Overview

Passport

Stacks471

Followers368

Votes0

GitHub Stars23.5K

Forks1.2K

Django REST framework JWT

Stacks59

Followers151

Votes2

GitHub Stars3.2K

Forks653

Django REST framework JWT vs Passport: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, I will be providing the key differences between Django REST framework JWT and Passport. These two authentication libraries are used for different frameworks, Django REST framework for Django and Passport for Node.js. The key differences between these two libraries can be summarized as follows:

Token Management: When it comes to token management, Django REST framework JWT uses JSON Web Tokens (JWT) to handle authentication. The tokens generated by this library are self-contained, containing user information and expiration time. On the other hand, Passport uses session-based authentication, where session IDs are stored in cookies and verified on subsequent requests. This difference in token management affects the way authentication is handled in both libraries.
Integration Requirements: Django REST framework JWT is specifically designed for Django, which means it seamlessly integrates with Django's authentication system. This makes it easier to implement JWT authentication in Django web applications. On the other hand, Passport is a flexible authentication library for Node.js, allowing integration with various frameworks and libraries like Express, Koa, and Sails. The integration requirements for these two libraries differ based on the platform they are used on.
Scalability: When it comes to scalability, Django REST framework JWT can handle large-scale web applications efficiently. This library has built-in support for scalability features like token refresh and blacklisting, which allows it to handle a high number of requests smoothly. In comparison, Passport offers flexibility but might not have the same scalability features as Django REST framework JWT out of the box. However, Passport can be extended and customized to meet specific scalability requirements.
Community Support: Django REST framework JWT has a large and active community backing it, with a wide range of resources available for support and troubleshooting. This community support makes it easier for developers to find solutions to common issues and stay updated with the latest enhancements. On the other hand, Passport also has a significant community supporting it, but it might not have the same extensive resources available as Django REST framework JWT. Developers using Passport might need to rely more on their own research and experimentation.
Ease of Setup: When it comes to ease of setup, Django REST framework JWT provides a straightforward setup process within a Django application. It seamlessly integrates with the existing Django authentication system and can be quickly implemented with minimal configuration. In comparison, Passport requires a bit more setup and configuration, especially when used with different frameworks and libraries. Developers using Passport might need to spend more time setting up the necessary dependencies and configuring the authentication process.
Third-Party Integration: Django REST framework JWT offers easy integration with third-party libraries like Django OAuth Toolkit and Django Allauth, making it convenient to incorporate additional authentication options into a Django application. On the other hand, Passport has its own ecosystem of third-party strategies and plugins, allowing developers to integrate with various authentication providers like Facebook, Twitter, and Google. The availability and ease of integration with third-party libraries differ between Django REST framework JWT and Passport.

In summary, the key differences between Django REST framework JWT and Passport lie in their token management approach, integration requirements, scalability features, community support, ease of setup, and options for third-party integration. These differences should be considered based on the specific requirements and platform when choosing between the two libraries.

🔥 Trending in Authentication on StackShare

OAuth2 Authentication

An open standard for access delegation

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

4

650

Advice on Passport, Django REST framework JWT

Vaibhav

Jul 17, 2020

Needs advice

Currently, Passport.js repo has 324 open issues, and Jared (the original author) seems to be the one doing most of the work. Also, given that the documentation is not proper. Is it worth using Passport.js?

As of now, StackShare shows it has 29 companies using it. How do you implement auth in your project or your company? Are there any good alternatives to Passport.js? Should I implement auth from scratch?

220k views220k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Passport	Django REST framework JWT
It is authentication middleware for Node.js. Extremely flexible and modular, It can be unobtrusively dropped in to any Express-based web application. A comprehensive set of strategies support authentication using a username and password, Facebook, Twitter, and more.	This package provides JSON Web Token Authentication support for Django REST framework. Unlike some more typical uses of JWTs, this module only generates authentication tokens that will verify the user who is requesting one of your DRF protected API resources.
Single sign-on with OpenID and OAuth; Easily handle success and failure	JSON Web Token Authentication ; Django REST framework; Generates authentication tokens
Statistics
GitHub Stars 23.5K	GitHub Stars 3.2K
GitHub Forks 1.2K	GitHub Forks 653
Stacks 471	Stacks 59
Followers 368	Followers 151
Votes 0	Votes 2
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 2 Stateless
Integrations
ExpressJS Vue.js JSON Web Token	Django REST framework Python JSON Web Token Django

What are some alternatives to Passport, Django REST framework JWT?

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.