StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Devise vs JSON Web Token

Devise vs JSON Web Token

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Devise
Devise
Stacks535
Followers232
Votes56
JSON Web Token
JSON Web Token
Stacks1.8K
Followers367
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.7K
Forks374

Devise vs JSON Web Token: What are the differences?

Introduction: Devise and JSON Web Token are two different authentication mechanisms used in web development. While Devise is a Ruby gem that provides a full-featured authentication system, JSON Web Token (JWT) is an open standard for securely transmitting information between parties as a JSON object.

  1. Installation and Setup: Devise requires installation and configuration in the Ruby on Rails application. It generates different views, controllers, and models for authentication, which can be customized as per the requirements. On the other hand, to use JWT, developers need to manually implement the token generation, verification, and storage logic. There is no standard package or library like Devise to handle the setup, making it more flexible but requiring more manual effort.

  2. Session Management: Devise uses session-based authentication, where session cookies are stored on the server-side to maintain the user's session. It allows for easy tracking of logged-in users, session expiration, and handling of logout actions. In contrast, JWT is stateless and does not rely on session cookies. It communicates with the client using a digitally signed token, which is sent with each HTTP request and contains user information. Server-side session management is not required, making JWT more suitable for stateless APIs.

  3. Scalability and Performance: Since Devise relies on server-side session management and database queries to authenticate and authorize users, it might impact scalability and performance for large-scale applications with high traffic. JWT, being stateless and containing all necessary information within the token, reduces the burden on the server and allows for better scalability and performance. It eliminates the need for database queries during each authentication request.

  4. Token Expiration and Revocation: Devise provides easy ways to manage session expiration, allowing developers to define session timeout periods and handle automatic logout after inactivity. Devise also supports manual revocation of sessions. JWT includes an expiration time (exp) field within the token itself, eliminating the need for server sessions. Once the token expires, the user needs to reauthenticate to obtain a new token. Immediate revocation of a JWT can be challenging since it requires storing and managing a list of revoked tokens.

  5. Flexibility and Integration: Devise provides a variety of authentication strategies such as database authenticatable, omniauthable, token authenticatable, etc. It also integrates well with other Ruby gems and libraries. JWT offers flexibility as it can be used across different languages and platforms, not just limited to Ruby or Rails. It can be easily integrated with existing authentication systems or used standalone for API authentication.

  6. Security: Devise follows best practices for authentication, including password encryption, secure session management, and protection against common attacks. However, specific security vulnerabilities may arise from misconfigurations or improper use. JWT provides security through the use of digital signatures or encryption algorithms. It ensures the integrity and authenticity of the token, preventing tampering and unauthorized access. However, storing sensitive or private information within a token can be a potential security risk if not handled properly.

In summary, Devise is a feature-rich authentication gem that simplifies authentication implementation in Ruby on Rails applications, while JWT is a flexible and stateless authentication mechanism that can be used across different platforms and is suitable for stateless APIs, with the trade-off of manual setup and potential security risks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Devise
Devise
JSON Web Token
JSON Web Token

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

JSON Web Token is an open standard that defines a compact and self-contained way for securely transmitting information between parties as a JSON object. This information can be verified and trusted because it is digitally signed.

Is Rack based;Is a complete MVC solution based on Rails engines;Allows you to have multiple models signed in at the same time;Is based on a modularity concept: use just what you really need.
compact;self-contained
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
3.7K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
374
Stacks
535
Stacks
1.8K
Followers
232
Followers
367
Votes
56
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 33
    Reliable
  • 17
    Open Source
  • 4
    Support for neo4j database
  • 2
    Secure
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Rails
Rails
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Devise, JSON Web Token?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope