StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Devise vs OAuth2

Devise vs OAuth2

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Devise
Devise
Stacks535
Followers232
Votes56
OAuth2
OAuth2
Stacks683
Followers650
Votes0

Devise vs OAuth2: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Devise and OAuth2, two commonly used authentication mechanisms for websites.

  1. Storage and Management: Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails applications that focuses on providing a complete authentication system with user registration, authentication, and password reset. It stores user credentials and handles user management tasks within the application's database. On the other hand, OAuth2 is an authorization framework that separates the authentication process from the application and delegates it to an external provider, such as Google or Facebook. It does not store user credentials and relies on tokens for authentication.

  2. User Experience: Devise allows users to create and manage accounts within the application itself, providing a seamless user experience. Users can easily sign up, log in, and manage their profile information directly on the application. In contrast, OAuth2 offers a more streamlined user experience by allowing users to authenticate using their existing accounts with external providers. This eliminates the need for users to create new accounts and remember additional login credentials.

  3. Security: Devise provides various mechanisms to secure user accounts, including password encryption, lockable accounts, and password complexity validations. Since user credentials are stored within the application's database, the application has full control over the security measures implemented. OAuth2, on the other hand, relies on the security measures provided by the external providers. The responsibility of securing user accounts lies with the provider, reducing the security burden on the application.

  4. Integration and Ecosystem: Devise is tightly integrated with Ruby on Rails and provides a set of built-in views and controllers for authentication-related tasks. It has a large ecosystem of plugins and extensions, allowing developers to customize the authentication system according to their needs. OAuth2, being an external provider-based authentication mechanism, requires integration with the chosen provider's APIs. It may require additional configuration and implementation, depending on the provider's requirements.

  5. Scalability and Maintenance: Devise is well-suited for applications that require complete control over user authentication and management. It provides a robust and flexible architecture that can handle a large number of users efficiently. Since it is self-contained within the application, it simplifies maintenance and upgrades. On the other hand, OAuth2 reduces the burden of user authentication and management on the application. It leverages the infrastructure and resources provided by external providers, making it suitable for applications that prioritize scalability and offloading authentication responsibilities.

  6. Support and Community: Devise has a strong community of developers actively maintaining and supporting the gem. It has extensive documentation, tutorials, and community-driven resources available to assist developers in implementing and customizing authentication. OAuth2, being a standardized protocol, also has good community support and extensive documentation available. However, the level of support may vary depending on the chosen provider and their individual documentation and resources.

In summary, Devise is an authentication solution that focuses on providing a complete and customizable authentication system within the application, offering control over user management and security. On the other hand, OAuth2 delegates authentication to external providers, streamlining the user experience and offloading security and management responsibilities to the providers. The choice between Devise and OAuth2 depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the application.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Devise
Devise
OAuth2
OAuth2

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

It is an authorization framework that enables a third-party application to obtain limited access to an HTTP service, either on behalf of a resource owner by orchestrating an approval interaction between the resource owner and the HTTP service, or by allowing the third-party application to obtain access on its own behalf.

Is Rack based;Is a complete MVC solution based on Rails engines;Allows you to have multiple models signed in at the same time;Is based on a modularity concept: use just what you really need.
-
Statistics
Stacks
535
Stacks
683
Followers
232
Followers
650
Votes
56
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 33
    Reliable
  • 17
    Open Source
  • 4
    Support for neo4j database
  • 2
    Secure
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Rails
Rails
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Devise, OAuth2?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope