Alternatives to D logo

Alternatives to D

D3.js, Pathfinder, C, JavaScript, and Python are the most popular alternatives and competitors to D.
102
112
+ 1
145

What is D and what are its top alternatives?

D is a language with C-like syntax and static typing. It pragmatically combines efficiency, control, and modeling power, with safety and programmer productivity.
D is a tool in the Languages category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to D

  • D3.js

    D3.js

    It is a JavaScript library for manipulating documents based on data. Emphasises on web standards gives you the full capabilities of modern browsers without tying yourself to a proprietary framework. ...

  • Pathfinder

    Pathfinder

    Pathfinder is a new real-time routing service in public beta. Pathfinder calculates routes for transportation services. These routes are updated in real time as users make transportation or delivery requests. Through our SDKs, applications can subscribe to routes as they change in response to user requests. ...

  • C

    C

  • JavaScript

    JavaScript

    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. ...

  • Python

    Python

    Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best. ...

  • PHP

    PHP

    Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world. ...

  • HTML5

    HTML5

    HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997. ...

  • Java

    Java

    Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere! ...

D alternatives & related posts

D3.js logo

D3.js

1.6K
1.5K
627
A JavaScript visualization library for HTML and SVG
1.6K
1.5K
+ 1
627
PROS OF D3.JS
  • 182
    Beautiful visualizations
  • 97
    Svg
  • 91
    Data-driven
  • 80
    Large set of examples
  • 60
    Data-driven documents
  • 23
    Visualization components
  • 20
    Transitions
  • 18
    Dynamic properties
  • 14
    Plugins
  • 11
    Transformation
  • 6
    Makes data interactive
  • 4
    Components
  • 4
    Enter and Exit
  • 3
    Open Source
  • 3
    Exhaustive
  • 3
    Backed by the new york times
  • 2
    Kris
  • 2
    Easy and beautiful
  • 1
    Angular 4
  • 1
    Simple elegance
  • 1
    Templates, force template
  • 1
    Awesome Community Support
CONS OF D3.JS
  • 6
    Beginners cant understand at all
  • 5
    Complex syntax

related D3.js posts

Tim Abbott
Shared insights
on
Plotly.jsPlotly.jsD3.jsD3.js
at

We use Plotly (just their open source stuff) for Zulip's user-facing and admin-facing statistics graphs because it's a reasonably well-designed JavaScript graphing library.

If you've tried using D3.js, it's a pretty poor developer experience, and that translates to spending a bunch of time getting the graphs one wants even for things that are conceptually pretty basic. Plotly isn't amazing (it's decent), but it's way better than than D3 unless you have very specialized needs.

See more

I'm a student, and I have a project to build an application (Visual analytics tool) that takes a Microsoft Excel file, cleans the data, and visualizes it. Also, the app should allow the user to filter and interact with it.

1- should I make it desktop application or web application? : I'm leaning toward (desktop)

2- D3.js OR Python?

3- better excel or CSV?

I'm a beginner Inspiration for interaction and look of the app: eventflow application.

See more
Pathfinder logo

Pathfinder

11
23
0
Routing as a service
11
23
+ 1
0
PROS OF PATHFINDER
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF PATHFINDER
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Pathfinder posts

      C logo

      C

      6K
      4K
      236
      One of the most widely used programming languages of all time
      6K
      4K
      + 1
      236
      PROS OF C
      • 66
        Performance
      • 47
        Low-level
      • 34
        Portability
      • 28
        Hardware level
      • 18
        Embedded apps
      • 12
        Pure
      • 9
        Performance of assembler
      • 7
        Ubiquity
      • 4
        Great for embedded
      • 4
        Old
      • 3
        Compiles quickly
      • 2
        OpenMP
      • 2
        No garbage collection to slow it down
      CONS OF C
      • 5
        Low-level
      • 3
        No built in support for concurrency
      • 2
        Lack of type safety
      • 2
        No built in support for parallelism (e.g. map-reduce)

      related C posts

      Conor Myhrvold
      Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 15 upvotes · 1.1M views

      Why Uber developed H3, our open source grid system to make geospatial data visualization and exploration easier and more efficient:

      We decided to create H3 to combine the benefits of a hexagonal global grid system with a hierarchical indexing system. A global grid system usually requires at least two things: a map projection and a grid laid on top of the map. For map projection, we chose to use gnomonic projections centered on icosahedron faces. This projects from Earth as a sphere to an icosahedron, a twenty-sided platonic solid. The H3 grid is constructed by laying out 122 base cells over the Earth, with ten cells per face. H3 supports sixteen resolutions: https://eng.uber.com/h3/

      (GitHub Pages : https://uber.github.io/h3/#/ Written in C w/ bindings in Java & JavaScript )

      See more
      Shared insights
      on
      GoGoCCPythonPythonRustRust
      at

      One important decision for delivering a platform independent solution with low memory footprint and minimal dependencies was the choice of the programming language. We considered a few from Python (there was already a reasonably large Python code base at Thumbtack), to Go (we were taking our first steps with it), and even Rust (too immature at the time).

      We ended up writing it in C. It was easy to meet all requirements with only one external dependency for implementing the web server, clearly no challenges running it on any of the Linux distributions we were maintaining, and arguably the implementation with the smallest memory footprint given the choices above.

      See more
      JavaScript logo

      JavaScript

      218.2K
      172.6K
      7.8K
      Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions
      218.2K
      172.6K
      + 1
      7.8K
      PROS OF JAVASCRIPT
      • 1.6K
        Can be used on frontend/backend
      • 1.5K
        It's everywhere
      • 1.1K
        Lots of great frameworks
      • 887
        Fast
      • 736
        Light weight
      • 416
        Flexible
      • 383
        You can't get a device today that doesn't run js
      • 284
        Non-blocking i/o
      • 233
        Ubiquitousness
      • 188
        Expressive
      • 51
        Extended functionality to web pages
      • 44
        Relatively easy language
      • 42
        Executed on the client side
      • 26
        Relatively fast to the end user
      • 22
        Pure Javascript
      • 17
        Functional programming
      • 11
        Async
      • 8
        Setup is easy
      • 7
        Because I love functions
      • 7
        JavaScript is the New PHP
      • 7
        Like it or not, JS is part of the web standard
      • 7
        Its everywhere
      • 7
        Full-stack
      • 6
        Expansive community
      • 6
        Future Language of The Web
      • 6
        Can be used in backend, frontend and DB
      • 5
        Evolution of C
      • 5
        Everyone use it
      • 5
        Love-hate relationship
      • 5
        Easy to hire developers
      • 5
        Supports lambdas and closures
      • 5
        Agile, packages simple to use
      • 5
        Popularized Class-Less Architecture & Lambdas
      • 5
        For the good parts
      • 4
        Everywhere
      • 4
        Hard not to use
      • 4
        Promise relationship
      • 4
        Scope manipulation
      • 4
        It's fun
      • 4
        Client processing
      • 4
        Nice
      • 4
        Easy to make something
      • 4
        Can be used on frontend/backend/Mobile/create PRO Ui
      • 4
        Easy
      • 4
        Photoshop has 3 JS runtimes built in
      • 4
        Can be used both as frontend and backend as well
      • 4
        Most Popular Language in the World
      • 4
        It let's me use Babel & Typescript
      • 4
        What to add
      • 4
        Clojurescript
      • 4
        Function expressions are useful for callbacks
      • 4
        No need to use PHP
      • 4
        Its fun and fast
      • 4
        Powerful
      • 4
        Versitile
      • 4
        Client side JS uses the visitors CPU to save Server Res
      • 4
        1.6K Can be used on frontend/backend
      • 4
        Stockholm Syndrome
      • 3
        Because it is so simple and lightweight
      • 3
        Only Programming language on browser
      • 2
        JavaScript j.s
      • 2
        Acoperișul 0757604335
      CONS OF JAVASCRIPT
      • 21
        A constant moving target, too much churn
      • 20
        Horribly inconsistent
      • 14
        Javascript is the New PHP
      • 8
        No ability to monitor memory utilitization
      • 6
        Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
      • 5
        Can be ugly
      • 4
        Thinks strange results are better than errors
      • 2
        No GitHub
      • 1
        Slow

      related JavaScript posts

      Zach Holman

      Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

      But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

      But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

      Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

      See more
      Conor Myhrvold
      Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 39 upvotes · 4.2M views

      How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

      Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

      Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

      https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

      (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

      Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

      See more
      Python logo

      Python

      149.8K
      123.8K
      6.5K
      A clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.
      149.8K
      123.8K
      + 1
      6.5K
      PROS OF PYTHON
      • 1.1K
        Great libraries
      • 933
        Readable code
      • 824
        Beautiful code
      • 771
        Rapid development
      • 674
        Large community
      • 420
        Open source
      • 380
        Elegant
      • 270
        Great community
      • 262
        Object oriented
      • 209
        Dynamic typing
      • 71
        Great standard library
      • 53
        Very fast
      • 50
        Functional programming
      • 37
        Scientific computing
      • 36
        Easy to learn
      • 31
        Great documentation
      • 25
        Matlab alternative
      • 23
        Productivity
      • 23
        Easy to read
      • 20
        Simple is better than complex
      • 18
        It's the way I think
      • 17
        Imperative
      • 15
        Very programmer and non-programmer friendly
      • 15
        Free
      • 14
        Powerfull language
      • 14
        Powerful
      • 13
        Fast and simple
      • 12
        Scripting
      • 11
        Machine learning support
      • 9
        Explicit is better than implicit
      • 8
        Ease of development
      • 8
        Unlimited power
      • 8
        Clear and easy and powerfull
      • 7
        Import antigravity
      • 6
        Print "life is short, use python"
      • 6
        It's lean and fun to code
      • 5
        Fast coding and good for competitions
      • 5
        Flat is better than nested
      • 5
        There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious
      • 5
        Python has great libraries for data processing
      • 5
        High Documented language
      • 5
        I love snakes
      • 5
        Although practicality beats purity
      • 5
        Great for tooling
      • 4
        Readability counts
      • 3
        Plotting
      • 3
        CG industry needs
      • 3
        Beautiful is better than ugly
      • 3
        Complex is better than complicated
      • 3
        Great for analytics
      • 3
        Multiple Inheritence
      • 3
        Now is better than never
      • 3
        Lists, tuples, dictionaries
      • 3
        Rapid Prototyping
      • 3
        Socially engaged community
      • 2
        List comprehensions
      • 2
        Web scraping
      • 2
        Many types of collections
      • 2
        Ys
      • 2
        Easy to setup and run smooth
      • 2
        Generators
      • 2
        Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules
      • 2
        If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad id
      • 2
        If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a g
      • 2
        Simple and easy to learn
      • 2
        Import this
      • 2
        No cruft
      • 2
        Easy to learn and use
      • 1
        Better outcome
      • 1
        It is Very easy , simple and will you be love programmi
      • 1
        Powerful language for AI
      • 1
        Should START with this but not STICK with This
      • 1
        Flexible and easy
      • 1
        Batteries included
      • 1
        Good
      • 1
        A-to-Z
      • 1
        Only one way to do it
      • 1
        Because of Netflix
      • 1
        Pip install everything
      • 0
        Powerful
      • 0
        Pro
      CONS OF PYTHON
      • 51
        Still divided between python 2 and python 3
      • 29
        Performance impact
      • 26
        Poor syntax for anonymous functions
      • 21
        GIL
      • 19
        Package management is a mess
      • 14
        Too imperative-oriented
      • 12
        Dynamic typing
      • 12
        Hard to understand
      • 10
        Very slow
      • 8
        Not everything is expression
      • 7
        Indentations matter a lot
      • 7
        Explicit self parameter in methods
      • 6
        No anonymous functions
      • 6
        Poor DSL capabilities
      • 6
        Incredibly slow
      • 6
        Requires C functions for dynamic modules
      • 5
        The "lisp style" whitespaces
      • 5
        Fake object-oriented programming
      • 5
        Hard to obfuscate
      • 5
        Threading
      • 4
        Circular import
      • 4
        The benevolent-dictator-for-life quit
      • 4
        Official documentation is unclear.
      • 4
        Lack of Syntax Sugar leads to "the pyramid of doom"
      • 4
        Not suitable for autocomplete
      • 2
        Meta classes
      • 1
        Training wheels (forced indentation)

      related Python posts

      Conor Myhrvold
      Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 39 upvotes · 4.2M views

      How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

      Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

      Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

      https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

      (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

      Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

      See more
      Nick Parsons
      Director of Developer Marketing at Stream · | 35 upvotes · 1.4M views

      Winds 2.0 is an open source Podcast/RSS reader developed by Stream with a core goal to enable a wide range of developers to contribute.

      We chose JavaScript because nearly every developer knows or can, at the very least, read JavaScript. With ES6 and Node.js v10.x.x, it’s become a very capable language. Async/Await is powerful and easy to use (Async/Await vs Promises). Babel allows us to experiment with next-generation JavaScript (features that are not in the official JavaScript spec yet). Yarn allows us to consistently install packages quickly (and is filled with tons of new tricks)

      We’re using JavaScript for everything – both front and backend. Most of our team is experienced with Go and Python, so Node was not an obvious choice for this app.

      Sure... there will be haters who refuse to acknowledge that there is anything remotely positive about JavaScript (there are even rants on Hacker News about Node.js); however, without writing completely in JavaScript, we would not have seen the results we did.

      #FrameworksFullStack #Languages

      See more
      PHP logo

      PHP

      111.5K
      56.1K
      4.5K
      A popular general-purpose scripting language that is especially suited to web development
      111.5K
      56.1K
      + 1
      4.5K
      PROS OF PHP
      • 942
        Large community
      • 806
        Open source
      • 759
        Easy deployment
      • 482
        Great frameworks
      • 385
        The best glue on the web
      • 234
        Continual improvements
      • 181
        Good old web
      • 142
        Web foundation
      • 133
        Community packages
      • 124
        Tool support
      • 33
        Used by wordpress
      • 31
        Excellent documentation
      • 26
        Used by Facebook
      • 23
        Because of Symfony
      • 19
        Dynamic Language
      • 15
        Cheap hosting
      • 14
        Awesome Language and easy to implement
      • 14
        Very powerful web language
      • 13
        Fast development
      • 11
        Easy to learn
      • 11
        Composer
      • 10
        Flexibility, syntax, extensibility
      • 10
        Because of Laravel
      • 8
        Easiest deployment
      • 7
        Readable Code
      • 7
        Short development lead times
      • 7
        Worst popularity quality ratio
      • 7
        Fastestest Time to Version 1.0 Deployments
      • 6
        Faster then ever
      • 6
        Fast
      • 6
        Most of the web uses it
      • 5
        Open source and large community
      • 5
        Simple, flexible yet Scalable
      • 4
        Has the best ecommerce(Magento,Prestashop,Opencart,etc)
      • 4
        Large community, easy setup, easy deployment, framework
      • 4
        Open source and great framework
      • 4
        Easy to use and learn
      • 4
        Cheap to own
      • 4
        Easy to learn, a big community, lot of frameworks
      • 4
        Is like one zip of air
      • 4
        I have no choice :(
      • 3
        Great developer experience
      • 2
        Hard not to use
      • 2
        FFI
      • 2
        Interpreted at the run time
      • 2
        Great flexibility. From fast prototyping to large apps
      • 2
        Used by STOMT
      • 2
        Fault tolerance
      • 2
        Safe the planet
      • 2
        Walk away
      CONS OF PHP
      • 20
        So easy to learn, good practices are hard to find
      • 16
        Inconsistent API
      • 8
        Fragmented community
      • 5
        Not secure
      • 2
        No routing system
      • 1
        Hard to debug
      • 1
        Old

      related PHP posts

      Nick Rockwell
      SVP, Engineering at Fastly · | 44 upvotes · 1.7M views

      When I joined NYT there was already broad dissatisfaction with the LAMP (Linux Apache HTTP Server MySQL PHP) Stack and the front end framework, in particular. So, I wasn't passing judgment on it. I mean, LAMP's fine, you can do good work in LAMP. It's a little dated at this point, but it's not ... I didn't want to rip it out for its own sake, but everyone else was like, "We don't like this, it's really inflexible." And I remember from being outside the company when that was called MIT FIVE when it had launched. And been observing it from the outside, and I was like, you guys took so long to do that and you did it so carefully, and yet you're not happy with your decisions. Why is that? That was more the impetus. If we're going to do this again, how are we going to do it in a way that we're gonna get a better result?

      So we're moving quickly away from LAMP, I would say. So, right now, the new front end is React based and using Apollo. And we've been in a long, protracted, gradual rollout of the core experiences.

      React is now talking to GraphQL as a primary API. There's a Node.js back end, to the front end, which is mainly for server-side rendering, as well.

      Behind there, the main repository for the GraphQL server is a big table repository, that we call Bodega because it's a convenience store. And that reads off of a Kafka pipeline.

      See more
      Simon Reymann
      Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 25 upvotes · 2.1M views

      Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

      • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
      • npm as package manager
      • NestJS as Node.js framework
      • TypeScript as programming language
      • ExpressJS as web server
      • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
      • Postman as a tool for API development
      • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
      • JSON Web Token for access token management

      The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

      • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
      • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
      • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
      • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
      See more
      HTML5 logo

      HTML5

      98.8K
      79.2K
      2.2K
      5th major revision of the core language of the World Wide Web
      98.8K
      79.2K
      + 1
      2.2K
      PROS OF HTML5
      • 444
        New doctype
      • 388
        Local storage
      • 334
        Canvas
      • 285
        Semantic header and footer
      • 238
        Video element
      • 120
        Geolocation
      • 105
        Form autofocus
      • 98
        Email inputs
      • 84
        Editable content
      • 79
        Application caches
      • 9
        Cleaner Code
      • 9
        Easy to use
      • 4
        Easy
      • 4
        Semantical
      • 3
        Websockets
      • 3
        Better
      • 3
        Audio element
      • 3
        Modern
      • 2
        Content focused
      • 2
        Compatible
      • 2
        Portability
      • 2
        Semantic Header and Footer, Geolocation, New Doctype
      CONS OF HTML5
        Be the first to leave a con

        related HTML5 posts

        Jonathan Pugh
        Software Engineer / Project Manager / Technical Architect · | 25 upvotes · 1.6M views

        I needed to choose a full stack of tools for cross platform mobile application design & development. After much research and trying different tools, these are what I came up with that work for me today:

        For the client coding I chose Framework7 because of its performance, easy learning curve, and very well designed, beautiful UI widgets. I think it's perfect for solo development or small teams. I didn't like React Native. It felt heavy to me and rigid. Framework7 allows the use of #CSS3, which I think is the best technology to come out of the #WWW movement. No other tech has been able to allow designers and developers to develop such flexible, high performance, customisable user interface elements that are highly responsive and hardware accelerated before. Now #CSS3 includes variables and flexboxes it is truly a powerful language and there is no longer a need for preprocessors such as #SCSS / #Sass / #less. React Native contains a very limited interpretation of #CSS3 which I found very frustrating after using #CSS3 for some years already and knowing its powerful features. The other very nice feature of Framework7 is that you can even build for the browser if you want your app to be available for desktop web browsers. The latest release also includes the ability to build for #Electron so you can have MacOS, Windows and Linux desktop apps. This is not possible with React Native yet.

        Framework7 runs on top of Apache Cordova. Cordova and webviews have been slated as being slow in the past. Having a game developer background I found the tweeks to make it run as smooth as silk. One of those tweeks is to use WKWebView. Another important one was using srcset on images.

        I use #Template7 for the for the templating system which is a no-nonsense mobile-centric #HandleBars style extensible templating system. It's easy to write custom helpers for, is fast and has a small footprint. I'm not forced into a new paradigm or learning some new syntax. It operates with standard JavaScript, HTML5 and CSS 3. It's written by the developer of Framework7 and so dovetails with it as expected.

        I configured TypeScript to work with the latest version of Framework7. I consider TypeScript to be one of the best creations to come out of Microsoft in some time. They must have an amazing team working on it. It's very powerful and flexible. It helps you catch a lot of bugs and also provides code completion in supporting IDEs. So for my IDE I use Visual Studio Code which is a blazingly fast and silky smooth editor that integrates seamlessly with TypeScript for the ultimate type checking setup (both products are produced by Microsoft).

        I use Webpack and Babel to compile the JavaScript. TypeScript can compile to JavaScript directly but Babel offers a few more options and polyfills so you can use the latest (and even prerelease) JavaScript features today and compile to be backwards compatible with virtually any browser. My favorite recent addition is "optional chaining" which greatly simplifies and increases readability of a number of sections of my code dealing with getting and setting data in nested objects.

        I use some Ruby scripts to process images with ImageMagick and pngquant to optimise for size and even auto insert responsive image code into the HTML5. Ruby is the ultimate cross platform scripting language. Even as your scripts become large, Ruby allows you to refactor your code easily and make it Object Oriented if necessary. I find it the quickest and easiest way to maintain certain aspects of my build process.

        For the user interface design and prototyping I use Figma. Figma has an almost identical user interface to #Sketch but has the added advantage of being cross platform (MacOS and Windows). Its real-time collaboration features are outstanding and I use them a often as I work mostly on remote projects. Clients can collaborate in real-time and see changes I make as I make them. The clickable prototyping features in Figma are also very well designed and mean I can send clickable prototypes to clients to try user interface updates as they are made and get immediate feedback. I'm currently also evaluating the latest version of #AdobeXD as an alternative to Figma as it has the very cool auto-animate feature. It doesn't have real-time collaboration yet, but I heard it is proposed for 2019.

        For the UI icons I use Font Awesome Pro. They have the largest selection and best looking icons you can find on the internet with several variations in styles so you can find most of the icons you want for standard projects.

        For the backend I was using the #GraphCool Framework. As I later found out, #GraphQL still has some way to go in order to provide the full power of a mature graph query language so later in my project I ripped out #GraphCool and replaced it with CouchDB and Pouchdb. Primarily so I could provide good offline app support. CouchDB with Pouchdb is very flexible and efficient combination and overcomes some of the restrictions I found in #GraphQL and hence #GraphCool also. The most impressive and important feature of CouchDB is its replication. You can configure it in various ways for backups, fault tolerance, caching or conditional merging of databases. CouchDB and Pouchdb even supports storing, retrieving and serving binary or image data or other mime types. This removes a level of complexity usually present in database implementations where binary or image data is usually referenced through an #HTML5 link. With CouchDB and Pouchdb apps can operate offline and sync later, very efficiently, when the network connection is good.

        I use PhoneGap when testing the app. It auto-reloads your app when its code is changed and you can also install it on Android phones to preview your app instantly. iOS is a bit more tricky cause of Apple's policies so it's not available on the App Store, but you can build it and install it yourself to your device.

        So that's my latest mobile stack. What tools do you use? Have you tried these ones?

        See more
        Jeyabalaji Subramanian

        At FundsCorner, when we set out to pick up the front-end tech stack (around Dec 2017), we drove our decision based on the following considerations:

        (1) We were clear that we will NOT have a hybrid app. We will start with Responsive Web & once there is traction, we will rollout our Android App. However, we wanted to ensure that the users have a consistent experience on both the Web & the App. So, the front-end framework must also have a material design component library which we can choose from.

        (2) Before joining FundsCorner as a CTO, I had already worked with Angular. I enjoyed working with Angular, but I felt that I must choose something that will provide us with the fastest time from Concept to Reality.

        (3) I am strong proponent of segregating HTML & JavaScript. I.e. I was not for writing or generating HTML through JavaScript. Because, this will mean that the Front-end developers I have to hire will always be very strong on JavaScript alongside HTML5 & CSS. I was looking for a Framework that was on JavaScript but not HEAVY on JavaScript.

        (3) The first iteration of the web app was to be done by myself. But I was clear that when someone takes up the mantle, they will be able to come up the curve fast.

        In the end, Vue.js and Vuetify satisfied all the above criteria with aplomb! When I did our first POC on Vue.js I could not believe that front-end development could be this fast. The documentation was par excellence and all the required essentials that come along with the Framework (viz. Routing, Store, Validations) etc. were available from the same community! It was also a breeze to integrate with other JavaScript libraries (such as Amazon Cognito).

        By picking Vuetify, we were able to provide a consistent UI experience between our Web App and Native App, besides making the UI development ultra blazing fast!

        In the end, we were able to rollout our Web App in record 6 weeks (that included the end to end Loan Origination flow, Loans management system & Customer engagement module). www.jeyabalaji.com

        See more
        Java logo

        Java

        90.1K
        67.9K
        3.6K
        A concurrent, class-based, object-oriented, language specifically designed to have as few implementation dependencies as possible
        90.1K
        67.9K
        + 1
        3.6K
        PROS OF JAVA
        • 582
          Great libraries
        • 438
          Widely used
        • 397
          Excellent tooling
        • 384
          Huge amount of documentation available
        • 330
          Large pool of developers available
        • 202
          Open source
        • 197
          Excellent performance
        • 153
          Great development
        • 147
          Vast array of 3rd party libraries
        • 146
          Used for android
        • 58
          Compiled Language
        • 48
          Used for Web
        • 45
          Managed memory
        • 43
          Native threads
        • 43
          High Performance
        • 40
          Statically typed
        • 34
          Easy to read
        • 32
          Great Community
        • 28
          Reliable platform
        • 23
          JVM compatibility
        • 23
          Sturdy garbage collection
        • 20
          Cross Platform Enterprise Integration
        • 19
          Universal platform
        • 19
          Good amount of APIs
        • 17
          Great Support
        • 12
          Great ecosystem
        • 11
          Lots of boilerplate
        • 10
          Backward compatible
        • 10
          Everywhere
        • 8
          Excellent SDK - JDK
        • 6
          It's Java
        • 6
          Mature language thus stable systems
        • 6
          Static typing
        • 5
          Portability
        • 5
          Clojure
        • 5
          Vast Collections Library
        • 5
          Better than Ruby
        • 5
          Long term language
        • 5
          Cross-platform
        • 4
          Old tech
        • 4
          Most developers favorite
        • 4
          Used for Android development
        • 3
          Testable
        • 3
          Javadoc
        • 3
          Best martial for design
        • 3
          Great Structure
        • 3
          Stable platform, which many new languages depend on
        • 2
          History
        CONS OF JAVA
        • 30
          Verbosity
        • 25
          NullpointerException
        • 16
          Overcomplexity is praised in community culture
        • 14
          Nightmare to Write
        • 11
          Boiler plate code
        • 8
          Classpath hell prior to Java 9
        • 6
          No REPL
        • 4
          No property
        • 2
          Floating-point errors
        • 2
          There is not optional parameter
        • 2
          Code are too long
        • 2
          Non-intuitive generic implementation
        • 1
          Returning Wildcard Types
        • 1
          Java's too statically, stronglly, and strictly typed
        • 1
          Terrbible compared to Python/Batch Perormence

        related Java posts

        Conor Myhrvold
        Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 39 upvotes · 4.2M views

        How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

        Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

        Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

        https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

        (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

        Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

        See more
        Kamil Kowalski
        Lead Architect at Fresha · | 27 upvotes · 1.2M views

        When you think about test automation, it’s crucial to make it everyone’s responsibility (not just QA Engineers'). We started with Selenium and Java, but with our platform revolving around Ruby, Elixir and JavaScript, QA Engineers were left alone to automate tests. Cypress was the answer, as we could switch to JS and simply involve more people from day one. There's a downside too, as it meant testing on Chrome only, but that was "good enough" for us + if really needed we can always cover some specific cases in a different way.

        See more