Overview

Liquid

Stacks261

Followers126

Votes0

GitHub Stars11.5K

Forks1.5K

EJS

Stacks522

Followers359

Votes18

GitHub Stars8.0K

Forks859

EJS vs Liquid: What are the differences?

## Key Differences: EJS vs. Liquid

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Syntax**: EJS uses JavaScript syntax for templating, allowing developers familiar with JavaScript to easily work with it. On the other hand, Liquid has a simpler and more human-readable syntax, making it easier for non-programmers to understand and use.
2. **Variables**: EJS allows for direct JavaScript code execution within the templates, giving more flexibility in manipulating data. Liquid, however, restricts the use of complex logic and operations in its templates, making it safer but less powerful in terms of data manipulation.
3. **Filters**: Liquid provides a rich set of filters that can be applied to variables for formatting and manipulation, while EJS lacks built-in filter capabilities, requiring developers to write custom functions for similar tasks.
4. **Inheritance and Layouts**: EJS supports complex layouts and inheritance structures, making it suitable for projects with multiple views and shared components. Liquid, on the other hand, has limited support for layout inheritance, which can make managing large projects more challenging.
5. **Extensibility**: EJS offers a range of plugins and extensions that can be used to enhance its functionality, while Liquid has a more limited ecosystem for extending its core features.
6. **Performance**: EJS is generally faster in rendering templates compared to Liquid, making it more suitable for applications where speed is a priority.

In Summary, EJS and Liquid differ in syntax, variable handling, filters, inheritance, extensibility, and performance.

🔥 Trending in Templating Languages & Extensions on StackShare

Sass Templating Languages Extensions

Syntactically Awesome Style Sheets

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

88

32.2k

Advice on Liquid, EJS

Asad

Software Engineer at Lisec Automation

Jun 15, 2020

Needs adviceon

.NET

Handlebars.js

@All: I am searching for the best template engine for .NET. I started looking into several template engines, including the Dotliquid, Handlebars.js, Scriban, and Razorlight. I found handlebar a bit difficult to use when using the loops and condition because you need to register for helper first. DotLiquid and Scriban were easy to use and in Razorlight I did not find the example for loops.

Can you please suggest which template engine is best suited for the use of conditional/list and looping and why? Or if anybody could provide me a resource or link where I can compare which is best?

Thanks In Advance

240k views240k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Liquid	EJS
It is an open-source template language written in Ruby. It is the backbone of Shopify themes and is used to load dynamic content on storefronts. It is safe, customer facing template language for flexible web apps.	It is a simple templating language that lets you generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. No religiousness about how to organize things. No reinvention of iteration and control-flow. It's just plain JavaScript.
Render templates directly from the database;Smarty (PHP) style template engines;Template engine which does HTML just as well as emails;Allow your users to edit the appearance of your application but don't want them to run insecure code on your server	Template caching and partials;Intelligent error handling with line numbers
Statistics
GitHub Stars 11.5K	GitHub Stars 8.0K
GitHub Forks 1.5K	GitHub Forks 859
Stacks 261	Stacks 522
Followers 126	Followers 359
Votes 0	Votes 18
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 6 For a beginner it's just plain javascript code 6 It'a easy to understand the concept behind it 3 Quick for templating UI project 3 You almost know how to use it from start
Integrations
VTEX Zendesk Voog Drip Ruby Jekyll Fedora Locomotive CMS	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Liquid, EJS?

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Mustache

Mustache is a logic-less template syntax. It can be used for HTML, config files, source code - anything. It works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a hash or object. We call it "logic-less" because there are no if statements, else clauses, or for loops. Instead there are only tags. Some tags are replaced with a value, some nothing, and others a series of values.

Slim Lang

Slim is a template language whose goal is to reduce the view syntax to the essential parts without becoming cryptic. It started as an exercise to see how much could be removed from a standard html template (<, >, closing tags, etc...). As more people took an interest in Slim, the functionality grew and so did the flexibility of the syntax.

RactiveJS

Ractive was originally created at theguardian.com to produce news applications. Ractive takes your Mustache templates and transforms them into a lightweight representation of the DOM – then when your data changes, it intelligently updates the real DOM.

Jinja

It is a full featured template engine for Python. It has full unicode support, an optional integrated sandboxed execution environment, widely used and BSD licensed.

Twig

It is a modern template engine for PHP. It is flexible, fast, and secure. Its syntax originates from Jinja and Django templates.

Nunjucks

Rich Powerful language with block inheritance, autoescaping, macros, asynchronous control, and more. Heavily inspired by jinja2. It supports all modern browsers.

Hogan.js

Hogan.js is a 3.4k JS templating engine developed at Twitter. Use it as a part of your asset packager to compile templates ahead of time or include it in your browser to handle dynamic templates.