

  5. Tool Cost and Licensing: Cucumber: Cucumber is an open-source tool that is free to use. It does not require any licensing fees and has an active community that contributes to its development and maintenance. TestComplete: TestComplete is a commercial tool that requires a license for usage. It offers different pricing options based on the number of users and the type of license required. The cost of TestComplete can vary depending on the organization's needs and budget.

  6. Supported Platforms: Cucumber: Cucumber can be used for testing applications on multiple platforms, including web, mobile, and desktop. It supports multiple programming languages and can be used with different testing frameworks. TestComplete: TestComplete is primarily designed for testing desktop, web, and mobile applications. It supports various platforms, including Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, and web browsers. It provides features specific to each platform, such as object recognition for desktop applications.

In summary, Cucumber focuses on behavior-driven development, collaboration, and integration with agile methodologies, while TestComplete provides comprehensive test automation capabilities, extensive reporting, and support for various platforms. Cucumber is open-source and free, while TestComplete is a commercial tool with licensing costs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Cucumber
Cucumber
TestComplete
TestComplete

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

It is an automated UI testing tool that makes it fast and easy to create, maintain, and execute functional tests across desktop, web, and mobile applications. With TestComplete, you can increase test coverage and ensure you ship high-quality, battle-tested software

-
Building Automated UI Tests; Object Recognition Engine now with Artificial Intelligence; HTML5 Test Automation; Data-Driven Testing; Automated Test Reporting & Analysis
Statistics
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
39
Followers
927
Followers
60
Votes
36
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 20
    Simple Syntax
  • 8
    Simple usage
  • 5
    Huge community
  • 3
    Nice report
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Jenkins
Jenkins
Git
Git
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Jira
Jira
Bugzilla
Bugzilla

What are some alternatives to Cucumber, TestComplete?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana