StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Moby vs dockersh

Moby vs dockersh

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

dockersh
dockersh
Stacks7
Followers15
Votes4
GitHub Stars1.3K
Forks79
Moby
Moby
Stacks38
Followers57
Votes0
GitHub Stars71.0K
Forks18.8K

Moby vs dockersh: What are the differences?

Introduction

Moby and dockersh are both containerization tools used in the world of software development and deployment. However, there are key differences between these two tools that set them apart. In this article, we will explore the top 6 differences between Moby and dockersh.

  1. Definition and Scope: Moby is an open-source project that provides a framework for assembling container-based systems, while dockersh is a tool that acts as a dynamic Docker-based shell. Moby focuses on providing a customizable and extensible platform for building container systems, while dockersh provides a more specific solution for managing Docker containers within a shell environment.

  2. Architecture: Moby follows a modular architecture, where different components can be selected and combined together to create a custom container system. On the other hand, dockersh is designed as a shell script that interacts with the Docker API and provides a convenient way to manage and switch between Docker containers within a shell environment.

  3. Functionality: Moby primarily focuses on providing a building block for creating container systems and does not provide high-level abstractions or user interfaces for managing containers. On the other hand, dockersh focuses on providing shell-based tools and commands for managing Docker containers, making it easier to work with containers directly within a shell environment.

  4. Customizability: Moby is highly customizable and allows users to select and integrate different components based on their specific requirements. It provides a flexible platform for building custom container systems. On the other hand, dockersh is more focused on providing a specific set of functionality for managing Docker containers within a shell environment, and it may not have the same level of customizability as Moby.

  5. Community and Support: Moby has a larger and more active community compared to dockersh. This makes it easier to find support, documentation, and community-driven extensions or plugins for Moby. Dockersh, being a more specific tool, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available for support and extension.

  6. Target Audience: Moby is targeted towards developers, system architects, and advanced users who want to build custom container systems or leverage its modular architecture. Dockersh, on the other hand, is targeted towards users who primarily work with Docker containers within a shell environment and require a convenient way to manage and interact with containers from the command line.

In summary, Moby is a customizable containerization framework that provides building blocks for creating container systems, while dockersh is a tool focused on managing Docker containers within a shell environment. Moby offers customizability, modular architecture, and a larger community, while dockersh specializes in shell-based management of Docker containers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

dockersh
dockersh
Moby
Moby

dockersh is designed to be used as a login shell on machines with multiple interactive users. When a user invokes dockersh, it will bring up a Docker container (if not already running), and then spawn a new interactive shell in the container's namespace.

Moby is a project which provides a “Lego set” of dozens of components, the framework for assembling them into custom container-based systems, and a place for all container enthusiasts to experiment and exchange ideas. Docker the product will be assembled from components that are packaged by the Moby project.

-
Orchestration; Image Management; Secret Management; Configuration Management; Networking; Provisioning
Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.3K
GitHub Stars
71.0K
GitHub Forks
79
GitHub Forks
18.8K
Stacks
7
Stacks
38
Followers
15
Followers
57
Votes
4
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Multiple users to ssh onto a single box
  • 1
    Isolation
  • 1
    Privacy
  • 1
    Secure
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to dockersh, Moby?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana